Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07129070

Just-in-Time Training for Youth Mentors

This study will evaluate the usability, feasibility, and acceptability of a novel multi-level Just-In-Time Training (JITT) implementation strategy (JITT-EBP) that aims to equip mentors and mentor supervisors to implement evidence-based practices (EBPs) with fidelity using methods that are sustainable in rural communities. JITT-EBP integrates (a) self-directed, on-demand, online training modules for mentors and mentor supervisors, (b) synchronous evidence-based supervision strategies, and (c) an apprenticeship delivery model in which EBPs are co-led by an experienced mentor and a novice mentor, providing opportunity for in-the-moment training and support. The study will conduct a pilot hybrid type 2 effectiveness-implementation trial to evaluate the use of JITT-EBP compared to usual training for implementing mentor-delivered Interpersonal Psychotherapy-Adolescent Skills Training (IPT-AST), an evidence-based depression prevention program. 96 adolescents (age 12-17) and their parents, 8-18 mentors (depending on amount of turnover), and 4 mentor supervisors will be enrolled in the trial.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

12 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

University of Minnesota

Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455, United States

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Gracie Meyer

CONTACT

[email protected]

612-625-7240

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Youth and Parent Inclusion Criteria:

  • student at a partnering rural middle school or high school
  • age 12-17
  • have English speaking/reading/writing ability at a level to participate in IPT-AST
  • youth's parent has English or Spanish-speaking/reading/writing ability at a level to participate in research activities.

Youth and Parent Exclusion Criteria:

  • moderate or severe depression (PHQ-9 > 10)
  • active suicidal ideation with a plan and/or intent, requiring higher level of care
  • Youth does not have English-speaking ability at a level to participate in IPT-AST
  • youth's parent does not have English or Spanish-speaking/reading/writing ability at a level to participate in research activities.

Mentor and Mentor Supervisor Inclusion Criteria:

  • age 18 or older
  • have completed the typical mentor or mentor supervisor screening and selection process at partnering mentoring organization (including a background check)
  • are available to facilitate the program during after-school hours.

Treatment and study plan

Interpersonal Psychotherapy-Adolescent Skills Training via Just-In-Time Training (JITT) implementation strategy

Behavioral

IPT-AST is a group-based EBP that aims to prevent depression and support emotional well-being by helping youth develop skills to foster healthy relationships. Youth learn about the links between feelings and interpersonal interactions, and they learn communication strategies and interpersonal problem-solving skills that they can apply to their relationships.

JITT-EBP integrates (a) self-directed, on-demand, online training modules for mentors and mentor supervisors, (b) synchronous evidence-based supervision strategies, and (c) an apprenticeship delivery model in which EBPs are co-led by an experienced mentor and a novice mentor, providing opportunity for in-the-moment training and support.

Interpersonal Psychotherapy-Adolescent Skills Training (IPT-AST) implemented via usual training

Behavioral

IPT-AST is a group-based EBP that aims to prevent depression and support emotional well-being by helping youth develop skills to foster healthy relationships. Youth learn about the links between feelings and interpersonal interactions, and they learn communication strategies and interpersonal problem-solving skills that they can apply to their relationships.

Usual training involves (a) a one-day virtual training conducted by an IPT-AST expert prior to the beginning of the intervention, and (b) synchronous evidence-based supervision strategies.

Primary outcomes

  1. Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) - Week 12

    Time frame: Week 12

    Mentor and mentor supervisor report of JITT-EBP feasibility, with higher value indicating higher feasibility

  2. Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) - Week 12

    Time frame: Week 12

    youth, parent, mentor, and mentor supervisor report of IPT-AST acceptability, with higher value indicating higher acceptability.

  3. Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) - Week 12

    Time frame: Week 12

    Mentor and mentor supervisor report of JITT-EBP appropriateness, with higher value indicating higher appropriateness.

  4. Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8) - Week 12

    Time frame: Week 12

    Youth and parent report of satisfaction with IPT-AST program, with , with higher value indicating more satisfaction.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Fidelity

    Time frame: Week 12

    IPT-AST fidelity checklist

  2. Cost of implementation

    Time frame: Year 2

    Mentor Supervisor hours and hourly wages for recruitment, training, supervision, and IPT-AST delivery. IPT-AST expert hours and hourly wages for training and supervision.

  3. Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale-25 (RCADS-25) - Week 6

    Time frame: Week 6

    25-item scale that measures levels of anxiety and depressed mood. Higher scores indicate higher severity.

  4. Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale-25 (RCADS-25) - Week 12

    Time frame: Week 12

    25-item scale that measures levels of anxiety and depressed mood. Higher scores indicate higher severity.

  5. Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale-25 (RCADS-25) - Week 24

    Time frame: Week 24

    25-item scale that measures levels of anxiety and depressed mood. Higher scores indicate higher severity.

  6. Conflict Behavior Questionnaire-20 (CBQ-20) - Week 6

    Time frame: Week 6

    A higher score on the CBQ-20 indicates a greater level of conflict in parent-adolescent relationships

  7. Conflict Behavior Questionnaire-20 (CBQ-20) - Week 12

    Time frame: Week 12

    A higher score on the CBQ-20 indicates a greater level of conflict in parent-adolescent relationships

  8. Conflict Behavior Questionnaire-20 (CBQ-20) - Week 24

    Time frame: Week 24

    A higher score on the CBQ-20 indicates a greater level of conflict in parent-adolescent relationships

  9. National Survey of Children's Health Social Competence Scale (NSCH-SCS) - Week 6

    Time frame: Week 6

    A higher score on the NSCH-SCS indicates a higher level of youth social skills, as reported by a parent.

  10. National Survey of Children's Health Social Competence Scale (NSCH-SCS) - Week 12

    Time frame: Week 12

    A higher score on the NSCH-SCS indicates a higher level of youth social skills, as reported by a parent.

  11. National Survey of Children's Health Social Competence Scale (NSCH-SCS) - Week 24

    Time frame: Week 24

    A higher score on the NSCH-SCS indicates a higher level of youth social skills, as reported by a parent.

  12. NIH Toolbox -Loneliness Ages 8-17 - Week 6

    Time frame: Week 6

    A higher score indicates greater severity of loneliness

  13. NIH Toolbox -Loneliness Ages 8-17 - Week 12

    Time frame: Week 12

    A higher score indicates greater severity of loneliness

  14. NIH Toolbox -Loneliness Ages 8-17 - Week 24

    Time frame: Week 24

    A higher score indicates greater severity of loneliness

  15. PROMIS Pediatric Item Bank - Peer Relationships - Week 6

    Time frame: Week 6

    A higher score indicates a more positive experience in relationships with peers

  16. PROMIS Pediatric Item Bank - Peer Relationships - Week 12

    Time frame: Week 12

    A higher score indicates a more positive experience in relationships with peers

  17. PROMIS Pediatric Item Bank - Peer Relationships - Week 24

    Time frame: Week 24

    A higher score indicates a more positive experience in relationships with peers

  18. NIH Toolbox - General Life Satisfaction - Week 6

    Time frame: Week 6

    A higher score indicates more life satisfaction

  19. NIH Toolbox - General Life Satisfaction - Week 12

    Time frame: Week 12

    A higher score indicates more life satisfaction

  20. NIH Toolbox - General Life Satisfaction - Week 24

    Time frame: Week 24

    A higher score indicates more life satisfaction

  21. PROMIS Pediatric Short Form v1.0 - Positive Affect - Week 6

    Time frame: Week 6

    A higher score indicates more positive affect

  22. PROMIS Pediatric Short Form v1.0 - Positive Affect - Week 12

    Time frame: Week 12

    A higher score indicates more positive affect

  23. PROMIS Pediatric Short Form v1.0 - Positive Affect - Week 24

    Time frame: Week 24

    A higher score indicates more positive affect

  24. Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) - Week 6

    Time frame: Week 6

    A higher score indicates higher self-esteem

  25. Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) - Week 12

    Time frame: Week 12

    A higher score indicates higher self-esteem

  26. Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) - Week 24

    Time frame: Week 24

    A higher score indicates higher self-esteem

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Gracie Meyer

CONTACT

[email protected]

612-625-7240

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Minnesota

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Just-in-Time Training for Youth Mentors: A Strategy for Implementing Evidence-Based Preventive Interventions for Youth in Rural Communities

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2028
Study completion
2028
First posted
Aug 19, 2025
Registry last updated
Apr 24, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.