Operating room at Aga Khan University Hospital
Karachi, Sindh, 3500, Pakistan
NCT Number: NCT01958138
The study will be done in paediatric patients by comparing two different techniques of Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) removal under deep anesthetic plane.
The both study techniques will be compared for safe LMA removal on the basis of adverse airway events and emergence time duration and recovery room stay timing.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me2 year–10 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Karachi, Sindh, 3500, Pakistan
The group-II LMA will removed at end expiratory isoflurane MAC of 1.2% with 60% nitrous oxide and 40% oxygen. In both groups; LMA will be removed with inflated cuff, throat was suctioned and patients were turned into lateral recovery position.
Isoflurane and nitrous oxide were turned off and 100% oxygen supplemented till the patient had regained consciousness. All participants were transported to Post Anesthesia Care Unit (PACU) once ensured airway patency and peripheral oxygen saturation (Sp02) greater than 93% on room air. Children were allowed to wake up effortlessly in PACU at oxygen 5 litters/minutes via Hudson mask.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Prior to LMA removal in group-I, isoflurane MAC awake (MAC less than 0.5) will be achieved in expiratory gases with 60% nitrous oxide and 40% oxygen. Propofol 1 mg/Kg will be combined with Isoflurane MAC awake and LMA will be removed after 20 seconds of propofol administration in group-I. The group-II LMA will be removed at end expiratory isoflurane MAC of 1.2% with 60% nitrous oxide and 40% oxygen
Other names: group-II (alone isoflurane MAC 1.2%)
Time frame: 15 minutes of continuous monitoring and time frame was started from the LMA removal
Smooth LMA removal will be assessed by adverse airway events like; coughing, bucking, hypersalivation, O2 desaturation (Sp02<90%), airway obstruction (noisy or stridor breathing) requiring jaw support, laryngospasm, bronchospasm, retching and vomiting, time duration from LMA removal up to 15 minutes.
Time frame: 15 minutes of continuous monitoring and time frame was started from the LMA removal
Impact on emergence time duration because of intervention such as delayed awakening or responding
Time frame: 0-45 minutes of continuous monitoring and time frame was started from the PACU admission to discharge
Impact of intervention on post anaesthesia care unit admission to discharge time duration
Aga Khan University
Other
Isoflurane Versus Combination Of Propofol With Isoflurane For Removal Of Laryngeal Mask Airway In Children
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07338578
Complication of Anesthesia, Hemodynamic Stability
Istanbul, Uskudar, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT05682300
Complication of Anesthesia
Valladolid, Castille and León, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT05563727
Complication of Anesthesia, Sedation-related Complications
Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06667947
Complication of Anesthesia
Sur, Di̇yarbakir, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details