Surgical aortic valve replacement
ProcedureSAVR
NCT Number: NCT06924151
To establish the safety and effectiveness of surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients with isolated severe, calcific aortic stenosis who are at low surgical risk.
Interested in participating?
Request InfoAll sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Japanese Red Cross Aichi Medical Center Nagoya Daiichi Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi-ken, Japan
This study is the Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Multi-center Study of Isolated SAVR in Low Risk AS Patients (The AMETHYST trial). Patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive either SAVR or transcatheter heart valve replacement (TAVR) with a commercially available surgical and transcatheter bioprosthetic valves. The aim of this study was to assess the non-inferiority of SAVR compared with TAVR for the combined endpoints of death from any cause, stroke and rehospitalization (hospitalization related to biological valves or procedures or heart failure) at 1 year postoperatively. Patients will be seen for follow-up visits at discharge, 30 days, and annually through 10 years.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
AND 2. NYHA class ≥ II OR Exercisee test that demonstrates a limited exercise capacity, abnormal blood pressure response, or arrhythmia OR Asymptomatic patients with LVEF <50%
Exclusion criteria
Candidates will be excluded from the study if any of the following conditions are present:
SAVR
TAVR
Time frame: at 1 year post procedure
Time frame: at one year
Time frame: at one year
Time frame: at one year
Time frame: at one year
Time frame: at one year
Time frame: at one year
Time frame: at 30 days
Time frame: at one year
Time frame: at one year
Time frame: at one year
Time frame: at one year
Time frame: at one year
Time frame: at one year
Time frame: at one year
Time frame: at 30 days
Time frame: at 30 days
Time frame: at 30 days
Time frame: at one year
Time frame: at 30 days
Time frame: at 30 days and one year
Time frame: at 30 days
Time frame: at 30 days and one year
Time frame: at 30 days
Time frame: at 30 days
Time frame: at 30 days
Time frame: at 30 days and one year
Time frame: at 30 days and one year
NYHA Classification criteria:
Class I: Subjects with cardiac disease but without resulting limitations of physical activity Class II: Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in slight limitation of physical activity Class III: Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in marked limitation of physical activity Class IV: Subjects with cardiac disease resulting in inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort
Time frame: at 30 days and one year
Time frame: up to one year
Time frame: up to one year
Time frame: at 30 days
The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire is a 23-item, self-administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms (frequency, severity and recent change), social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life.
This instrument was developed and validated by John Spertus. John is Director of Cardiovascular Education and Outcomes Research at the Mid America Heart Institute, and he is also a Professor of Medicine at the University of Missouri - Kansas City.
In the KCCQ, an overall summary score can be derived from the physical function, symptom (frequency and severity), social function and quality of life domains. For each domain, the validity, reproducibility, responsiveness and interpretability have been independently established. Scores are transformed to a range of 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status. For brevity, only the performance characteristics of the overall summary score are presented in this discussion.
Time frame: at 30 days
EQ-5D-5L: Measures 5 domains (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) that can be converted to utilities using an algorithm. Utilities range from 0 to 1, with 1 representing perfect health, and 0 corresponding to the worst imaginable health state
Time frame: at one year
It is an 11-question measure that tests five areas of cognitive function:
orientation, registration, attention and calculation, recall, and language. The maximum score is 30. A score of 23 or lower is indicative of cognitive impairment.
Time frame: at one year
Time frame: at 30 days and one year
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Osaka University
Other
the Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Multi-center Study to Establish the Safety and Effectiveness of Isolated Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low Risk Patients Who Have Symptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis
Acronym: AMETHYST
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06991517
Aortic Stenosis, Aortic Valve Disease
St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
View Trial DetailsNCT04204915
Aortic Stenosis, Aortic Valve Disease
Garran, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
View Trial DetailsNCT07479992
Aortic Stenosis, Aortic Valve Disease
Bonn, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT04234841
Aortic Stenosis, Aortic Valve Disease
Stevenage, Hertforshire, United Kingdom
View Trial Details