Human Performance and Clinical Outcomes Lab, The University of Iowa
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242, United States
NCT Number: NCT04978363
The proposed study evaluates the effects of a hands free crutch (iWalkFree, Inc.) on walking balance and stability compared to standard crutches. It is expected that the hands free crutch will provide better stability during walking on a level surface and better reported balance confidence compared to standard crutches. In this study, walking stability will be assessed using motion capture data from an infrared camera system with 12 mounted cameras surrounding a level walkway. Balance will be assessed through a self-reported activity-specific balance confidence (ABC) questionnaire. An improved understanding of the effects of the hands free crutch on gait may benefit the future prescription of ambulatory assistive devices. The proposed study may provide insight that can be used by physical therapists and other providers to select the ambulatory assistive device that best meets their patients' needs.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–45 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242, United States
The purpose of this study is to compare the hands free crutch (HFC) to standard axillary crutches (SACs) with and without a walking boot, using outcomes related to walking stability, balance confidence, patient preference, device comfort, and any reported pain while using the devices.
Healthy, able-bodied individuals will wear a walking boot to simulate a below knee injury or post-surgery condition during participation. They will maintain a non-weight bearing status while completing the 4 research conditions in randomized order: 1) BOOT, 2) HFC + BOOT, 3) SAC + BOOT, or 4) NONE.
Participants will complete 5 total sessions, with 4 biomechanics data collection sessions corresponding to the 4 conditions. At the first visit, participants will complete pre-consent screening and consent paperwork. Then they will be randomized to the 4 conditions above, and anthropometric (body height, weight/mass, leg length, shoe length and width) and demographic data will be collected. Participants will accommodate overnight to each of the 4 study conditions before testing. If participants are randomized to the NONE condition first, they will have the option of completing testing in that condition (no Boot) at the initial visit. The primary dependent measure is whole body angular momentum, an objective measure of walking stability.
Data will be collected using over 50 small reflective markers placed on the participants and the assistive devices, a computerized motion capture system and force plates embedded in the floor. The force plates capture ground reaction forces which will be used to calculate joint moments for interpretation of angular momentum data. The motion capture system will be used to evaluate joint and segment kinematics and temporal-spatial data to characterize the gait pattern in each condition and calculate angular momentum.
The second purpose of this research study is to determine the effect of crutch use on participant reported balance confidence and device preference. A validated balance confidence questionnaire and participant satisfaction, comfort and preference will be used to compare between conditions. A numerical pain rating scale (0-10) will be used to assess for any reported pain in all of the conditions.
The third purpose of this research is to determine the effect of crutch (HFC and SACs) and boot (with and without) use on walking stability as measured by whole body and segmental angular momentum during gait. Two additional conditions are added to address this purpose (HFC NO BOOT and SAC NO BOOT), resulting in a total of 6 research conditions:
Ultimately, this study could assist physical therapists and other providers in the clinical prescription and application of such devices.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
A walking boot is a common type of brace/boot that restricts ankle and foot movement.
Other names: Walking Boot, CAM Boot, Controlled Ankle Motion Boot
The Hands Free Crutch (HFC) by iWalkFree, Inc. is a novel, ambulatory assistive device that prevents foot and ankle loading while also allowing free use of the arms and hands.
Other names: Hands Free Crutch, iWalk Free, iWalk 3.0
Standard axillary crutches (SAC) are ambulatory assistive devices, commonly used for lower extremity injuries or surgeries.
Other names: Standard Axillary Crutches, axillary crutches, crutches, underarm crutches
The Hands Free Crutch (HFC) by iWalkFree, Inc. is a novel, ambulatory assistive device that prevents foot and ankle loading while also allowing free use of the arms and hands. A walking boot is a common type of brace/boot that restricts ankle and foot movement.
Standard axillary crutches (SAC) are ambulatory assistive devices, commonly used for lower extremity injuries or surgeries. A walking boot is a common type of brace/boot that restricts ankle and foot movement.
Time frame: one session (up to 2 hours long), out of 4 total sessions
Range of whole-body angular momentum in the sagittal plane during gait using the motion capture system. While angular momentum can be measured in kg*m^2/second it is reported as dimensionless in this study as it has been normalized to body weight (kg), height (m), and walking speed (m/s).
Time frame: Baseline
Balance confidence will be assessed using the ABC Scale on 16 activities, using a 0-100% scale (0% = no confidence and 100% = completely confident).
Time frame: over three sessions (an average of 2 hours for each session)
Pain will be assessed using a standard 11-point numerical pain rating scale, in which 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain imaginable.
Time frame: Baseline
A modified device comfort scale using an 11-point rating overall score (0=Most Uncomfortable; 10=Most Comfortable).
Time frame: over four sessions (an average of 2 hours for each session)
A modified device comfort scale using an 11-point rating scale (0=worst assistive device;10=best assistive device).
Time frame: one session (up to 2 hours long), out of 4 total sessions
The participant will rank in order (1-4) their preference of assistive device: NONE, BOOT, HFC and SAC.
University of Iowa
Other
Effects of a Hands Free Crutch on Walking Stability During Gait
Acronym: HFC
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06068257
Breast Cancer, Breast Diseases
Orlando, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06702423
Healthy
London, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT07223164
Healthy
Irvine, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05595902
Healthy
Kadıköy, Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details