Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06212336

ISTH/ANRS 0409s INTEGRATE Lassa Fever Study

Lassa fever (LF) is a viral haemorrhagic fever responsible of 5000 deaths per year in West Africa, with in-hospital mortality at 12%. Transmission to humans occurs mainly via direct or indirect exposure to excreta from the rodent reservoir, mainly made up of Mastomys natalensis . Less frequently, LASV may also be transmitted from human to human and cause nosocomial outbreaks. Ribavirin is the only treatment available with worrying toxicity, questionable efficacy and low access because of its high cost. Consequently, there is an urgent need for new drugs to treat LF patients. The Research and Development (R&D) Blueprint of the World Health Organization (WHO) has included LF in the list of priority diseases for urgent research and development.

The INTEGRATE consortium is an unprecedented international collaboration on Lassa fever of 15 partners from 10 countries across West Africa, Europe and North America and across several disciplines (epidemiological researchers, social scientists, medical health facility professionals, humanitarian actors, etc.).

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2 / Phase 3

Primary location

Phebe Hospital, Suacoco, Bong County, Liberia

Loading trial locations.

About this study

The INTEGRATE study is a platform, multinational, multicentre, sequential, seamless phase II-III, controlled, randomised, superiority trial in open-label parallel arms. Three arms will be assessed and compared to the SCD. Its primary objective is to compare the efficacy of each Investigational Medical Product (IMP) to Standard of Care Drug (SCD) to prevent death or organ failure in hospitalized patients with confirmed LF. Secondary objectives will be i) to compare the safety and tolerability of each IMP and SCD, ii) to compare the efficacy of each IMP and SCD on clinical, virological and biological parameters, iii) to describe the pharmacokinetics of each IMP and iv) to develop a pharmacokinetics / pharmacodynamics model for each IMP informing about optimal dosing regimens and dose-response relationship.

  • Objectives

1.1 Primary objective The primary objective of the trial is to compare the efficacy of each IMP and SCD to prevent death or organ failure in hospitalized participants with confirmed LF.

1.2. Secondary objectives

  • To compare the safety and tolerability of each IMP and SCD
  • To compare the efficacy of each IMP and SCD on clinical, virological and biological parameters
  • To describe the pharmacokinetics of each IMP
  • To develop a pharmacokinetics / pharmacodynamics model for each IMP informing about optimal dosing regimens and dose-response relationship
  • Design
  • Phase II: comparative controlled design
  • Phase III: Whitehead's sequential double triangular design
  • Sample size:

In the current version of the protocol (if all sub-protocols start at once):

  • 3 IMPs go into phase III: N= 732
  • 2 IMPs go into phase III: N= 585
  • 1 IMP go into phase III: N= 438
  • Duration
  • Hospitalization: 10 days
  • Follow-up: 28 days

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

  • General

Inclusion criteria

  • Clinical disease with signs and symptoms suggestive for LF
  • Positive plasma LASV RT-PCR
  • Participant requires hospitalization per the local guidelines
  • Participant or their legally authorized representative is able and willing to sign the informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Unwilling to provide informed consent
  • Positive pregnancy test
  • Unwilling to provide informed consent
  • History of allergic reaction or other contra-indication to ribavirin according to the Reference safety document
  • Received drug therapy for Lassa fever (excluding supportive care) prior to inclusion
  • Has received a vaccine against LF
  • Sub-protocols

2.1 Favipiravir high dose sub-protocol

Inclusion criteria

• Age ≥ 18 years old

Exclusion criteria

• Pregnancy (evidenced by positive urine pregnancy test in women of child-bearing potential)

  • Treatment contraindicated with favipiravir according to the Reference safety document
  • Pre-existing liver failure
  • Severe symptomatic gout/hyperuricemia
  • History of QT prolongation or arrhythmia or other cardiac disorders
  • PR interval ≥ 200 ms
  • Hypersensitivity to excipients
  • Inability to take oral drug (e.g. encephalopathy, severe vomiting)

2.2. Favipiravir-Ribavirin sub-protocol

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years old

Exclusion criteria

  • Pregnancy (evidenced by positive urine pregnancy test in women of child-bearing potential)
  • Treatment contraindicated with favipiravir according to the Reference safety document
  • Pre-existing liver failure
  • Severe symptomatic gout/hyperuricemia
  • History of QT prolongation or arrhythmia or other cardiac disorders
  • PR interval ≥ 200 ms
  • Hypersensitivity to excipients
  • Inability to take oral drug (e.g. encephalopathy, severe vomiting)

2.3. Dexamethasone sub-protocol

Inclusion criteria

• Age ≥ 12 years old

Exclusion criteria

  • Pregnancy (evidenced by positive urine pregnancy test in women of child-bearing potential)
  • Known intolerance and contra-indications to ribavirin or dexamethasone
  • Patients who already received a corticosteroid within the preceding 7 days

2.4 ARN-75039 subprotocols

Exclusion criteria

• History of severe gastrointestinal disease

  • History of chronic generalized pruritus
  • History of severe chronic liver disease
  • History of severe cardiac disorder

Treatment and study plan

Favipiravir

Drug

Interventional Medicinal Product (IMP)

Ribavirin

Drug

Control arm

Other names: Standard of care

Dexamethasone

Drug

Interventional Medicinal Product (IMP)

ARN-75039 high dose

Drug

Investigational Medicinal Product

ARN-75039 low dose

Drug

Investigational Medicinal Product

Primary outcomes

  1. Death

    Time frame: Day 28

    Proportion of participants death definition by Y/N measure

    Clinical aggravation is defined as the first occurrence of one of the following conditions, at any time point between baseline and Day 14 (included):

    Death, or

    Increase (+1 or +2) in the number (0, 1 or 2) of organ failures among:

    Renal failure: KDIGO stage 3 Respiratory failure: SpO2/FiO2* ≤ 315 Cardiovascular failure: MBP** < 65 mmHg or SBP < 90 mmHg (measured twice with a time interval of 10 min) and lactate > 2 mmol/L Analysis per component Proportion of participants with a newly occurring component of the composite primary endpoint between Day 0 and Day 14.

    Sensitivity analyses Proportion of participants presenting no clinical aggravation between baseline and Day 14, with varying thresholds on the definitions of organ failures or adding different organ failures definition (e.g. neurologic, hepatic, hematologic, etc.).

  2. New onset of acute kidney failure

    Time frame: Between Day 0 and Day 10

    Proportion of participants a new onset of acute kidney failure . Definition by KDIGO 3 measure. 3.0 times baseline, OR increase in serum creatinine to ≥4.0 mg/dl (≥353.6 mmol/l).

    The composite endpoint assesses the new onset of an event from D0

  3. New onset of acute respiratory failure

    Time frame: Between Day 0 and Day 10

    Proportion of participants a new onset of acute respiratory failure. Definition by SpO2/FiO2 ≤ 315 measure The composite endpoint assesses the new onset of an event from D0

  4. New onset of shock

    Time frame: Between Day 0 and Day 10

    Proportion of participants a New onset of shock. Mean Blood Pressure (MBP) < 65 mmHg or Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) < 90 mmHg (measured twice with a time interval of 10 min) and lactate > 2 mmol/L measured at the same time The composite endpoint assesses the new onset of an event from D0

Secondary outcomes

  1. Safety of each IMP and SCD

    Time frame: Between Day 0 and Day 10

    Proportion (events and participants with at least one event) of:

    • Adverse Event* grade 3 and higher
    • Serious Adverse Event
    • Adverse Event of Special Interest
  2. Safety of each IMP and SCD

    Time frame: Day 0, Day 28

    Proportion (events and participants with at least one event) of:

    Adverse Event* grade 3 and higher

    • Serious Adverse Event
    • Adverse Event of Special Interest
  3. Organ failure from composite primary endpoint

    Time frame: Between Day 0 and Day 10

    Proportion of participants with a newly occurring component of the composite primary endpoint

  4. New onset of Acute Kidney Injury

    Time frame: Between Day 0 and discharge

    Proportion of participants meeting KDIGO ≥ 2 or initiation of renal replacement therapy parameters

  5. New onset of CVPU or seizure

    Time frame: Between Day 0 and Discharge

    Proportion of participants with CVPU or seizure

  6. New onset of Bleeding

    Time frame: Between Day 0 and Discharge

    Proportion of participants meeting WHO bleeding scale grade 2 or above

  7. New onset of Severe anaemia

    Time frame: Between Day 0 and Discharge

    Proportion of participants with Hb level < 8 g/dL

  8. New onset of liver failure

    Time frame: Between Day 0 and Discharge

    Proportion of participants with AST or ALT ≥ 3 ULN

  9. New onset of clinical severity score

    Time frame: Between Day 0 and Discharge

    Proportion of participants with a NEWS2 score ≥7

  10. Intensive care strategies - oxygen therapy

    Time frame: Between Day 0 and Discharge

    Proportion of participants having received oxygen therapy

  11. Intensive care strategies - RRT

    Time frame: Between Day 0 and Discharge

    Proportion of participants having received RRT

  12. Intensive care strategies - blood transfusion

    Time frame: Between Day 0 and Discharge

    Proportion of participants having received blood transfusion

  13. Intensive care strategies- inotropes or vasopressors

    Time frame: Between Day 0 and Discharge

    Proportion of participants having received inotropes or vasopressors

  14. the viral clearance - Change in LF RT-PCR Ct

    Time frame: Day 3, Day 5, Day 7, Day 9

    value (for each target gene) from D0

  15. the viral clearance - Change in LASV viral

    Time frame: D01-D10

    titer from D0

  16. viral clearance - LASV RT-PCR

    Time frame: D01- D10

    <LLQ

  17. Pharmacokinetics (phase II only)

    Time frame: Between Day 0 and Day 10

    • Peak concentration (Cmax)
  18. Pharmacokinetics (phase II only)

    Time frame: Between Day 0 and Day 10

    • Time to peak concentration (Tmax)
  19. Pharmacokinetics (phase II only)

    Time frame: Between Day 0 and Day 10

    • Area under the curve
  20. Pharmacokinetics (phase II only)

    Time frame: Between Day 0 and Day 10

    • Half-life
  21. Pharmacokinetics (phase II only)

    Time frame: Between Day 0 and Day 10

    • Clearance
  22. Pharmacokinetics (phase II only)

    Time frame: Between Day 0 and Day 10

    • Volume(s) of distribution
  23. PK/PD (phase II only)

    Time frame: Between Day 0 and Day 10

    • Prediction of initial viral load and slope of decline
  24. PK/PD (phase II only)

    Time frame: Between Day 0 and Day 10

    • Optimal dosing regimen with PK/PD modelling
  25. LASV RT-PCR

    Time frame: D28 if participants have a positive RT PCR at discharge

    LASV RT-PCR (Ct value)

  26. Peak CRP (Phase II stage only)

    Time frame: D01-D10

    Peak CRP level (mg/L)

  27. Time to first LASV RT-PCR <LLOQ

    Time frame: D01-D10

    Time to first LASV RT-PCR <LLOQ (days)

Other outcomes

  1. Viral resistance parameters

    Time frame: Between Day 0 and Day 10

    Frequency of LASV resistance mutations

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Camille FRITZELL, PHD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+33 6 58 80 90 12

Sylvain JUCHET

CONTACT

[email protected]

+33 6 58 80 90 12

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Irrua Specialist Teaching Hospital

Other

Collaborators

  • ANRS, Emerging Infectious Diseases
  • Alex Ekwueme Federal University Teaching Hospital
  • Alliance for International Medical Action
  • Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine
  • Centre de Recherche Médicale de Lambaréné
  • Donka Hospital, Conakry
  • Federal Medical Centre, Owo
  • Fondation pour la Recherche Scientifique, Benin
  • Médecins Sans Frontières, Belgium
  • Phebe Hospital, Liberia
  • Programme PAC-CI, Site ANRS-MIE de Côte d'Ivoire
  • University of Bordeaux
  • University of Hamburg-Eppendorf
  • University of North Carolina

Registry information

Official study title

Efficacy, Tolerability and Safety of New or Repurposed Drugs Against Lassa Fever in West African Countries

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2027
First posted
Jan 18, 2024
Registry last updated
Feb 4, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.