Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06156800

Is Radiation-before-pathology a Feasible Approach in the Palliative Oncology Setting? A Pragmatic Clinical Trial

When a doctor suspects cancer, often a biopsy is taken for testing to confirm if cancer is present. Usually, doctors would wait for the results of a biopsy before delivering radiation, but this may lead to a patient having to wait for a treatment that he or she urgently needs.

With long wait times for biopsies in Canada, this may lead to symptoms and risks of complications from cancer in the meantime. Therefore, this study is being done to answer the following question: Is it safe and feasible to deliver radiation before obtaining a biopsy in a carefully selected group of patients who urgently need radiation treatment.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Conditions

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre

London, Ontario, N6A 5W9, Canada

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

David Palma, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

519-685-8650

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 years or older
  • Willing to provide informed consent
  • Palliative treatment intent: either metastatic or incurable locally advanced disease
  • Tissue diagnosis is not required for determination of dose/fractionation scheme
  • Recent cross-sectional imaging [for example - Computed Tomography (CT), Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT)] of the area to be treated, done within the past 3 months
  • Treating physician considers the pre-test probability of cancer greater than 95 percent based on clinical judgement and radiological findings.
  • The patient has at least 1 site of cancer amenable to biopsy
  • As per standard practices, if the radiation oncologist will be radiating the only site available to biopsy, they should proceed with caution. Participants should only be enrolled on trial if the risk of harm from delaying Radiation Therapy (RT) significantly outweighs the risks of possible non-diagnostic tissue. If the participant may potentially be eligible for systemic therapy, the treating radiation oncologist should consult a medical oncologist for an opinion regarding the risks of non-diagnostic molecular testing. The weighing of these priorities should be thoroughly discussed with the participant and the discussion should be documented.
  • Reasons for radiating a participant with a single lesion prior to biopsy include:
  • Spinal cord compression (actual or impending) and inoperable
  • Brain metastasis with significant symptoms or neurologic deficits and inoperable
  • Other lesions causing neurologic deficit
  • Pulmonary lesion causing or threatening lung obstruction
  • Uncontrolled bleeding (including hemoptysis and hematuria)
  • Superior vena cava obstruction (actual or impending)
  • Limited upside to molecular testing, as determined by the medical oncologist (for example - participant unfit for available systemic therapies, limited options for systemic therapy)
  • Radiation is considered urgent (for example - participant should receive radiation prior to biopsy date) o Urgent indications may include but are not limited to the reasons listed previously, as well as the following:
  • Painful metastases or primary lesion not adequately responding to analgesia
  • Symptomatic brain metastases
  • Bleeding
  • Impending pathologic fracture

Exclusion criteria

  • Participant is potentially eligible for curative treatment
  • Clinical suspicion of lymphoma o Some features may be suggestive of lymphoma, including fever or night sweats (for example - B symptoms excluding weight loss), or imaging showing well-defined, homogenous lymphadenopathy. These findings are not exclusion criteria specifically, but should be considered by the clinician in formulating their differential diagnosis.

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Percent of Inappropriate Use of Radiation Therapy in Participants with Urgent Indications Treated Prior to Biopsy Results

    Time frame: 2 weeks after biopsy results

    The percentage of participants in whom management would have differed, based on the final pathology, if the pathology had been known prior to radiation therapy.

    Inappropriate use of radiation therapy is defined as:

    If a non-cancerous process was treated, Or, the use of radiation therapy was inappropriate in hindsight (for example, the participant would have clearly been better treated with alternative options).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Histological Diagnostic Accuracy

    Time frame: 2 weeks after biopsy results

    Histological diagnostic accuracy is defined as the percentage of biopsies that yielded a histological diagnosis. This will include a comparison of diagnostic yield between biopsies done at radiated vs. non-radiated sites.

  2. Molecular Testing Accuracy

    Time frame: 2 weeks after biopsy results

    Molecular testing accuracy is defined as the percentage of biopsies that yielded enough viable tissue for molecular testing/diagnosis.

  3. Number of Biopsy Attempts Required

    Time frame: 2 weeks after biopsy

  4. Biopsy Complication Rates

    Time frame: 2 weeks after biopsy

  5. Time from Enrollment to First Fraction of Radiation Therapy

    Time frame: Within 1 year after enrollment

  6. Time from Enrollment to Biopsy

    Time frame: Within 1 year after enrollment

  7. Evidence of Radiation Effect in Biopsy

    Time frame: 2 weeks after biopsy results

  8. Overall Survival

    Time frame: 1 year after enrollment

  9. Edmonton Symptom Assessment System Revised Scores

    Time frame: 2 weeks after radiation therapy of 2 weeks after biopsy

    Participants will rate their symptoms on a scale of 1 to 10, 0 being the best and 10 being the worst.

    Examples of symptoms included in the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System revised are pain, tiredness, nausea, appetite, depression, and so on.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

David Palma, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

519-685-8650

Sympascho Young, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

David Palma

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Is Radiation-before-pathology a Feasible Approach in the Palliative Oncology Setting? A Pragmatic Clinical Trial (RT-NOW)

Acronym: RT-NOW

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2027
First posted
Dec 5, 2023
Registry last updated
Jul 25, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.