KRX-0502
DrugOral ferric citrate with meals
Other names: ferric citrate
NCT Number: NCT03236246
The objectives of this study are to assess the long-term efficacy and safety of different dose regimens of KRX-0502 in the treatment of iron deficiency anemia (IDA) in adult subjects with non-dialysis dependent chronic kidney disease (CKD).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
Arizona Kidney Disease and Hypertension center: AKDHC Medical Research Services, LLC, Phoenix, Arizona, United States
This is a Phase 4, 48-week, randomized, open-label, multicenter clinical study comprised of 2 periods: a 24-week Dose Titration Period, followed by a 24-week Dose Maintenance Period. The study will consist of 12 scheduled clinic visits over a period of 48 weeks and additional visits as needed.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Oral ferric citrate with meals
Other names: ferric citrate
Time frame: Baseline; Week 24
Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Estimates are from a mixed model of repeated measures (MMRM), including an intercept term and covariates for randomized treatment, visit, treatment by visit interaction, Baseline value, and Baseline value by visit interaction. The Kenward-Roger method was used along with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Time frame: Baseline; Week 48
Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Estimates are from an MMRM, including an intercept term and covariates for randomized treatment, visit, treatment by visit interaction, Baseline value, and Baseline value by visit interaction. The Kenward-Roger method was used along with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Time frame: from Randomization to Week 24
The Kaplan-Meier estimator of the survival function of time from randomization to the first increase from Baseline Hgb of at least 0.5 g/dL for each of the two starting dose treatment groups were obtained.
Time frame: Baseline; Week 24
Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Estimates are from an MMRM, including an intercept term and covariates for randomized treatment, visit, treatment by visit interaction, Baseline value, and Baseline value by visit interaction. The Kenward-Roger method was used along with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Time frame: Baseline; Week 48
Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Estimates are from an MMRM, including an intercept term and covariates for randomized treatment, visit, treatment by visit interaction, Baseline value, and Baseline value by visit interaction. The Kenward-Roger method was used along with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Time frame: Baseline; Week 24
Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Estimates are from an MMRM, including an intercept term and covariates for randomized treatment, visit, treatment by visit interaction, Baseline value, and Baseline value by visit interaction. The Kenward-Roger method was used along with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Time frame: Baseline; Week 48
Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Estimates are from an MMRM, including an intercept term and covariates for randomized treatment, visit, treatment by visit interaction, Baseline value, and Baseline value by visit interaction. The Kenward-Roger method was used along with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Time frame: Baseline; up to Week 24
Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Estimates are from an MMRM, including an intercept term and covariates for randomized treatment, visit, treatment by visit interaction, Baseline value, and Baseline value by visit interaction. The Kenward-Roger method was used along with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Time frame: Baseline; Week 48
Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Estimates are from an MMRM, including an intercept term and covariates for randomized treatment, visit, treatment by visit interaction, Baseline value, and Baseline value by visit interaction. The Kenward-Roger method was used along with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Time frame: Baseline; Week 24
Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Estimates are from an MMRM, including an intercept term and covariates for randomized treatment, visit, treatment by visit interaction, Baseline value, and Baseline value by visit interaction. The Kenward-Roger method was used along with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Time frame: Baseline; Week 48
Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Estimates are from an MMRM, including an intercept term and covariates for randomized treatment, visit, treatment by visit interaction, Baseline value, and Baseline value by visit interaction. The Kenward-Roger method was used along with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Time frame: Baseline; Week 24
Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Estimates are from an MMRM, including an intercept term and covariates for randomized treatment, visit, treatment by visit interaction, Baseline value, and Baseline value by visit interaction. The Kenward-Roger method was used along with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Time frame: Baseline; Week 48
Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Estimates are from an MMRM, including an intercept term and covariates for randomized treatment, visit, treatment by visit interaction, Baseline value, and Baseline value by visit interaction. The Kenward-Roger method was used along with an unstructured covariance matrix.
Time frame: Baseline; Week 24
Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Estimates obtained using a common slope analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model which includes the Baseline laboratory parameter as a covariate, randomized treatment group, and a random error term.
Time frame: Baseline; Week 48
Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Estimates obtained using an uncommon slope ANCOVA model which includes the Baseline laboratory parameter as a covariate, randomized treatment group, randomized treatment group by Baseline interaction, and a random error term.
Time frame: Baseline; Week 24
Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Estimates obtained using an uncommon slope ANCOVA model which includes the Baseline laboratory parameter as a covariate, randomized treatment group, randomized treatment group by Baseline interaction, and a random error term.
Time frame: Baseline; Week 48
Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Estimates obtained using an uncommon slope ANCOVA model which includes the Baseline laboratory parameter as a covariate, randomized treatment group, randomized treatment group by Baseline interaction, and a random error term.
Time frame: Baseline; Week 24
Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Estimates obtained using a common slope ANCOVA model which includes the Baseline laboratory parameter as a covariate, randomized treatment group, and a random error term.
Time frame: Baseline; Week 48
Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Estimates obtained using an uncommon slope ANCOVA model which includes the Baseline laboratory parameter as a covariate, randomized treatment group, randomized treatment group by Baseline interaction, and a random error term.
Time frame: Baseline; Week 24
Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. The WPAI is a questionnaire to evaluate the effect of anemia associated with Chronic Kidney Disease on the ability to work and perform regular activities. Scores are presented as percentages (multiplying the scores by 100), with 0% representing no impact and 100% representing complete impact.
Time frame: Baseline; Week 48
Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. The WPAI is a questionnaire to evaluate the effect of anemia associated with Chronic Kidney Disease on the ability to work and perform regular activities. Scores are presented as percentages (multiplying the scores by 100), with 0% representing no impact and 100% representing complete impact.
Time frame: Baseline; Week 24
Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. The WPAI is a questionnaire to evaluate the effect of anemia associated with Chronic Kidney Disease on the ability to work and perform regular activities. Scores are presented as percentages (multiplying the scores by 100), with 0% representing no impact and 100% representing complete impact.
Time frame: Baseline; Week 48
Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. The WPAI is a questionnaire to evaluate the effect of anemia associated with Chronic Kidney Disease on the ability to work and perform regular activities. Scores are presented as percentages (multiplying the scores by 100), with 0% representing no impact and 100% representing complete impact.
Time frame: Baseline; Week 24
Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Participants were asked to respond to 13 statements (as they apply to the last 7 days) that other people with the same illness said are important with one of the following: 0, not at all; 1, a little bit; 2, somewhat; 3, quite a bit; 4, very much. All individual items were summed to create a single fatigue score ranging from 0 to 52. Higher scores indicate greater fatigue.
Time frame: Baseline; Week 48
Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Participants were asked to respond to 13 statements (as they apply to the last 7 days) that other people with the same illness said are important with one of the following: 0, not at all; 1, a little bit; 2, somewhat; 3, quite a bit; 4, very much. All individual items were summed to create a single fatigue score ranging from 0 to 52. Higher scores indicate greater fatigue.
Time frame: up to Week 48
A hospitalization is defined as admission to the hospital.
Time frame: up to Week 48
A hospitalization is defined as admission to the hospital.
Time frame: up to Week 48
Treatment-emergent adverse events are defined as adverse events that began after the first administration of study medication or pre-existing conditions that worsened after the first dose of study medication.
Keryx Biopharmaceuticals
Industry
Study of KRX-0502 (Ferric Citrate) Dose Regimens in Subjects With Non-Dialysis Dependent Chronic Kidney Disease and Iron-Deficiency Anemia
Acronym: COMPASS
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03106298
Anemia, Anemia, Hypochromic
Chicago, Illinois, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05240677
Anemia, Anemia, Hypochromic
Zagazig, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT03938324
Anemia, Anemia, Hemolytic
Durham, North Carolina, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06071143
Chronic Disease, Chronic Kidney Diseases
Daejeon, Chungcheongnam-do, South Korea
View Trial Details