Triatec 10 mg
DrugUse and dosage according to physician judgement, concomitant treatment assumed and randomization arm (Intensive Strategy vs. Usual Strategy).
NCT Number: NCT00421863
Multicenter, prospective, randomised, open study comparing the effect of the following two strategies in hypertensive subjects > 55 years and poorly controlled (systolic blood pressure >= 150 mmHg) by antihypertensive treatment:
* usual strategy: reduction of systolic blood pressure to below 140 mmHg, independently of diastolic blood pressure levels; * intensive strategy: reduction of systolic blood pressure to below 130 mmHg, independently of diastolic blood pressure levels.
During the initial run in period two qualifying visits at distance of 7-14 days will be carried out to establish whether blood pressure remains uncontrolled (systolic blood pressure >=150 mmHg)by current drug treatment. At the end of the second visit eligible patients will be admitted to the study and the following examinations will be carried out: clinical visit, routine laboratory tests, 12-lead ECG. At this point eligible patients will be randomised to one of the two blood pressure goals outlined above.
Subsequent clinical visits will be carried out at 4 month-intervals up to the end of the study (4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 months).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me55 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
Ospedale Civile Mellini, Chiari, BS, Italy
Study partially sponsored by: Boehringer Ingelheim, Sanofi-Aventis, Pfizer
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Use and dosage according to physician judgement, concomitant treatment assumed and randomization arm (Intensive Strategy vs. Usual Strategy).
Use and dosage according to physician judgement, concomitant treatment assumed and randomization arm (Intensive Strategy vs. Usual Strategy).
Use and dosage according to physician judgement, concomitant treatment assumed and randomization arm (Intensive Strategy vs. Usual Strategy).
Use and dosage according to physician judgement, concomitant treatment assumed and randomization arm (Intensive Strategy vs. Usual Strategy).
Use and dosage according to physician judgement, concomitant treatment assumed and randomization arm (Intensive Strategy vs. Usual Strategy).
Use and dosage according to physician judgement, concomitant treatment assumed and randomization arm (Intensive Strategy vs. Usual Strategy).
Use and dosage according to physician judgement, concomitant treatment assumed and randomization arm (Intensive Strategy vs. Usual Strategy).
Use and dosage according to physician judgement, concomitant treatment assumed and randomization arm (Intensive Strategy vs. Usual Strategy).
Use and dosage according to physician judgement, concomitant treatment assumed and randomization arm (Intensive Strategy vs. Usual Strategy).
Time frame: 0, 12, 24 months
Heart Care Foundation
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05610059
Aging, Behavior
Tucson, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02439775
Cardiovascular Diseases, Hypertension
Huntsville, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07735468
Behavior, Cardiovascular Diseases
Osuna, Sevilla, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT00837122
Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes
Accra, Ghana
View Trial Details