NCT Number: NCT02911584
Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy Versus POPS in the Management of Pelvic Prolapse
This is the first study comparing the laparoscopic sacropexy with Pelvic Organs Prolapse Suspension (POPS) to treat pelvic organ prolapse. This prospective randomized surgical trial is designed to test the clinical and functional effects of the two different laparoscopic procedures in terms of anatomical correction of the prolapse, post-operative and long term morbidity, rate of recurrence and subjective satisfaction of the patient evaluated by a quality of life questionnaire.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeKey information
Conditions
Age range
30 year–70 year
Sex eligibility
Female
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Not applicable
Who can participate
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
- Patients who required surgical treatment for symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse stage ≥ 2 with or without stress urinary incontinence
Exclusion criteria
- Age > 70 years
- Severe cardiovascular or respiratory disease
- Pregnancy
- Previous surgical procedure for POP correction
Treatment and study plan
Primary outcomes
-
Number of patients with anatomical correction of the prolapse
Time frame: up to 6 months
Anatomical correction of the prolapse evaluated by gynecological visit
Secondary outcomes
-
Rate of recurrence
Time frame: up to 6 months
-
Post operative quality of life
Time frame: up to 6 months
Subjective satisfaction of the patient evaluated by a quality of life questionnaire.
Sponsors and collaborators
Lead sponsor
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS
Other
Collaborators
- Miulli General Hospital
Registry information
Official study title
Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy Versus POPS in the Surgical Management of Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Prospective Randomized Trial
Important dates
- Study start
- 2016
- Primary completion
- 2017
- Study completion
- 2017
- First posted
- Sep 22, 2016
- Registry last updated
- Dec 6, 2017
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Related clinical trials
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
Vaginal Microbiota as a Decisive Factor in Vaginal Prosthetic Surgery
NCT02890498
Pathological Conditions, Anatomical, Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
Nîmes, France
View Trial DetailsPhysical Therapy Intervention for Pelvic Organ Prolapses
NCT06532292
Pathological Conditions, Anatomical, Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
Taipei, Taiwan
View Trial DetailsCross-Shaped Vaginal Pessary for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT07554651
Female Urogenital Diseases, Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
Dnipro, Ukraine
View Trial DetailsUnilateral Versus Bilateral High Uterosacral Ligament Suspension Following vNOTES Hysterectomy for Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Prospective Study
NCT07552337
Pathological Conditions, Anatomical, Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
Diyarbakır, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details