Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02151786

Lansoprazole Intravenous 30 mg Specified Drug-use Survey [Hemostatic Effect/Rebleeding Rate]

The purpose of this survey is to evaluate the safety (i.e., frequency of adverse events) and efficacy (i.e., hemostatic effect, rate of rebleeding after confirmation of hemostasis) of administration of lansoprazole intravenous 30 milligram (mg) (Takepron Intravenous 30 mg) to a large number of patients in daily medical practice.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

This survey was designed to evaluate the safety (i.e., frequency of adverse events) and efficacy (i.e., hemostatic effect, rate of rebleeding after confirmation of hemostasis) of administration of lansoprazole intravenous 30 mg (Takepron Intravenous 30 mg) to a large number of participants in daily medical practice.

For adults, 30 mg of lansoprazole is typically mixed in physiological saline (JP) or 5% glucose solution for injection (JP) and administered twice daily by drip infusion or dissolved in 20 mL of physiological saline (JP) or 5% glucose solution for injection (JP) and administered twice daily by direct slow intravenous injection.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with the following diseases for whom oral administration is not feasible:

Gastric ulcer, duodenal ulcer, acute stress gastritis, and acute gastric mucosal lesion (all of which should be accompanied by bleeding).

Exclusion criteria

-

Treatment and study plan

Lansoprazole

Drug

Lansoprazole intravenous 30 mg

Other names: Takepron Intravenous 30 mg

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants Reporting One or More Adverse Drug Reactions

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 9

    Adverse drug reactions are defined as adverse events (AEs) which are in the investigator's opinion of causal relationship to the study treatment. AEs are defined as any unfavorable and unintended signs, symptoms or diseases temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product reported from the first dose of study drug to the last dose of study drug.

  2. Number of Participants Reporting One or More Serious Adverse Drug Reactions

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 9

    Serious adverse drug reactions are defined as serious adverse events (SAEs) which are in the investigator's opinion of causal relationship to the study treatment. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Observed Hemostatic Effect

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 9

    Hemostatic effect was categorized on the basis of degree of improvement as: markedly improved, moderately improved, slightly improved and poor in the participants with observed hemostatic effect. Efficacy rate was reported as percentage of participants showing efficacy and was calculated as the sum of percentage of number of participants reporting markedly improved + moderately improved + slightly improved divided by the percentage of total number of participants with observed hemostatic effect.

  2. Percentage of Participants With Confirmed Hemostatic Effect

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 9

    Hemostatic effect was categorized on the basis of degree of improvement as: markedly improved, moderately improved, slightly improved and poor in the participants with confirmed hemostatic effect by endoscopy. Efficacy rate was reported as percentage of participants showing efficacy and was calculated as the sum of percentage of number of participants reporting markedly improved + moderately improved + slightly improved divided by the percentage of total number of participants with confirmed hemostatic effect.

  3. Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Rebleeding After Observed Hemostatic Effect

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 9

    Rebleeding rate was reported as percentage of participants who experienced rebleeding after observed hemostasis and was calculated during the period starting from baseline until the completion of treatment with lansoprazole. It was calculated by dividing the percentage of the number of participants who experienced rebleeding after hemostasis divided by the total number of participants with observed hemostasis.

  4. Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Rebleeding After Confirmed Hemostatic Effect

    Time frame: Baseline up to Week 9

    Rebleeding rate was reported as percentage of participants who experienced rebleeding after confirmed hemostasis by endoscopy and was calculated during the period starting from baseline until the completion of treatment with lansoprazole. It was calculated by dividing the percentage of the number of participants who experienced rebleeding after hemostasis divided by the total number of participants with confirmed hemostasis.

  5. Percentage of Participants With Observed Hemostatic Effect Who Experienced Rebleeding After the Completion of Treatment

    Time frame: Week 8 after the last dose of study drug (Week 17)

    Rebleeding rate was reported as percentage of participants who experienced rebleeding after observed hemostasis and was calculated at 8 weeks after the completion of treatment with lansoprazole. It was calculated by dividing the percentage of the number of participants who experienced rebleeding after hemostasis divided by the total number of participants with observed hemostasis.

  6. Percentage of Participants With Confirmed Hemostatic Effect Who Experienced Rebleeding After the Completion of Treatment

    Time frame: Week 8 after the last dose of study drug (Week 17)

    Rebleeding rate was reported as percentage of participants who experienced rebleeding after confirmed hemostasis by endoscopy and was calculated at 8 weeks after the completion of treatment with lansoprazole. It was calculated by dividing the percentage of the number of participants who experienced rebleeding after hemostasis divided by the total number of participants with confirmed hemostasis.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Takeda

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

Takepron Intravenous 30 mg Specified Drug-use Survey [Hemostatic Effect/Rebleeding Rate]

Important dates

Study start
2007
Primary completion
2010
Study completion
2010
First posted
May 30, 2014
Registry last updated
Feb 23, 2016

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.