Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03344510

Kinetic Anesthesia Device Study

Patients experience discomfort from lidocaine injections. Vibrating kinetic anesthesia devices (KAD) have been shown to reduce pain of injections in dentistry, pediatrics, and dermatology, though no studies of lidocaine injections in sites common to dermatologic surgery exist. We will conduct a randomized split-body study, in which healthy volunteers will rate the pain of lidocaine injections on a visual analog scale, with and without the vibrating kinetic anesthesia device being used during injection

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States

About this study

The study will be an open label split-body crossover trial, using healthy adult volunteers recruited from the faculty, staff and student body of the University of Pennsylvania, and from the University City area of Philadelphia. Participants will be randomized to one of three anatomic sites deemed relevant: the nasofacial sulcus, the lateral forehead, and the upper back. Participants will then be randomized to receive injection with the KAD first or second. The injection will be 0.5 cc of room temperature buffered lidocaine injected at constant slow speed (approximately 5 seconds) through a 30-gage needle held perpendicular to the skin by the same surgeon, with verbal cues standardized. Injections will be given in accordance with the standard of practice. When the KAD is used it will be used as directed: firmly pressed on the skin adjacent to the injection, with the needle aimed into the lighted area. Volunteers will evaluate each injection immediately after it is complete using the visual analog scale. When both injections are completed, participants will indicate their preference of injection, complete qualitative questions, and note necessary demographic information. Injection location and order of intervention (i.e. first or second) will be noted.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult volunteers greater than or equal to 18 years of age
  • Able and willing to provide informed consent
  • Able to comprehend and comply with study instructions, and able to complete necessary evaluations.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients unable or unwilling to provide informed consent.
  • Patients with lidocaine allergy
  • Patients with known pain-related or neurological condition.
  • Patients with a known cardiac condition
  • Vulnerable populations

Treatment and study plan

Kinetic Anesthesia Device

Device

A vibrating device held to the skin in close proximity to the lidocaine injection, intended to diminish discomfort by the gate control theory of pain

Control

Other

One injection will be administered without the kinetic anesthesia device.

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain of Lidocaine Injection, Measured by Visual Analog Scale.

    Time frame: This measurement will occur immediately after each injection

    Participants will be asked to mark the pain of injection on a 100mm visual analog scale. The visual analog scale is commonly used to measure acute pain, though it can be used in other settings. It consists of a line 100mm long. The left end is labeled "no pain at all" and the right end is labeled "worst pain imaginable." Participants will rate pain by marking the scale where they feel that their level of pain falls on the scale. The length from 0 to the participant's mark will be measured in millimeters (for a range of 0 to 100 mm possible). Higher numbers will be considered more pain.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient Preference for Injection With or Without Kinetic Anesthesia Device

    Time frame: This will occur immediately after the second injection

    Qualitative measure of patient preference for injections with or without the kinetic anesthesia device.

    Participants were asked whether they preferred the injection with or without the kinetic anesthesia device.

    Counts below indicate the number of participants who preferred each type of injection.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Pennsylvania

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Kinetic Anesthesia Device for Lidocaine Injection: a Randomized Split-body Study of the Effects of Kinetic Anesthesia Devices on Pain of Lidocaine Injection in Healthy Volunteers

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2018
Study completion
2018
First posted
Nov 17, 2017
Registry last updated
Apr 2, 2019

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.