Helsinki University Hospital
Helsinki, 00350, Finland
NCT Number: NCT02011308
The purpose of this study is to compare safety and efficacy of Green Light PVP (Photoselective Vaporisation of the Prostate) compared to TUR-P.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me40 year–90 year
Male
Interventional
Not applicable
Helsinki, 00350, Finland
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Laser vs TURP
Laser vs TURP
Time frame: 12 months
symptom
Time frame: 3, 6 and 12 months
symptom
Time frame: 3, 6 and 12 months
Time frame: 3, 6 and 12 months
Time frame: Postoperative recovery
Time frame: Postoperative recovery
Time frame: Time of operation
Time frame: 12 months
Erectile Dysfunction
Time frame: 12 months
Measurement of prostate size
University of Helsinki
Other
The Effect of KTP Green Light Prostatectomy (120W) Compared With TUR-P When Treating Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH), a Prospective Randomized Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07587333
BPH (Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia), Genital Diseases
Banī Suwayf, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07134907
BPH (Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia), Genital Diseases
Hefei, Anhui, China
View Trial DetailsNCT06901115
BPH (Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia), Genital Diseases
Shebin El-Kom, Menoufia, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT06753071
BPH (Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia), Female Urogenital Diseases
Shebin El-Kom, Menoufia, Egypt
View Trial Details