Hospital de Clinicas
Montevideo, Uruguay
NCT Number: NCT05726344
Colonoscopy is the gold standard in bowel assessment when there is suspicion of colon and rectum pathology. Bowel cleansing is necessary to ensure an optimal visualization of colonic mucosa, allowing this form of detection and removal of polyps. Nowadays international recommendations have multiple bowel preparations. There are differences among them regarding adherence, tolerance and adverse effects. Lactulose (LAC) is widely used in treating constipation. However, there are some randomized clinical assays using LAC as bowel preparation with excellent results according to bowel preparation and tolerance scales. Adherence to bowel preparation significantly affects the result in the endoscopic study.
Safety of polyethylene glycol (PEG) formulations has been validated in several studies, it presents little severe side effects and the advantage of its applicability to patients with several comorbidities (heart, liver and kidney without water deprivation). However, its main disadvantage lies in the need to ingest large amounts of liquid (3-4L), generating intolerance thereto in 15%-45% of patients.
Bowel cleansing preparation with PEG is widely used in clinical practice. Considering that according to international studies reporting better tolerance and adherence with LAC; it is suggested to compare the level of bowel preparation, tolerance and adherence between two groups with LAC and PEG.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Montevideo, Uruguay
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
4 tablets of Bisacodyl (5 mg) + 250 mL (162.5g lactulose) of lactulose + 600 mL of water + 2 L of water
Other names: Bisacodyl 20 mg, Water 600 mL
4 tablets of Bisacodyl (5 mg) + 3 bottles Polyethylene Glycol 3350 (Polyethylene glycol 3350 60 g; sodium chloride 1.46 g; potassium chloride 745 mg; Sodium bicarbonate 1.68 g; anhydrous sodium sulfate 5.68 g; pineapple flavoring 483 mg) + 3 L of water
Other names: Bisacodyl 20 mg, Water 3 L
Time frame: 6 months
Compare the level of bowel preparation (by Boston Bowel Preparation Scale) between two groups with lactulose and Polyethylene Glycol.
The minimum and maximum value is 0 and 9, respectively. A proper preparation is consider a Boston Bowel Preparation Scale ≥ 2 scores in each colonic segment. Unsuitable preparation a Boston Bowel Preparation Scale < 2 scores in any of the segments.
Score 0: is considered a segment of unprepared colon with mucosa that cannot be observed given the presence of solid stool which does not disappear after cleansing.
Score 1: part of the colonic mucosa is observed; other areas cannot be suitably assessed given the presence of staining, residual matter and/or opaque liquid.
Score 2: little remaining residual matter and small matter fragments which do not prevent correct visualization of colonic mucosa in said segment.
Score 3: colonic mucosa which can be entirely observed with no residual matter nor small fragments of matter and opaque liquid.
Time frame: 7 months
Two researchers shall review the endoscopic study videos and they shall complete the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale inter-observer questionnaire. Results obtained by the endoscopist in charge of the study and the observers shall be compared so as to establish inter-observer variability. Researchers shall analyze one month later again all colonoscopies recorded thus establishing Boston Bowel Preparation Scale of each endoscopy. Then results previously established shall be compared so as to establish intra-observer variability.
The minimum and maximum value is 0 and 9, respectively. A proper preparation is consider a Boston Bowel Preparation Scale ≥ 2 scores in each colonic segment. Unsuitable preparation a Boston Bowel Preparation Scale < 2 scores in any of the segments.
Time frame: 6 months
To assess tolerance it will be considered: good tolerance those patients with 3 or less symptoms with no major criterion; regular tolerance those patients with 4-5 symptoms, without major criterion and bad tolerance those patients with 6 or more symptoms or 1 or more major criteria.
Time frame: 6 months
To assess adherence it shall be assessed if the preparation was completed as well as the will to repeat the same preparation in the future.
Time frame: 6 months
To assess side effects of both preparations that will be considered: nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain or bloating, sickness, lipothymia, palpitations, precordial pain, insomnia, anal pain or burning, dry mouth, tinnitus, unpleasant taste.
Time frame: 6 months
It correspond to the number of adenomas/adenocarcinomas (histological diagnosis) divided by the total number of colonoscopies performed times 100.
Time frame: 6 months
It correspond to the number colonoscopies visualizing ileocecal valve divided by the total number of colonoscopies performed times 100.
Hospital de Clínicas Dr. Manuel Quintela
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06748638
Bowel Preparation, Lactulose
Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
View Trial DetailsNCT06995586
Antioxidants, CABG
Stróvolos, Nicosia, Cyprus
View Trial DetailsNCT06192394
Behavior, Bowel Preparation
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06444724
Bowel Preparation, Colonoscopy
Bangkok Noi, Bangkok, Thailand
View Trial Details