Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06439953

Irrisept Solution for Instrumented Spine Surgery

Various spine surgeons perform wound irrigation using saline mixed with vancomycin, relying on mechanical debridement of non-viable tissue, physical disruption of biofilm, and bacteriostatic effect against gram positive flora. When used as a powder, topical application of vancomycin has demonstrated increased risk of symptomatic seroma formation, which is an adverse outcome that often requires bedside or intra-operative aspiration. Broad-spectrum antiseptic agents, such as Irrisept, offer bacteriocidal properties to eliminate hardware inoculation, thereby minimizing the risk of deep space infection, while obviating the risk of seroma development.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Rhode Island Hospital

Providence, Rhode Island, 02903, United States

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Albert S. Woo, MD

CONTACT

Alexander Chernysh

CONTACT

[email protected]

401-444-9868

Jared S. Fridley, MD

CONTACT

About this study

Spinal instrumentation remains the standard of care in the treatment of various traumatic, oncologic, and degenerative spinal pathologies, often requiring the implantation of hardware to stabilize the bony column. In the setting of an aging patient population and expanding indications for instrumentation in younger patients, the number of spinal operations performed has risen substantially within the past decade. Although these procedures have proven to enhance patient quality of life, spinal instrumentation is not without post-operative complication, most notable of which are surgical site infection, seroma formation, and wound breakdown. Such complications can result in notable negative sequelae. Recurrent seroma may compress underlying neurologic structures or increase pressure along the incision, thereby precipitating wound dehiscence and inoculation of the surgical site with pathogenic organisms. Deep space infections often result in prolonged hospitalization, long-term suppressive antibiotic therapy, hardware removal, and permanent disability, which increases cost burden at the patient and hospital level. As such, preventative strategies to reduce the rate of complications following spinal instrumentation remain paramount. Within recent years, attention has turned to various irrigation methods to terminally sterilize prosthetic devices and wound beds, thereby minimizing bacterial colonization and biofilm formation that would otherwise predispose infection.

Irrisept (Irrimax Corporation, Gainesville, Florida) is a solution comprised of 0.05% chlorhexidine gluconate in 99.95% sterile water administered through a proprietary, low-pressure lavage mechanism that has demonstrated efficacy as a bacteriocidal agent in orthopedic hip and knee arthroplasty procedures. Whereas other antiseptic irrigation solutions, such as vancomycin-saline lavage, are routinely used to prevent surgical site infection, relative inertness against gram negative organisms and potential predisposition toward seroma formation render them non-ideal for use in spine surgery. Despite the utility of dilute chlorhexidine gluconate as a prophylactic irrigant, there exist gaps in knowledge with regard to the efficacy of Irrisept to prevent post-operative complications following spinal instrumentation. The central hypothesis of this proposal is that prophylactic use of Irrisept irrigation will result in fewer surgical site infections, clinically significant seromas, and gram negative or atypical infections when compared to standard of care irrigation (vancomycin-saline solution with or without topical vancomycin powder).

Proposed is a prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing rates of post-operative complications following use of Irrisept irrigation alone versus vancomycin-saline lavage with or without topical vancomycin powder (standard of care) in patients aged 18 years or older who undergo posterior cervical, thoracic, lumbar, and/or sacral spinal instrumentation for various indications (deformity, malignancy, degenerative pathology, and trauma) at Rhode Island Hospital.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age: 18+ years old
  • Indications: deformity, oncologic, degenerative, trauma
  • Standard layer-by-layer closure
  • Locoregional flap-based closure

Exclusion criteria

  • Acute/chronic open wounds (spine or non-spine)
  • On-going non-spinal infection within 30 days of index operation
  • Concurrent antibiotic use (for spine or non-spine infections)
  • History of prior spinal infection
  • Allergy to vancomycin or chlorhexidine
  • Suspicion for osteomyelitis
  • Other surgery within 90 days post-operatively fromm index
  • Concurrent enrollment in other trial

Treatment and study plan

Chlorhexidine gluconate solution

Device

Evaluating the prophylactic use of Irrisept irrigation alone

Other names: Irrisept irrigation

Vancomycin

Drug

Evaluating the use of versus vancomycin-saline irrigation with or without topical vancomycin

Other names: Vancomycin-saline

Primary outcomes

  1. Occurrence of surgical site infection

    Time frame: 90 days post-operatively

    Development of infection after index spinal instrumentation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mortality

    Time frame: 12 months post-operatively

    Capture mortality rates after index spinal instrumentation

  2. Duration of index hospitalization

    Time frame: 12 months post-operatively

    Capture duration of index hospitalization after index spinal instrumentation

  3. Occurrence of 30-day readmission

    Time frame: 30 days post-operatively

    Capture 30-day readmission rates after index spinal instrumentation

  4. Occurrence of wound dehiscence

    Time frame: 12 months post-operatively

    Capture all incidences of wound dehiscence after index spinal instrumentation

  5. Time to closed suction drain removal

    Time frame: 12 months post-operatively

    Capture the time interval to closed suction drain removal after index spinal instrumentation

  6. Presence of atypical micro-organisms on wound fluid laboratory culture

    Time frame: 12 months post-operatively

    Capture the presence of atypical micro-organisms after index spinal instrumentation

  7. Cost of spine surgery care from surgery to 12-month post-operative follow up

    Time frame: 12 months post-operatively

    Consider associated total costs of spinal instrumentation after index spinal instrumentation by comparing total surgical costs and post-surgical outcome expenses of those with and without Irrisept irrigation use

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Alexander Chernysh

CONTACT

[email protected]

401-444-9868

Owen Leary

CONTACT

[email protected]

401-6068388

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Rhode Island Hospital

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Impact of Prophylactic Use of Irrisept Irrigation System for Spinal Instrumentation

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Jun 3, 2024
Registry last updated
Nov 20, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.