Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03097263

Is the Walking Velocity an Efficient Outcome of Rehabilitation Program in Non- Specific Low Back Pain Patient

Despite the prevalence of chronic low back pain, functional symptomatology of this disease remains poor and treatment decisions are based mainly on subjective data (importance and pain tolerance). However, there are some experimental elements that involve objective assessment of locomotor capabilities - at forefront objectives which the walking velocity in the evaluation of this pathology in terms of severity of functional impairment. Recent evidence suggest the effectiveness of physical rehabilitation program for improving patients functional capacities and their reintegration in socio-professional life. This retrospective study aims to quantify the evolution of the parameters collected during standardized walking tests performed before and after rehabilitation program. These patients have systematically carry out a comfortable walk test (400m walk test) and a brisk walk test (200m) at the beginning and end of their program. Furthermore, a maximal stress test on a treadmill was performed before the program in order to detect any cardiovascular events and to allow the personalization of the effort level required (target heart rate) during rehabilitation. In this study the evolution of the comfortable and fast speed will be collected and compared with the stress test data, and other measured parameters (functional score of Quebec, muscle Tests Shirado and Sorensen).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–70 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Rehabiltiation department CHU Dijon

Dijon, 21079, France

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Female or male
  • age between 18 and 70
  • Non-specific low back pain - achieved rehabilitation program

Exclusion criteria

  • inflammatory diseases
  • cancer
  • infectious diseases

Treatment and study plan

Physical Rehabilitation program

Other

Primary outcomes

  1. COMFORTABLE WALKING SPEED (TEST OF 400M)

    Time frame: 4 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. 200m fast walk test walking velocity

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  2. Quebec score

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  3. Shirado test

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  4. Sorensen test

    Time frame: 4 weeks

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon

Other

Registry information

Acronym: MARLO

Important dates

Study start
2014
Primary completion
2016
Study completion
2016
First posted
Mar 31, 2017
Registry last updated
Mar 31, 2017

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.