Faculty of medicine
ShebinElkom, Menoufia, 32511, Egypt
NCT Number: NCT03826446
Right sided hemicolectomy is the standard type of operation for cancers in the caecum, the ascending colon.The aim of this study was to compare between laparoscopic and open complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation in right colon cancer.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me50 year–70 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
ShebinElkom, Menoufia, 32511, Egypt
Colorectal cancer incidence and mortality rates vary markedly around the world. Globally, colorectal cancer is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer in males and the second in females, with 1.65 million new cases and almost 835,000 deaths in 2015. Rates are substantially higher in males than in females.
The right colon has a large caliber, a thin wall, and its contents are liquid; thus, obstruction is a late event. Bleeding is usually occult. Fatigue and weakness caused by severe anemia may be the only complaints. Tumors sometimes grow large enough to be palpable through the abdominal wall before other symptoms appear.
Curative treatment for right colon cancer includes resection of the tumor-bearing bowel segment. There are standard types of operations, depending on the location of the tumor. The types of standard resections are based on the knowledge of lymphatic drainage and lymph node anatomy.
Right sided hemicolectomy is the standard type of operation for cancers in the caecum, the ascending colon. In 2009, Hohenberger, a German scholar, proposed the term of complete mesocolic excision (CME), whose basic theory is mainly composed of two concepts in fetal anatomy and surgical oncology: sharp dissection of the mesocolic plane and the parietal plane. CME helps to keep the colonic mesentery intact, clarify the dissected area from central lymph nodes, emphasize the importance of transecting colon-feeding blood at the root, and increase the range of longitudinal enterotomy. Thus, CME provides a standardization of surgeries for colon cancer.
Traditionally, approach to right colon cancer is through open exploration but this approach has more blood loss, prolonged postoperative hospital stay, sever postoperative pain and delayed recovery..
Laparoscopic right colectomy (LRC) for colon cancer became a well-established technique in the surgical armamentarium of colorectal operations. It has well proved advantages: reduction in postoperative pain, time to return of bowel function, and length of hospital stay.
The purpose of the present study was to compare between laparoscopic and open complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation in right colon cancer as regards technical feasibility, advantages and disadvantages of both procedures.
This was prospective randomized study and was carried out on 60 patients diagnosed as operable right sided colon cancer and the patients will be divided into two groups:
Group I: Open right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation.
Group II: Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation.
All patients were subjected to preoperative assessment in the form of:
Operative technique
In patients of group I:
In patients of group II:
Intraoperatively, all patients will be assessed for:
Postoperative follow up:
Patients will be followed up by the standardized follow up protocol. They will be examined by the outpatient setting after:
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
laparoscopic and open complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation in right colon cancer.
Time frame: 1-3 years
Comparing the operative time between laparoscopic and open complete mesocolic excision with central artery ligation groups
Time frame: 1-3 years
Comparing the incision length between laparoscopic and open complete mesocolic excision with central artery ligation groups
Time frame: 1-3
Comparing the hospital stay duration between laparoscopic and open complete mesocolic excision with central artery ligation groups
Time frame: 1-3 years
Comparing the histopathological findings between laparoscopic and open complete mesocolic excision with central artery ligation groups
Time frame: 1-3 years
Comparing the post-operative complications between laparoscopic and open complete mesocolic excision with central artery ligation groups
Time frame: 1-3 years
Comparing the recurrence rate between laparoscopic and open complete mesocolic excision with central artery ligation groups
Menoufia University
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07736131
Colon Cancer, Colonic Diseases
View Trial DetailsNCT05513742
Colon Cancer, Colonic Diseases
Hot Springs, Arkansas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07725692
Anastomotic Leak, Colon Cancer
Alexandria, Please Select, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT05538195
Colon Cancer, Colonic Diseases
Henan, China
View Trial Details