aldesleukin
BiologicalGiven IV
Other names: 125-L-Serine-2-133-interleukin 2, Proleukin, r-serHuIL-2, Recombinant Human IL-2, Recombinant Human Interleukin-2
NCT Number: NCT00026312
This partially randomized phase III trial studies isotretinoin with dinutuximab, aldesleukin, and sargramostim to see how well it works compared to isotretinoin alone following stem cell transplant in treating patients with neuroblastoma. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as isotretinoin, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Monoclonal antibodies, such as dinutuximab, may block tumor growth in different ways by targeting certain cells. Aldesleukin and sargramostim may stimulate a person's white blood cells to kill cancer cells. It is not yet known if chemotherapy is more effective with or without dinutuximab, aldesleukin, and sargramostim following stem cell transplant in treating neuroblastoma.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeUp to 30 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
John Hunter Children's Hospital, Hunter Regional Mail Centre, New South Wales, Australia
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
I. Determine if monoclonal antibody Ch14.18 (dinutuximab) + cytokines + isotretinoin (13-cis-retinoic acid, or RA) improves event free survival after myeloablative therapy and stem cell rescue as compared to RA alone, in high risk neuroblastoma patients who have achieved a pre-autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) response of complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR), or partial response (PR).
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. Determine if monoclonal antibody Ch14.18 + cytokines + isotretinoin (13-cis-retinoic acid, or RA) improves overall survival after myeloablative therapy and stem cell rescue as compared to RA alone, in high risk neuroblastoma patients who have achieved a pre-ASCT response of CR, VGPR, or PR.
II. Determine if immunotherapy + RA improves event free survival and overall survival as compared to RA alone, in the subgroup of high risk International Neuroblastoma Staging System (INSS) stage 4 neuroblastoma patients who have achieved a pre-ASCT response of CR, VGPR, or PR.
III. Determine the toxicities of the combination of monoclonal antibody Ch14.18 with cytokines.
IV. To compare the outcome data of the patients with persistent disease documented by biopsy (Stratum 07) to the historical data for the analogous patients from Children's Cancer Group (CCG)-3981.
V. To further describe and refine the event free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) estimates and baseline characteristics for subjects receiving Ch14.18 + cytokines + RA, following cessation of the randomized portion of the study.
VI. To further describe the safety and toxicity of Ch14.18 + cytokines + RA under the new administration guidelines implemented following cessation of the randomized portion of the study with focus on: a) number of courses delivered per subject; b) number of dose reductions or stoppage (ch14.18 and/or interleukin [IL]-2); and c) number of toxic deaths.
TERTIARY OBJECTIVES:
I. In the subgroup of neuroblastoma patients who have achieved a pre-ASCT response of CR, VGPR, or PR, determine if there is a difference between the two randomized regimens in reducing the minimal residual disease (MRD) burden as detected by the following parameters: meta-iodobenylguanidine (MIBG) scan, immunocytology (IC) of blood and bone marrow samples, reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for tyrosine hydroxylase, phosphoglycolate phosphatase (PGP) 9.5, and melanoma antigen family A, 1 (MAGE-1) in blood and bone marrow.
II. Determine if change from baseline of MRD is associated with event free and overall survival.
III. Determine whether tumor biology at diagnosis correlates with event-free and overall survival, for either of the randomized regimens.
IV. To explore the relationship between antibody-dependent cellular cytoxicity (ADCC) and EFS.
V. To determine a descriptive profile of human anti-chimeric antibody (HACA) during immunotherapy.
VI. To determine the variability of 13-cis-retinoic-acid pharmacokinetics and relationship to pharmacogenomic parameters and determine if these levels and/or genetic variations correlate with EFS or systemic toxicity.
VII. To determine the potential effect of ch14.18 on cardiac repolarization and to evaluate ch14.18 plasma levels.
VIII. To determine if the presence of naturally occurring anti-glycan antibodies correlates with allergic reactions and blood levels of ch14.18.
IX. To determine if the genotype of Fc receptor (FcR) and killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptor (Kir)/Kir-ligand correlate with EFS.
X. To determine if natural killer cell p30-related protein (NKp30) isoform expression and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), and circulating ligand B7-H6 are prognostic of EFS or OS.
OUTLINE: Patients stratified with biopsy-confirmed post-ASCT persistent disease who are also enrolled on Children's Oncology Group (COG)-A3973 or COG-ANBL0532 are assigned to treatment Arm II. Patients in the first set of strata are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
ARM I: Beginning on day 56-85 post-ASCT, patients receive isotretinoin orally (PO) twice daily (BID) for 14 days. Treatment repeats every 28 days for 6 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients may cross over to Arm II provided they have not experienced disease progression and have not received any further anti-neuroblastoma therapy following completion of isotretinoin therapy. (closed to accrual as of 4/16/2009)
ARM II: Beginning on day 56-85 post-ASCT, patients receive immunotherapy comprising sargramostim (GM-CSF) subcutaneously (SC) or intravenously (IV) over 2 hours on days 0-13 during courses 1, 3, and 5 and dinutuximab IV over 10-20 hours on days 3-6 of courses 1-5. Patients also receive aldesleukin IV continuously on days 0-3 and 7-10 during courses 2 and 4. Immunotherapy repeats every 28 days for 5 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients also receive isotretinoin as in Arm I beginning on day 11 of immunotherapy.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up periodically for 10 years.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Given IV
Other names: 125-L-Serine-2-133-interleukin 2, Proleukin, r-serHuIL-2, Recombinant Human IL-2, Recombinant Human Interleukin-2
Given IV
Other names: Ch 14.18UTC, Ch14.18, Dinutuximab Beta, MOAB Ch14.18, monoclonal antibody Ch14.18, Qarziba, Unituxin
Given PO
Other names: 13-cis retinoic acid, 13-cis-Retinoate, 13-cis-Retinoic Acid, 13-cis-Vitamin A Acid, 13-cRA, Absorica, Accure, Accutane, Amnesteem, cis-Retinoic Acid, Cistane, Claravis, Isotretinoinum, Isotrex, Isotrexin, Myorisan, Neovitamin A, Neovitamin A Acid, Oratane, Retinoicacid-13-cis, Ro 4-3780, Ro-4-3780, Roaccutan, Roaccutane, Roacutan, Sotret, ZENATANE
Correlative studies
Correlative studies
Ancillary studies
Other names: Quality of Life Assessment
Given IV or SC
Other names: 23-L-Leucinecolony-Stimulating Factor 2, DRG-0012, Leukine, Prokine, rhu GM-CFS, Sagramostim, Sargramostatin
Time frame: Three years
Comparison to determine if RA + Immunotherapy improves EFS as compared to RA Only
Time frame: Three years
Comparison to determine if RA + Immunotherapy improves EFS as compared to RA Only for the subgroup of randomized patients with INSS Stage 4 disease. Descriptive comparison of outcome data for patients with persistent disease documented by biopsy to historical data for the analogous patients from CCG-3981.
Time frame: Three years
EFS for patients receiving RA + Immunotherapy following the cessation of the randomized portion of the study.
Time frame: From enrollment to follow-up
Proportion of patients experiencing at least one Grade 3 or higher toxicity.
Time frame: Courses 1-6
Number of courses of therapy delivered for patients randomized to RA + Immunotherapy vs. patients non-randomly assigned to RA + Immunotherapy, excluding patients with persistent disease.
Time frame: Three years
Comparison to determine if RA + Immunotherapy improves OS as compared to RA Only. Comparison to determine if RA + Immunotherapy improves OS as compared to RA only and for the subgroup of randomized patients with INSS Stage 4 disease.
Time frame: Three years
OS for patients receiving RA + Immunotherapy following the cessation of the randomized portion of the study.
Time frame: Up to 10 years
The average level of HACA at each collection time point during immunotherapy will be calculated.
Time frame: Up to 10 years
In general, descriptive summaries will include n, mean, standard deviation, median, minimum, maximum and 90% confidence intervals for continuous variables, and n and percent for categorical variables. Summaries will present data by assessment time when appropriate.
Time frame: Baseline to up to 10 years
A descriptive analysis of the change from baseline of MRD will be performed. Also, a Wilcoxon rank-sum test will be performed to compare the median change from baseline of MRD between the two treatment arms. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model will test to see if the change in MRD burden is associated with EFS or OS.
Time frame: Baseline to up to 10 years
A multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model will test to see if the dinutuximab serum level, HACA titer, effector cell function, or serum marker for effector cell activation are associated with EFS or OS.
Time frame: 1 week before first sargramostim injection (day -1 of course 1)
Kaplan-Meier plots of EFS and OS will be generated after dichotomization using the median value for the cohort. To determine the prognostic value of circulating B7-H6 level, univariate analysis will be performed using a log rank test for EFS and OS. In multivariable analysis of EFS and OS, Cox models will be used to test for the independent prognostic ability of circulating B7-H6 level, adjusting for significant prognostic factors including MYCN status, INSS stage, histology and age at diagnosis.
Time frame: Up to 10 years
Kaplan-Meier plots of EFS will be generated for the three genotype subgroups of FcR as well as for the three genotype subgroups of Kir/Kir-ligand. In addition, a log rank test comparison will be made in a pairwise fashion of each of the genotypes within FcR and within Kir/Kir-ligand.
Time frame: Up to 10 years
Kaplan-Meier plots of EFS will be generated for the three genotype subgroups of FcR as well as for the three genotype subgroups of Kir/Kir-ligand. In addition, a log rank test comparison will be made in a pairwise fashion of each of the genotypes within FcR and within Kir/Kir-ligand.
Time frame: At 4 hours after administration on day 14 of course 1
To determine if there is a relationship of the peak serum concentration level with EFS, the term for this level will be tested in a Cox proportional hazards model. To determine if there is a relationship of the peak serum concentration level with toxicity rates, Kendall's Tau statistic will be calculated.
Time frame: Up to 10 years
Will be descriptively compared.
Time frame: 1 week before first sargramostim injection (day -1 of course 1)
Kaplan-Meier plots of EFS and OS will be generated after dichotomization using the median value for the cohort. To determine the prognostic value of NKp30 isoform expression and SNP, univariate analysis will be performed using a log rank test for EFS and OS. In multivariable analysis of EFS and OS, Cox models will be used to test for the independent prognostic ability of NKp30 isoform expression and SNP, adjusting for significant prognostic factors including v-MYC myelocytomatosis viral related oncogene, neuroblastoma derived (avian) (MYCN) status, INSS stage, histology and age at diagnosis.
Time frame: Up to 10 years
A Fisher's exact test will be performed to determine if the presence of naturally occurring anti-glycan antibodies correlates with allergic reactions. A Wilcoxon test will be performed to determine if the presence of naturally occurring anti-glycan antibodies correlates with blood levels of dinutuximab.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Nih
Phase III Randomized Study of Chimeric Antibody 14.18 (Ch14.18) in High Risk Neuroblastoma Following Myeloablative Therapy and Autologous Stem Cell Rescue
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT00567567
Localized Resectable Neuroblastoma, Localized Unresectable Neuroblastoma
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00904241
Ganglioneuroblastoma, Localized Resectable Neuroblastoma
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01175356
Ganglioneuroblastoma, Localized Resectable Neuroblastoma
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00033293
Localized Resectable Neuroblastoma, Localized Unresectable Neuroblastoma
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial Details