Pierre Fabre Research Institute
Boulogne, France
NCT Number: NCT01599013
This study is assessing the combination of well known cytotoxics with a novel anti-cancer agent that could be administered as monotherapy without renal toxicity in patients with renal impairment presenting with advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma previously treated with a platinum-based regimen. The intent of this study is to clarify the benefit/risk ratio of the two most promising associations of cytotoxics including the novel therapeutic agent, vinflunine: vinflunine-gemcitabine and vinflunine-carboplatin.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–79 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Boulogne, France
Gemcitabine and carboplatin have been the most studied and used anticancer agents in cisplatin-unfit patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma. Both agents previously demonstrated clinical activity as single agent and/or as part of combination regimen in patients with advanced or metastatic disease even if clinical benefits and survival remains limited in this setting for this population.
The purpose of this study is to test in a randomized trial enrolling patients with renal impairment or moderate congestive heart failure two combinations of a novel cytotoxic agent, vinflunine, one with gemcitabine and another with carboplatin in order to determine the most promising combination in the first line treatment of advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Other names: JAVLOR, GEMZAR
Other names: JAVLOR, CBDCA
Time frame: Change from baseline in tumor assessment at 12 weeks (cycle 4)
Assessment of lesions (measurable and non-measurable) should be performed at baseline and every 6 weeks (assessment interval).
Evaluable patients: all baseline lesions must have been assessed at least once after the second cycle (6 weeks); patients who progress before the first evaluation will be considered as early progression.
Primary analysis is planned on the intent to treat population, secondary analysis being performed on the evaluable population.
Time frame: Change from baseline in tumor assessment at 12 weeks (cycle 4)
Assessment of lesions (measurable and non-measurable) should be performed at baseline and every 6 weeks (assessment interval).
Evaluable patients: all baseline lesions must have been assessed at least once after the second cycle (6 weeks); patients who progress before the first evaluation will be considered as early progression.
Time frame: From the date of randomisation until the date of documented progression or date of death due to any cause, assessed up to 10 months
Tumor assessment at baseline and then every 6 weeks, until tumor progression. Duration of disease control according to investigator will be calculated among the responders and stable patients from the date of randomisation until the documentation of progression or death due to any cause. Patients who are lost to follow-up without progression, or reach the time point of analysis without a known record of progression or death will have the duration of disease control censored at the date of last tumour assessment or last contact of a follow-up showing no progression, whichever occur last.
Time frame: From the date that measurement criteria are first met for complete or partial response until the date of documented progression or date of death due to any cause, assessed up to 10 months
Tumor assessment at baseline and then every 6 weeks, until tumor progression. Duration of response will be calculated among the responders (i.e. CR and PR) . Patients who are lost to follow-up, or reach the time point of analysis without a known record of progression or death will have the duration of response censored at the date of last tumour assessment or last contact of a follow-up showing no progression, whichever occur last.
Time frame: From the date of randomisation up to the first report of documented response, assessed up to 12 weeks (cycle 4).
Tumor assessment at baseline and then every 6 weeks. Will be calculated among the responders (i.e. CR and PR)
Time frame: From the date of randomisation until tumor progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of patient consent, lost to follow-up or start of new anticancer therapy, assessed up to 10 months.
Tumor assessment (RECIST) every 6 weeks. Patients who reach the time point of analysis without failure as defined above will have the time to treatment failure censored at the date of last tumour assessment or last contact of a follow-up not showing progression. Patients who discontinued treatment for other reason and who are lost to follow-up will be censored at the date of last contact.
Time frame: From the date of randomisation until the date of progression or the date of death from any cause if no progression was recorded before, median patient follow-up of 11 months
Tumor assessment every 6 weeks (RECIST).Patients who are lost to follow-up, or reach the time point of analysis without a known record of progression or death will have the progression-free survival censored at the date of last tumour assessment or last contact of a follow-up showing no progression, whichever occur last.
Time frame: From the time of randomisation up to death or last follow-up, assessed with a median patient follow-up of 15 months (assessed up to 24 months)
Data recording every 3 months. For patients who have not died, survival time will be censored at the date of last news (i.e: date of last administration, tumor assessment, clinical examination, haematological or biochemistrical assessment or date of last contact).
Time frame: AE and SAE will be collected up to 30 days after the last treatment administration, on an expected average period of 17 weeks
Population: all treated patients unless the patient is lost to follow-up immediately after the start of the treatment. The patients will be analysed in the treatment arm they actually received.
The NCI-CTC classification version 2.0 will be used to classify toxicities. Maximum grade or severity will be reported by cycle and by patient for each MedDRA Preferred Term. Analyses will be performed both regardless the relationship to treatment and related to treatment.
Biochemical toxicities: the worst CTCAE version 2.0 grade will be analysed according to the grade present at baseline.
Pierre Fabre Medicament
Industry
Randomized Phase II Study Assessing the Combination of Vinflunine With Gemcitabine and Vinflunine With Carboplatin in Patients Ineligible to Cisplatin With Advanced or Metastatic Transitional Cell Carcinoma of the Urothelium
Acronym: JASINT1
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03636256
Bladder Cancer, Cancer of the Bladder
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07566156
Carcinoma, Carcinoma, Transitional Cell
Santa Barbara, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05544552
Advanced Solid Tumor, Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03081858
Bladder Cancer, Bladder Cancer Cell Transitional
Tucson, Arizona, United States
View Trial Details