Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00726622

Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection or Open Resection in Treating Patients With Rectal Cancer

This study is being done to compare two types of surgery currently used for rectal cancer. The two types of surgery are laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection and open laparotomy rectal resection. Although laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection is being used for rectal cancer in some medical centers, the effectiveness of this type of surgery compared to open surgery is unknown. The study will compare the safety and effectiveness of the surgeries, recovery from surgery in the hospital, overall recovery from surgery and cancer outcome.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

St. Paul's Hospital at Providence Health Care - Vancouver, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Loading trial locations.

About this study

This is a multicenter study. Patients eligible for this trial will have completed 5FU based neoadjuvant chemotherapy/radiation therapy per the institution's standard of care or IRB approved clinical trial. Patients may be registered/randomized anytime after completion of neoadjuvant therapy, but surgery must occur within 4-12 weeks (28-84 days) after completion of neoadjuvant therapy. Patients are stratified according to the site of the primary tumor (high, middle or low rectum), registering surgeon, and planned operative procedure (low anterior resection or abdominal perineal resection). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms. Please see the arms section for more details. The primary and secondary objectives are listed below.

Primary Objective:

To test the hypothesis that laparoscopic-assisted resection for rectal cancer is not inferior to open rectal resection, based on a composite primary endpoint of oncologic factors which are indicative of a safe and feasible operation.

Secondary Objectives:

  • To assess patient-related benefit of laparoscopic-assisted resection for rectal cancer vs.

open rectal resection (blood loss, length of stay, pain medicine utilization)

  • To assess disease free survival and local pelvic recurrence at two years.
  • To assess quality of life, sexual function, bowel and stoma function at scheduled time points throughout the trial.

Patients will be evaluated after surgery to determine the need for subsequent care based on the final pathology. Patients should not start treatment on any other investigative trial involving intervention or invasive diagnostic procedures ≤ 30 days following surgery to enable a complete evaluation of post-operative adverse events and complications occurring within 30 days of surgery. Patients are followed periodically for up to 5 years post surgery.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Eligibility Criteria:

  • Histologic diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the rectum (≤ 12 cm from the anal verge)
  • T3, N0, M0, T1-3, N1-2, M0 disease as determined by pre-neoadjuvant therapy CT scans and pelvic MRI or transrectal ultrasound. Patients with T4 disease are not eligible.
  • Completion of pre-operative 5FU based chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy. Capecitabine may be substituted for 5FU.
  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • ECOG (Zubrod) Performance Status ≤ 2
  • Body Mass Index (BMI) ≤ 34
  • No evidence of conditions that would preclude use of a laparoscopic approach (eg, multiple previous major laparotomies, severe adhesions)
  • No systemic disease (cardiovascular, renal, hepatic) that would preclude surgery. No other severe incapacitating disease:
  • ASA IV: A patient with severe systemic disease that is a constant threat to life. OR
  • ASA V: A moribund patient who is not expected to survive without the operation.
  • No concurrent or previous invasive pelvic malignancy (cervical, uterine and rectal) within five years prior to registration
  • No history of psychiatric or addictive disorders or other conditions that, in the opinion of the investigator, would preclude the patient from meeting the study requirements.

NOTE: Incompetent patients are not eligible for this trial.

Treatment and study plan

Open laparotomy and rectal resection

Procedure

Patients undergo open laparotomy and rectal resection.

Laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection

Procedure

Patients undergo laparoscopic-assisted rectal resection.

Primary outcomes

  1. Comparing Laparoscopic-assisted Resection to Open Rectal Resection for Rectal Cancer as Measured by the Percentage of Patients With Successful Resection Based on Pathological Evaluation.

    Time frame: At time of Surgery

    The primary endpoint will be a composite endpoint of oncologic factors which are indicative of an adequate surgical resection based on pathologic evaluation.

    Primary endpoint parameters:

    • Circumferential margin > 1 mm
    • Negative distal margin
    • Completeness of total mesorectal excision (TME) A complete TME is a rectal resection specimen that has an intact mesorectum and covering peritoneal envelope all the way to the level of rectal transection with no coning in of the mesorectum above the point of transection. The surface of the peritoneal covering should be smooth and shiny with no defects exposing the underlying fat.

    All three criteria must be met for a resection to be deemed adequate. Laparoscopic-assisted resection will be compared to Open rectal resection to determine if it is non-inferior.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Completeness of Total Mesorectal Excision (Complete or Nearly Complete)

    Time frame: At time of surgery

    Complete total mesorectal excision was defined as a rectal resection specimen having smooth surface of mesorectal fascia with all fat contained in the enveloping fascia to a level 5 cm below the tumor for tumor-specific total mesorectal excision for upper rectal cancer, or the entire mesorectal envelope present for low rectal cancer. Nearly complete was defined as a rectal resection specimen having the mesorectal envelope intact except for defects no more than 5 mm deep, with no loss of mesorectal fat.

    The percentage of patients with complete or nearly complete mesorectal excision was calculated along with the binomial 95% CI.

  2. Negative Distal Resected Margin

    Time frame: At time of surgery

    The percentage of patients with negative distal margin (>1 mm between the closest tumor to the cut edge of the tissue) was calculated along with binomial 95% confidence intervals.

  3. Circumferential Margin > 1 mm

    Time frame: At time of surgery

    The distance between the closest tumor to the cut edge of the tissue was measure post-resection. The percentage of patients with >1mm between the closest tumor to the cut edge of the tissue was calculated with a binomial 95% confidence interval.

  4. Length of Stay

    Time frame: Two weeks post-surgery

    The mean number of days required post-surgery to the when the patient was released from the hospital was calculated.

  5. Use of Pain Medication

    Time frame: Two weeks post-surgery

    The number of days patients received parenteral narcotics post-surgery were counted.

  6. Operative Times

    Time frame: During surgery

    Open to close operative time.

  7. Disease-free Survival

    Time frame: Up to 2 years post surgery

  8. Local Pelvic Recurrence Rates

    Time frame: Up to 2 years post surgery

  9. Overall Survival

    Time frame: Up to 5 years post surgery

  10. Quality of Life and Sexual Function

    Time frame: Up to 5 years post surgery

  11. Bowel Function

    Time frame: Up to 5 years post surgery

  12. Bowel and Stoma Function

    Time frame: Up to 5 years post surgery

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology

Other

Collaborators

  • National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Registry information

Official study title

A Phase III Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection Versus Open Resection for Rectal Cancer

Important dates

Study start
2008
Primary completion
2013
Study completion
2019
First posted
Aug 1, 2008
Registry last updated
May 7, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.