Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06297447

Keeping it Simple Study (KISS)

Problem: The number of patients living with chronic musculoskeletal (MSK) pain has steadily increased over the past decade with costs rising equally. Long-standing pain is associated with significant maladaptive beliefs about pain, psychological characteristics and associated behaviors which involve structural and functional neurobiological characteristics which share common pathophysiological mechanisms as chronic pain. The investigators recent priority setting partnership investigated the research priorities from 1000 patients with chronic MSK pain, relatives, and clinicians. Better pain education was rated as one of the three most important research areas.

Solution: Pain science education has the potential to target maladaptive psychological and behavioral components that may contribute to the maintenance of chronic pain. The KISS project will evaluate the effect of a pain neuroscience education program (PNE4Adults) on rehabilitation outcomes in patients with chronic MSK pain. This intervention has the potential to change beliefs and behaviors surrounding pain in patients with chronic MSK pain. If this is successful in disrupting maladaptive cycles contributing to chronicity, this may improve outcomes for many thousand citizens.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Træningsenheden, Holbæk Municipality, Holbæk, Region Sjælland, Denmark

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Introduction: Between 20% and 33% of people across the globe live with a painful musculoskeletal (MSK) condition. Costs correspond to almost 2% of the gross domestic products of European countries, posing a challenge for health care systems across the world. Patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain have a high use of healthcare, reduced work ability, loss of productivity, and loss of quality of life. Current care guidelines underline that pain science education (PSE) is a vital part of the care delivered to people suffering from chronic pain. PSE is thought in part to attenuate central sensitization and improve self-efficacy potentially mediated through decreased pain catastrophizing and modulating nocebo-related effects. On a patient level, PSE has been shown to reduce pain catastrophizing, pain intensity, and fear-avoidance in addition to improved physical functioning, self-efficacy, and pain knowledge. Combining exercise and PSE shows greater short-term improvements in pain, disability, kinesiophobia, and pain catastrophizing compared to exercise alone and the RESTORE-trial showed the benefit of adding cognitive components. On a societal level, PSE has further shown to minimize health expenses. However, some of the proposed barriers include training of the therapist delivering the education, access to training material, time during consultation, and patients' health literacy levels. Even in Denmark, a country with a highly educated population, the prevalence of people with inadequate health literacy is high, with nearly 4 out of 10 people facing difficulties accessing, understanding, appraising, and applying health information. This underlines the need to consider novel ways of delivering PSE across all levels of health literacy.

Due to the lack of tools to facilitate PSE programs, the investigators adapted an existing pain science education program that was developed by Pas et al. (2018) (PNE4Kids) to teach children with chronic pain about the underlying biopsychosocial mechanisms contributing to pain. The adapted version, named PNE4Adults, consists of a manual for the therapist and a board game to enhance engagement and participant involvement. It provides the therapist with a clear "how-to" manual and an accessible way for patients to understand the complex concept of pain. This new PSE program may also hold promise for adult patients with low levels of health literacy and enhance learning due to its practical tools and build-in teach-back. The focus on integrating PSE into rehabilitation may enhance the therapeutic alliance needed to facilitate the patients' ability to manage their own symptoms. The investigators feasibility study in adult patients with chronic MSK pain in community-based rehabilitation (Eiger, Rathleff et al. 2024 - under review) showed that PNE4Adults was well accepted (100%) and understandable by all (100%) patients, including those with low levels of health literacy. Qualitive interviews revealed that patients (irrespective of their health literacy) acquired a deeper understanding of their own situation and their pain. This novel approach may reduce the inequality in delivering of pain education.

Purpose of Sub-project 1 The primary aim of the KISS-project is to evaluate the added effect of PSE ('PNE4Adults') to "usual care" compared to "usual care" alone in community-based rehabilitation.

The investigators hypothesis is PSE plus "usual care" will result in a larger improvement of musculoskeletal health (MSK-HQ) after 3 months (primary endpoint) compared to patients undergoing "usual care" in the municipality.

Purpose of Sub-project 2 The secondary aim is to use a process evaluation to understand how it works, and for whom the program works.

The purpose of the process evaluation is to understand how it worked and for whom, and not if it worked. The investigators will combine in-house registrations from the municipality, clinician observations, individual interviews, and focus-group interviews to answer what works for whom and under which circumstances. This will give the investigators additional insights into the novel PSE intervention, shedding light on how it induces change and uncovering any potential unintended consequences. This will support future implementation pending results.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients referred for rehabilitation in the municipalities Køge, Holbæk, and Solrød
  • With chronic (>3 months) musculoskeletal pain.
  • Adult patients (≥18 years) - no upper limit
  • Able to understand, speak, and write Danish.

Exclusion criteria

  • Known cognitive deficits (e.g., dementia).
  • Diagnosed with cancer or other serious pathologies, e.g., cauda equina.
  • Pregnancy
  • Drug addiction defined as the use of cannabis, opioids, or other drugs.
  • Neurologic or psychiatric diagnoses that hinder participation, e.g., stroke and borderline.
  • Lack of ability to cooperate.

Treatment and study plan

PNE4Adults - pain science education

Other

Is formerly described under arm descriptions

Usual Care

Other

Is formerly described under arm descriptions

Primary outcomes

  1. Musculoskeletal Health Questionnaire (MSK-HQ)

    Time frame: Primary endpoint at 3 months, additional at 6 weeks and 6 months

    Musculoskeletal (MSK) Health assessed by the Musculoskeletal Health Questionnaire. Score from 0 to 56. Higher scores reflect better MSK health, and better outcome

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mean Pain intensity

    Time frame: At 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months

    Average of two numeric rating scales (most severe pain and average pain past 24 hours). Scores from 0 to 10. Higher scores reflect more intense pain, and worse outcome.

  2. Pain interference

    Time frame: At 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months

    Pain interference subscale of Brief Pain Inventory, Score from 0 to 70, higher scores reflect more bothersome and worse outcomes.

  3. Concept of pain

    Time frame: At 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months

    Measured on the Adult Concept of Pain Inventory, Danish. Scores from 0 to 52. Higher scores reflect more alignment with contemporary pain science knowledge and better outcome.

  4. Pain catastrophizing

    Time frame: At 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months

    Measured on the Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Score from 0 to 52. Higher scores reflect worse outcomes

  5. Fear of movement

    Time frame: At 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months

    Measured on the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK-11), scores between 11 and 44. Higher scores reflect more fear of movement and worse outcomes

  6. Patient specific functional limitation

    Time frame: At 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months

    Patient-Specific Functional Scale, scores from 0 to 10. Higher scores reflect better outcomes

  7. Patient impression of change

    Time frame: At 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months

    Global Impression of Change Scale (GISC), From "very much improved" to "very much worse".

  8. Patient satisfaction with current symptom state

    Time frame: At 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months

    Measured with the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS), Yes/No answer. No is worse outcome.

  9. Pain Self-efficacy

    Time frame: At 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months

    Pain Self-efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ), scores from 0 to 60, higher scores reflect higher self-efficacy and better outcome.

  10. Adverse events

    Time frame: "through study completion, an average of 6 months".

    Any adverse events will be noted. The higher the number, the worse outcome

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Bettina Eiger, PhD-student

CONTACT

[email protected]

+4522988906

Michael S. Rathleff, dr.med., PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+4522117002

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Bettina Eiger

Other

Collaborators

  • Aalborg University
  • Central Denmark Region
  • University of Southern Denmark
  • Vrije Universiteit Brussel

Registry information

Official study title

Keeping It Simple Study (KISS) - Pain Science Education for Patients With Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain Undergoing Community-based Rehabilitation: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Acronym: KISS

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2026
First posted
Mar 7, 2024
Registry last updated
Dec 27, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.