TUM Klinikum Deutsches Herzzentrum
München, Bavaria, 80636, Germany
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Markus Krane, Prof. Dr. med.
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
NCT Number: NCT07619872
KONECTION is a prospective, observational, single-arm, multicenter study designed to collect real-world clinical outcomes in up to 250 participants who will receive the KONECT RESILIA aortic valved conduit, Model 11060A.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
München, Bavaria, 80636, Germany
Location status: Recruiting
Markus Krane, Prof. Dr. med.
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Subjects in the KONECTION study will be enrolled at up to 20 sites in Europe and Canada. The population will be participants requiring replacement of their diseased native or prosthetic aortic valve, and the associated repair or replacement of a damaged or diseased ascending aorta.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Surgical replacement of the aortic valve and ascending aorta with the Edwards KONECT RESILIA AVC
Time frame: ≤ 30 days
Participants' freedom from valve-related death or valve- and/or graft-related reintervention. Time to events were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: Events occurring ≥ 31 days and up through 5 years post-implant
A linearized rate percentage is calculated by the following equation: [(Total number of late adverse events in each category/total number of late patient years) x 100]. Late adverse events are events that occur ≥ 31 days post-implant through each subject's last follow-up visit or contact. Late patient years are calculated by totaling the amount of time the valve is implanted in the patient while participating in the trial and the count begins at ≥ 31 days post-implant through all subject's last follow-up visit or contact.
Time frame: Events occurring ≥ 31 days and up through 5 years post-implant
A linearized rate percentage is calculated by the following equation: [(Total number of late adverse events in each category/total number of late patient years) x 100]. Late adverse events are events that occur ≥ 31 days post-implant through each subject's last follow-up visit or contact. Late patient years are calculated by totaling the amount of time the valve is implanted in the patient while participating in the trial and the count begins at ≥ 31 days post-implant through all subject's last follow-up visit or contact.
Time frame: Events occurring ≥ 31 days and up through 5 years post-implant
A linearized rate percentage is calculated by the following equation: [(Total number of late adverse events in each category/total number of late patient years) x 100]. Late adverse events are events that occur ≥ 31 days post-implant through each subject's last follow-up visit or contact. Late patient years are calculated by totaling the amount of time the valve is implanted in the patient while participating in the trial and the count begins at ≥ 31 days post-implant through all subject's last follow-up visit or contact.
Time frame: Events occurring ≥ 31 days and up through 5 years post-implant
A linearized rate percentage is calculated by the following equation: [(Total number of late adverse events in each category/total number of late patient years) x 100]. Late adverse events are events that occur ≥ 31 days post-implant through each subject's last follow-up visit or contact. Late patient years are calculated by totaling the amount of time the valve is implanted in the patient while participating in the trial and the count begins at ≥ 31 days post-implant through all subject's last follow-up visit or contact.
Time frame: Events occurring ≥ 31 days and up through 5 years post-implant
A linearized rate percentage is calculated by the following equation: [(Total number of late adverse events in each category/total number of late patient years) x 100]. Late adverse events are events that occur ≥ 31 days post-implant through each subject's last follow-up visit or contact. Late patient years are calculated by totaling the amount of time the valve is implanted in the patient while participating in the trial and the count begins at ≥ 31 days post-implant through all subject's last follow-up visit or contact.
Time frame: 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, 8-, 9-, and 10- Years follow-up
Participants' freedom from valve-related death or valve- and/or graft-related reintervention. Time to events were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method.
Time frame: Baseline, 1 month, 1-, 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, 6-, 7-, 8-, 9-, and 10- Years follow-up
The New York Heart Association functional classification system relates symptoms to everyday activities and the patient's quality of life.
Class I. Patients with cardiac disease but without resulting limitation of physical activity.
Class II. Patients with cardiac disease resulting in slight limitation of physical activity. They are comfortable at rest.
Class III. Patients with cardiac disease resulting in marked limitation of physical activity. They are comfortable at rest.
Class IV. Patients with cardiac disease resulting in inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort.
Symptoms of heart failure or anginal syndrome may be present even at rest.
Time frame: 1 month, 1-, 3-, and 5- Years follow-up
Mean gradient is the average flow of blood through the aortic valve measured in millimeters of mercury. Gradients are evaluated by echocardiography over time. In general, a higher value is considered worse, and a lower value is considered better but the value is dependent on the size and type of valve.
Time frame: 1 month, 1-, 3-, and 5- Years follow-up
Peak gradient is the maximum value measured of flow of blood through the aortic valve as measured in millimeters of mercury. Gradients are evaluated by echocardiography over time. In general, a higher valve is considered worse, and a lower value is considered better, but the value is dependent on the size and type of valve.
Time frame: 1 month, 1-, 3-, and 5- Years follow-up
Effective orifice area represents the cross-sectional area of the blood flow downstream of the aortic valve. Effective orifice area is evaluated by echocardiography over time. In general, a higher value is considered better, and a lower value is considered worse, but the value is dependent on the size and type of valve.
Time frame: 1 month, 1-, 3-, and 5- Years follow-up
Effective orifice area index represents the minimal cross-sectional area of the blood flow downstream of the aortic valve divided by the person's body surface area. Effective orifice area index is evaluated by echocardiography over time. In general, a higher value is considered better, and a lower value is considered worse, but the value is dependent on the size of the patient and the size and type of valve.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Edwards Lifesciences
Industry
Acronym: KONECTION
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07276711
Aortic Stenosis, Aortic Valve Disease
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07120048
Aortic Valve Disease, Cardiovascular Diseases
Heidelberg, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT06286358
Aneurysm, Aortic Aneurysm
Brussels, Belgium
View Trial DetailsNCT06352671
Aortic Valve Disease, Cardiovascular Diseases
Plano, Texas, United States
View Trial Details