Dexamethasone
DrugGiven PO
Other names: Decadron, DexPak, Dexasone, Baycadron, Zema, Diodex, Hexadrol, Maxidex
NCT Number: NCT02765854
This randomized phase II trial studies how well ixazomib and dexamethasone or ixazomib, dexamethasone, and lenalidomide work based on the presence of the rearrangement of a gene called nuclear factor of kappa light polypeptide gene enhancer in B-cells 2 (NFKB2) in treating patients with multiple myeloma that has returned after a period of improvement or does not respond to treatment. Ixazomib may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking enzymes called proteasomes needed for cell growth. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as dexamethasone, work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Lenalidomide may stimulate the immune system against cancer cells and may also prevent the growth of new blood vessels that tumors need to grow. It is not yet known whether ixazomib and dexamethasone, or ixazomib, dexamethasone, and lenalidomide are more effective in treating multiple myeloma.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Emory University/Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, Georgia, United States
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
To test whether the NFKB2 rearrangement can guide the selection of treatment (ixazomib [ixazomib citrate] plus dexamethasone [Id] or ixazomib plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone [IRd]) by conducting the following comparisons:
I. To compare the response rate at 4 cycles between patients treated with Id and patients treated with IRd and confirm the lack of significant difference in overall response.
II. To compare the response rate at 4 cycles between non-rearranged and rearranged NFKB2 treated with Id and confirm that NFKB2 rearrangement is associated with reduce response rate.
III. To compare the responses rate at 4 cycles of patients with rearranged NFKB2 treated with Id or IRd and confirm that adding lenalidomide increases the response rate in this population.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To determine time to treatment failure (TTF).
II. To determine the frequency and severity of adverse events (AE) in IRd treated cohort.
III. To identify novel transcribed mutations associated with Id and IRd resistance in patients with multiple myeloma (MM).
IV. To determine the prevalence of NFKB2 rearrangement in relapsed/refractory MM patients screened in the study.
V. To determine the prevalence of NFKB2 rearrangement according to the type of previous therapies received in all patients screened in the study.
VI. To determine the toxicity profile of the study drugs according to the presence of NFKB2 rearrangement.
VII. Delineate transcribed mutations associated with relapse or refractoriness to Id or IRd treatment by ribonucleic acid (RNA)-sequencing.
OUTLINE:
ARM A (UNMUTATED NFKB2 REARRANGEMENT): Patients receive ixazomib orally (PO) on days 1, 8, and 15 and dexamethasone PO on days 1, 8, 15, and 22.
Patients with mutated NFKB2 rearrangement are randomized in to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
ARM B (MUTATED NFKB2 REARRANGEMENT): Patients receive ixazomib and dexamethasone as in arm A.
ARM C (MUTATED NFKB2 REARRANGEMENT): Patients receive ixazomib and dexamethasone as in arm A and lenalidomide PO daily on days 1-21.
In all arms, cycles repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Patients may proceed to autologous stem cell transplant after 4 cycles of treatment.
After completion of study, patients are followed up monthly.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Given PO
Other names: Decadron, DexPak, Dexasone, Baycadron, Zema, Diodex, Hexadrol, Maxidex
Given PO
Other names: MLN9708, Ninlaro, Ixazomib citrate
Given PO
Other names: CC-5013, Revlimid
Time frame: 112 days
Comparison to a historical control: The overall response rate (ORR) of each arm at 4 cycles (112 days) is compared to the historical RR of 30%. Arm A or Arm C is designed to detect an improved RR of 60% vs. 30% using Simon's 2-stage Optimum design with a power of at least 90% and an alpha error of 5%., respectively. For Arm B will achieve a power of at least 80% at the significance level of 0.05 to claim that Arm B has equivalent RR as the historical RR of 30% assuming an equivalence tolerance of +/- 20% when the true RR of Arm B is approximately 30%.
Response Rate is defined by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR.
Time frame: Up to 30 months
Kaplan-Meier curves will be used for the time to treatment failure according to the Arm of treatment utilized. Kaplan-Meyer curve analysis was performed to evaluate the time to treatment failure comparison.
Time frame: At baseline and month 12
To determine the prevalence of NFKB2 rearrangement according to the type of previous therapies received in all patients screened in the study.
Time frame: At baseline and at 12 months
Determine percentage of patients with response at 8 cycles of treatment
Time frame: 30 days post-treatment, up to a total of 1 year
Toxicity information recorded will include the type, severity, and the probable association with the study regimen. Tables will be constructed to summarize the observed incidence by severity and type of toxicity. Additional safety analyses may be performed to most clearly enumerate rates of toxicities and to further define the safety profile of Id or IRd combinations. Treatment-emergent events will be tabulated.
Emory University
Other
Phase II Trial of Ixazomib and Dexamethasone Versus Ixazomib, Dexamethasone and Lenalidomide, Randomized With NFKB2 Rearrangement. (Proteasome Inhibitor NFKB2 Rearrangement Driven Trial, PINR)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04205409
Blood Protein Disorders, Cardiovascular Diseases
Seattle, Washington, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01415882
Blood Protein Disorders, Cardiovascular Diseases
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04640779
Blood Protein Disorders, Cardiovascular Diseases
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01163357
Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipient, Blood Protein Disorders
Duarte, California, United States
View Trial Details