Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07314996

Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Colon Cancer With Visceral Obesity

This study aims to elucidate whether there is a difference in long-term prognosis between laparoscopic surgery and open surgery in colon cancer patients with visceral obesity.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year–75 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine

Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310000, China

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

YuRONG Jiao

CONTACT

[email protected]

+86 13732206364

About this study

Study on Surgical Approaches for Colon Cancer Patients with Visceral Obesity

Colorectal cancer stands as a major malignant tumor threatening human health. Laparoscopic surgery has been widely adopted in colon cancer treatment, as it yields comparable survival outcomes to open surgery while offering the advantage of minimal invasiveness. However, with the global escalation of obesity, laparoscopic intervention becomes increasingly challenging in colon cancer patients with visceral obesity, potentially compromising surgical quality.

Notably, earlier landmark studies including COST, COLOR, and CLASICC have confirmed that laparoscopic surgery is non-inferior to open surgery in colon cancer patients. Nevertheless, these studies enrolled relatively lean patients with a Body Mass Index (BMI) below the average level of their respective regions; the COLOR study even excluded patients with a BMI exceeding 30 kg/m². Additionally, transverse colon cancer and splenic flexure colon cancer were excluded from these trials, rendering their data insufficiently representative of the growing population of obese colon cancer patients.

In contrast, the JCOG0404 study specifically demonstrated that colon cancer patients with a BMI ≥ 25 kg/m² had significantly poorer prognostic outcomes after laparoscopic surgery compared to open surgery. Further evidence from European waist-to-hip ratio studies and meta-analyses indicates that obese patients-especially those with abdominal obesity-pose greater surgical challenges. For such patients, laparoscopic surgery is associated with fewer harvested lymph nodes, higher conversion rates to open surgery, and potentially compromised surgical quality, which may ultimately lead to inferior long-term prognosis.

The Body Round Index (BRI), calculated using height and waist circumference, serves as a robust predictor of Visceral Fat Area (VFA). It exhibits superior performance to traditional anthropometric indicators such as BMI, waist circumference, and waist-to-hip ratio. Based on BRI and BMI data from Chinese and American populations, as well as clinical observations by the research team, patients with a BRI ≥ 5.0 present with significant visceral fat accumulation, which substantially increases the complexity of surgical procedures.

This study is designed as a prospective, international, multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-controlled trial to clarify whether open surgery is superior to laparoscopic surgery in terms of long-term outcomes for colon cancer patients with visceral obesity (defined as BRI ≥ 5.0). Eligible participants meeting all inclusion criteria will be enrolled and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the laparoscopic surgery group or the open surgery group. Both groups will undergo surgery adhering to the Complete Mesocolic Excision (CME) standard. Postoperatively, patients will be followed up for 5 years in accordance with the predefined follow-up protocol. The primary outcome measure is the 3-year disease-free survival rate, while secondary outcomes include specimen quality, 30-day postoperative complications and mortality.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Body Roundness Index (BRI) ≥ 5.0, with no laparoscopic surgery contraindications as assessed by the surgeon;
  • Pathologically confirmed colon adenocarcinoma, mucinous adenocarcinoma, or signet ring cell carcinoma;
  • Tumor lower edge > 12 cm from the anus as measured by colonoscopy, and the tumor lower edge not directly palpable by digital rectal examination;
  • Single primary lesion;
  • Aged 18 (inclusive) to 75 (inclusive) years;
  • Clinical stage T3/4Nany or T1-4N+ on chest non-contrast CT and abdominal enhanced CT, no distant metastasis, and resectable as judged by the surgeon;
  • Treatment-naive, no prior anti-tumor treatment;
  • Completed blood routine, liver and kidney function tests, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and carbohydrate antigen 199 (CA199) before randomization, with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score ≤ III;
  • Patient able to understand the study protocol and willing to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

  • Height and waist circumference data are unavailable;
  • Hereditary colorectal cancer (Lynch syndrome or Familial Adenomatous Polyposis [FAP]);
  • History of previous malignant neoplasm, with the exception of basal cell carcinoma/papillary thyroid carcinoma/various types of in situ cancers/micro-invasive early-stage lung cancer;
  • Acute exacerbation of major organ diseases (such as, but not limited to, COPD, coronary heart disease, and renal insufficiency) and/or severe acute infectious diseases (such as, but not limited to, hepatitis, pneumonia, and myocarditis);
  • The tumor presents with obstruction or is at high risk of obstruction, and/or there is bleeding and/or perforation, which may necessitate emergency surgery;
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding;
  • Inability to undergo contrast-enhanced CT scan;
  • Additional surgery after EMR or ESD;
  • Patients with unremitted severe mental illness, moderate or above cognitive impairment (MMSE ≤ 23 points), or those who have been hospitalized due to mood disorders in the past year or have unstable antipsychotic medication;
  • Patients with enlarged mesenteric root lymph nodes detected by preoperative CT or intraoperative exploration and suspected metastasis, or suspected metastasis in organs such as peritoneum or liver detected by intraoperative exploration;
  • Patients with a history of major abdominal surgery and severe adhesions precluding laparoscopic surgery upon laparoscopic exploration.

Treatment and study plan

Laparoscopic surgery

Procedure

It refers to the scenario where the necessary anatomy for colon cancer resection is performed using laparoscopic instruments. In laparoscopic surgery, conversion to open surgery is defined as making an abdominal wall incision before completing the predetermined necessary anatomical dissection.This study does not permit the use of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery, single-port laparoscopic surgery, or robotic surgery. The surgery will be performed according to standards of Complete Mesocolic Excision (CME).

Open Surgery

Procedure

It refers to a surgical procedure where the surgeon enters the abdominal cavity through an abdominal wall incision, gains adequate surgical space, and performs anatomical dissection under direct visual guidance, without relying on pneumoperitoneum or laparoscopic camera assistance.

Primary outcomes

  1. Three-year disease-free survival (DFS)

    Time frame: 36 months post-randomization

    Disease free survival(DFS)was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of locoregional recurrence, distant metastasis, any new primary cancer, or death from any cause

Secondary outcomes

  1. Length of colon resected

    Time frame: 2 weeks post operation.

    Follow the criteria described by Professor Quirke's criteria (BJS 2014, PMID: 25139143)

  2. Length of small bowel resected

    Time frame: 2 weeks post operation.

    Limited to right hemicolectomy. Follow the criteria described by Professor Quirke's criteria (BJS 2014, PMID: 25139143)

  3. Distance between tumor and closest arterial vascular division

    Time frame: 2 weeks post operation.

    Follow the criteria described by Professor Quirke's criteria (BJS 2014, PMID: 25139143)

  4. Distance between nearest bowel wall and the same vascular division

    Time frame: 2 weeks post operation.

    Follow the criteria described by Professor Quirke's criteria (BJS 2014, PMID: 25139143)

  5. Area of mesentery resected

    Time frame: 2 weeks post operation.

    Follow the criteria described by Professor Quirke's criteria (BJS 2014, PMID: 25139143)

  6. Mesocolic grading

    Time frame: 2 weeks post operation.

    Follow the criteria described by Professor West's criteria (Lancet Oncol 2008,PMID: 18667357). This classification system includes three grades: Mesocolic plane, Intramesocolic plane, Muscularis propria plane.

  7. Number of lymph nodes harvested

    Time frame: 2 weeks post operation.

    Follow the criteria described by Professor Quirke's criteria (BJS 2014, PMID: 25139143)

  8. Incidence of intraoperative complications

    Time frame: From the start of surgical skin incision to the completion of skin suturing.

    Intraoperative complications refer to accidents that occur during surgery. Complications may cause harm to the patient or threaten their life safety (such as iatrogenic intestinal injury, vascular injury or other organ injuries, severe bleeding, cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events or respiratory dysfunction that lead to the interruption of surgery, etc.). These events may result in the prolongation of the surgery, changes in the surgical method, unplanned medical interventions, or even endanger the patient's life.

    The study provides classifications and definitions of common complications. For complications not included in the classification table, refer to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) V6.0.

  9. Incidence 30-day postoperative complications

    Time frame: From the completion of skin suturing to 30 days after surgery.

    Postoperative complications refer to symptoms and signs diagnosed through imaging or clinical evaluation after surgery .

    The study provides classifications and definitions of common complications. For complications not included in the classification table, refer to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) V6.0.

Other outcomes

  1. Quality of life of patients

    Time frame: The survey time points included: preoperatively, 5 days postoperatively, 1 month postoperatively, and 12 months postoperatively.

    The EORTC QLQ-C30 scale was adopted. The corresponding language version was selected according to the patient's place of origin.

  2. Incidence of postoperative abdominal wall incisional hernia

    Time frame: 24-36 months postoperatively

    Diagnostic criteria: The surgical incision area in this study is characterized by an abdominal wall defect with abdominal contents protruding outward through the defect; physical examination shows a significant bulging of the hernia mass when standing or when abdominal pressure increases (e.g., coughing, breath-holding), and the hernia mass can spontaneously reduce when lying down (excluding incarcerated/strangulated incisional hernias). The above lesions must be clearly confirmed by abdominal computed tomography (CT) examination (including three-dimensional reconstruction). (Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of abdominal wall incision hernia (2024 edition), PMID: 39794142)

  3. 5-year overall survival rate

    Time frame: 5 years from randomization.

    The proportion of patients who survived 5 years from randomization.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Colon Cancer With Visceral Obesity

Acronym: LOVO

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2031
Study completion
2033
First posted
Jan 2, 2026
Registry last updated
Jun 3, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.