Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05252637

Laparoscopic Fascial Duplication Plus Sacral Colpopexy in Posterior Vaginal Prolapse

A Randomized Clinical Trial on Laparoscopic Fascial posterior vaginal duplication with absorbable sutures plus sacral colpopexy mesh placement VS sacral colpopexy isolated for vaginal posterior prolapse

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

Up to 80 year

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Pia Fondazione Panico

Tricase, Lecce, 73039, Italy

About this study

Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy is the gold standard procedure for pelvic organ prolapse. Anyway, vaginal fascial surgery is already considered the most appropriate for posterior vaginal prolapse. This prospective randomized pilot study is aimed to verify if the combination of laparoscopic duplication of vaginal fascia with absorbable sutures could increase benefits of sacral colpopexy on the posterior vagina in terms of prolapse (evaluating 1 year POP-Q).

Secondary endpoints of this comparison are incidence of intra- or postoperative complications estimated blood loss, postoperative pain (evaluated by VAS), days of hospitalization and costs for the health care system.

Statistical Analysis and Study Design This is a single Institution prospective randomized clinical trial conducted at the Pia Fondazione Panico of Tricase, Italy.

To have an imbalanced results and to reduce any bias, a randomization list has been checked.

Probability (p) values will be considered to be statistically significant at the <0.05 level.

There will be recruited 32 patients for Groups. Group 1: Laparoscopic Fascial posterior vaginal duplication with absorbable sutures plus sacral colpopexy mesh placement Vs Group 2: Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy isolated for vaginal posterior prolapse.

All patients will be adequately informed and inserted in the study only after having read and signed an informed consent. Diagnostic, clinical and surgical data of each patient will be prospectively recorded. At the end of the procedure, a schedule will be compiled with intraoperative data. All clinical and histologic data will be recorded prospectively using a database. Pain associated with the procedure will be evaluated by a subjective assessment (analysis of VAS scale values reported by patients at 8 and 24 hours after surgery). Post-operative complications will be evaluated during the first 30 days after surgery according to Dindo's classification.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Age ≤ 80 years Patient's informed consent American Society of Anesthesiologists: < class III or IV

No previous major abdominal surgical procedures POP-Q stage > or =III for posterior compartment. No uterine cervix dysplasia or endometrial disorders. No uterine size larger than conform 10 weeks gestation

Treatment and study plan

Laparoscopic Fascial Posterior Vagina Duplication

Procedure

Laparoscopic Fascial Posterior Vagina Duplication with absorbable sutures for posterior prolapse (plus standard Sacral Colpopexy)

Primary outcomes

  1. POP-Q

    Time frame: 1 year

    POP-Q evaluation

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Azienda Ospedaliera Cardinale G. Panico

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Laparoscopic Fascial Duplication Plus Sacral Colpopexy in Posterior Vaginal Prolapse: a Randomized Clinical Trial

Important dates

Study start
2019
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2022
First posted
Feb 23, 2022
Registry last updated
Feb 23, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.