Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00107653

Latino Study - A Study of PEGASYS (Peginterferon Alfa-2a (40KD)) and COPEGUS (Ribavirin) in Treatment-Naive Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C-Genotype 1.

This single arm study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of PEGASYS (180 micrograms sc weekly) plus ribavirin (1000-1200mg po daily) in treatment-naive Latino patients versus non-Latino Caucasian patients with chronic hepatitis C- genotype 1. The anticipated time on study treatment is 3-12 months and the target sample size is 500+ patients.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

Ponce, Puerto Rico

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • adult patients 18-65 years of age
  • chronic hepatitis C , genotype 1
  • serologic evidence of CHC infection by an antibody test
  • chronic liver disease, consistent with CHC infection on a liver biopsy obtained within the past 18 months
  • compensated liver disease
  • use of 2 forms of contraception during the study in both men and women

Exclusion criteria

  • previous interferon or ribavirin therapy
  • systemic antiviral therapy less than 24 weeks before first dose of study drug or expected need for this treatment any time during the study
  • medical condition associated with chronic liver disease (eg, hemochromatosis, autoimmune hepatitis, alcoholic liver disease, toxin exposure)
  • decompensated liver disease
  • women who are pregnant or breastfeeding

Treatment and study plan

Ribavirin

Drug

1000-1200mg po daily for 48 weeks

Peginterferon alfa-2a

Drug

180 micrograms sc/week for 48 weeks

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virologic Response at Week 72

    Time frame: At Week 72

    Sustained Virologic Response (SVR) is defined as percentage of participants with an undetectable hepatitis C virus-RNA (HCV-RNA) measurement (<28 International Unit (IU)/millilitre (mL)) assessed 24 weeks post-treatment (week 72) which was assessed by Roche High Pure System/COBAS TaqMan HCV Test.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Achieving Virologic Response

    Time frame: At Weeks 4, 12, 24, 48, 60, and 72

    Percentage of participants achieving a virologic response defined as an undetectable HCV-RNA measurement (HCV-RNA <28 IU/mL by Roche High Pure System/COBAS TaqMan HCV Test)

  2. Percentage of Participants With Early Virologic Response at Week 4

    Time frame: At Week 4

    Percentage of participants with an early virologic response defined as an HCVRNA >=1 log10 drop from baseline or undetectable HCV-RNA measurement at Week 4 (lower limit of detection 28 IU/mL).

  3. Percentage of Participants With Early Virologic Response at Week 12

    Time frame: At Week 12

    Percentage of participants with an early virologic response defined as an HCV-RNA >=2 log10 drop from baseline or undetectable HCV-RNA measurement at Week 12 (lower limit of detection 28 IU/mL).

  4. Change From Baseline in HCV-RNA Log10 Titers Over the Period Of Time

    Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) to Weeks 4, 12, 24, 48, 60 and 72

    The table below shows HCV-RNA log10 titers change from baseline values by study week and by study group. Analysis was performed for participants with a baseline and at least 1 post-baseline HCV-RNA assessment. HCV-RNA quantitation was performed using Roche High Pure System/COBAS® TaqMan® HCV Monitor Test. HCV-RNA measurement lower limit of detection was 28 IU/mL.

  5. Percentage of Participants With Biochemical Response

    Time frame: At Weeks 4, 12, 24, 48, 60 and 72

    Biochemical response was defined as normal serum alanine transaminase (ALT) measurement. For ALT measurement the normal range is 5-37 IU/L.

  6. Percentage of Participants With ISHAK Histological Activity Index Response

    Time frame: At Week 72

    ISHAK Histological Activity Index (HAI) activity response is defined as a decrease from baseline of at least 2 points (≥2 points drop from baseline) in the ISHAK modified HAI (necroinflammatory) score at week 72. ISHAK modified HAI activity (necroinflammatory) score is a total score of periportal ± bridging (P/B) necrosis + confluent necrosis + focal necrosis + portal inflammation (maximum score for each participant = 18). Where P/B necrosis grading as 0 = absent; 1 = mild; 2 = mild/moderate; 3 = moderate; 4 = severe; Confluent necrosis grading as 0 = absent; 1 = focal; 2 = zone 3 some areas; 3 = zone 3 most areas; 4 = zone 3 occasional portal; 5 = zone 3 multiple; 6 = panacinar necrosis and Focal necrosis grading as 0: absent; 1: < = 1 focus; 2: 2 to 4 foci; 3: 5 to 10 foci; 4: > 10 foci; Portal Inflammation grading: 0 = none; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = moderate/marked; 4 = marked/all portal.

  7. Mean Change From Baseline in ISHAK HAI Activity (Necroinflammatory) at Week 72

    Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) to Week 72

    ISHAK modified HAI activity (necroinflammatory) score is a total score of P/B necrosis + confluent necrosis + focal necrosis + portal inflammation (maximum score for each Participant = 18). Where P/B necrosis grading as 0 = absent; 1 = mild; 2 = mild/moderate; 3 = moderate; 4 = severe; Confluent necrosis as 0 = absent; 1 = focal; 2 = zone 3 some areas; 3 = zone 3 most areas; 4 = zone 3 occasional portal; 5= zone 3 multiple; 6= panacinar necrosis and Focal necrosis as 0: absent; 1: <= 1 focus; 2: 2 to 4 foci; 3: 5 to 10 foci; 4: > 10 foci; Portal Inflammation: 0 = none; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = moderate/marked; 4 = marked/all portal. The difference between study groups in change from baseline in ISHAK modified HAI activity score at week 72 was tested using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with ethnicity and baseline ISHAK HAI score as the fixed effects.

  8. Mean Change From Baseline in Fibrosis Score Based on ISHAK at Week 72

    Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) to Week 72

    ISHAK Histological Activity Index (HAI) activity response is defined as a decrease from baseline of at least 2 points (≥2 points drop from baseline) score at week 72. Baseline prognostic factors in the original model include ethnicity, sex, age, baseline ALT quotient, baseline HCV-RNA level, and ISHAK fibrosis and activity scores at baseline. ISHAK modified HAI fibrosis scale by fibrosis grading category as F0= no fibrosis; F1= some portal areas; F2= most portal areas; F3= bridging fibrosis; F4= bridging and portal to central; F5 = marked bridging; F6 = Cirrhosis; where '0' being the best and '6' being the worst. Decrease in score from baseline indicates improvement. The difference between study groups in change from baseline in ISHAK modified HAI activity score at week 72 was analysed.

  9. Percentage of Participants With Improved, Stable and Worsened ISHAK Fibrosis Score

    Time frame: At Week 72

    Overall ISHAK Fibrosis Score is defined as Improved: >= 1 category decrease in fibrosis scale; Stable: no change in fibrosis scale; Worsened: >1 category increase in fibrosis scale.

  10. Mean Change From Baseline in Activity and Fibrosis Scores Based on METAVIR Activity at Week 72

    Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) to Week 72

    METAVIR activity scores are categorised as histological activity (A) 0 = none; A1 = mild; A2 = moderate; A3 = severe where '0' being 'No activity' and '3' being 'the sever activity'. Changes in liver inflammation defined as Improved: Participants whose METAVIR activity score at up to Month-72 decreases by 1 or more units compared to baseline; stable: Participants whose METAVIR activity score at up to Month-72 is the same as the baseline score; worsened: Participants whose METAVIR activity score at up to Month-72 increases by 1 or more units compared to baseline. METAVIR fibrosis scores are categorised as fibrosis (F) 0 = no fibrosis; F1 = without septa; F 2 = with septa; F3 = many septa; F4 = cirrhosis where; '0' being the best and '4' being the worst. Decrease in score from baseline indicates improvement. The difference between study groups in change from baseline in activity and fibrosis scores based on METAVIR at week 72 was analysed.

  11. Percentage of Participants With Improved, Stable, and Worsened METAVIR Activity Score

    Time frame: At Week 72

    METAVIR activity scale included activity defines as, Improved: >= 1 category decrease in activity score; stable: no change in activity score; worsened: > = 1 category increase in activity score.

  12. Percentage of Participants With Improved, Stable, and Worsened METAVIR Fibrosis Score

    Time frame: At Week 72

    METAVIR fibrosis score is categorized as, Improved: >= 1 category decrease in activity score; stable: no change in activity score; worsened: >= 1 category increase in activity score.

  13. Mean Change From Baseline in Fat Score at Week 72

    Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) to Week 72

    Grading categories for the fat scale were as follows: 1 = <5% hepatocytes; 2 = 6 - 33% hepatocytes; 3 = 34 - 66% hepatocytes; 4 = 67 - 100% hepatocytes.

  14. Percentage of Participants With Improved, Stable and Worsened Fat Score From Baseline to Week 72

    Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) to Week 72

    Fat scores are categorised as Improved: > 1 category decrease in fat scale; stable: no change in fat scale; worsened: >= 1 category increase in fat scale.

  15. Percentage of Participants With Non-zero Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Score

    Time frame: At Week 72

    The Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH) included an assessment of sinusoidal fibrosis, Mallory bodies, and hepatocyte ballooning (HB). Grading categories for the NASH scales were as: Sinusoidal fibrosis: 0 = absent; 1 = involvement of some lobules; 2 = involvement of most lobules, without diffuse interstitial sinusoidal collagen deposition; 3 = Involvement of most or all lobules;, with diffuse interstitial fibrosis involving some or most of the lobules Mallory bodies: 0 = absent; 1 = involvement of some lobules; 2 = involvement of most lobules; 3= involvement of most or all lobules; and Hepatocyte ballooning: 0 = absent; 1 = involvement of some lobules; 2 = involvement of most lobules; 3= involvement of most or all lobules.

  16. Mean Change in Fatigue Severity Scale Score and Fatigue Severity Scale Score Item 10 Visual Analog Scale Score From Baseline at Week 48 and Week 72

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 48 and Week 72

    The Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) is a 10-item self-report questionnaire designed to assess tiredness, lack of energy, or total body give-out. Participants were to react to nine statements regarding fatigue over the previous 2 weeks, each on a scale (1 = completely agree, 7 = completely disagree). The FSS is the average of the scores on the 9 questions; ranging from 1-7, with lower scores indicating less fatigue. In addition, participants were to react to how much fatigue they had in the past 2 weeks by marking on a visual analogue scale (VAS) labelled at one end with "no fatigue" ('0' being the best) and at the other end with "greater fatigue" ('100' being the worst). Longer distance on the scale from "no fatigue" indicated "greater fatigue". FSS values are presented based on questionnaire and visual analog scale. FSS values at week 48 and 72 are presented based on questionnaire and visual analog scale.

  17. Mean Change in 36-item Short Form Health Survey Total and Domain Scores From Baseline at Week 48 and 72

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0), Week 48 and Week 72

    The 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) is a 36-item self-report questionnaire that includes 8 domain scales The 8 domains are incorporated into 2 components: mental and physical. The mental component (MC) includes social functioning, role limitations-emotional, mental health, and vitality. The physical component (PC) includes physical functioning, role limitations-physical, bodily pain, and general health perception. Raw domain scores are transformed to a 0 to 100 scale, [0=worst score (or quality of life) and 100=best score]. Two summary scale scores were computed based on weighted combinations of the 8 domain scores (Physical and the Mental Component) where no minimum or maximum score; higher score indicate better health status. The difference between study groups in change from baseline in SF-36 score at week 48 and 72 was analysed.

  18. Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events

    Time frame: Up to Week 72

    An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An adverse event could therefore be any unfavorable or unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. Pre-existing conditions that worsened during the study were reported as adverse events. A serious adverse event (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization, or results in disability/incapacity, or congenital anomaly/birth defect.

  19. Number of Participants With Marked Abnormal Laboratory Parameters

    Time frame: Up to Week 72

    The below table includes participants with marked abnormal lab parameters. Standard reference ranges include: Hematocrit: (fraction) 0.37 - 0.49, Hemoglobin 130 - 180 g/L, Platelets 150 - 350 10^9/L, White Blood Cell (WBC) 4.5 - 11.0 10^9/L, Lymphocytes 1.00 - 4.80 10^9/L, Neutrophils 1.80 - 7.70 10^9/L, Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) 0-40 U/L, ALT 0 - 55 U/L, Total bilirubin 0 - 17 μmol/L, Thyroxine T4 58 - 140 nmol/L, Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH) 0.0 - 5.0 million units (mU)/L, Albumin 35.0 - 55.0 g/L, Chloride 100 - 108 mmol/L, Calcium 2.10 - 2.60 mmol/L, Phosphate 0.84 - 1.45 mmol/L, Uric acid 214 - 506 μmol/L.

  20. Number of Participants With Premature Withdrawals Due to Adverse Events or Laboratory Abnormalities

    Time frame: Up to Week 72

    The table below includes participants with premature withdrawals due to adverse events or laboratory abnormalities.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Hoffmann-La Roche

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Prospective, Multicenter, Open-label, Comparative, Efficacy Study of Pegasys® Plus Copegus® in Treatment-naïve Latino Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C-genotype 1, as Compared to Treatment-naïve Non- Latino Caucasian Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C-genotype 1

Important dates

Study start
2004
Primary completion
2007
Study completion
2007
First posted
Apr 7, 2005
Registry last updated
Jun 21, 2016

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.