Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00854815

Irrigation Versus No Irrigation for Perforated Appendicitis

The purpose is to quantify the effect of irrigation during laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

1 month–17 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Children's Mercy Hospital

Kansas City, Missouri, 64108, United States

About this study

This will be a prospective, randomized clinical trial involving patients who present to the hospital with perforated appendicitis. This will be a definitive study.

Power calculation was based on abscess rate in the previous prospective study. An unacceptable abscess rate needed to be chosen. Our current rate is 20%, or one-fifth of the patients. If this were to increase by 15%, it would place just over one third of the patients at risk which would be unacceptable. This is comparable to the 36% rejection level we used for the previous IRB approved trial (#07 02-031). Using a delta of 0.15 with alpha of 0.05 and power of 0.8, the sample size is 109 patients in each arm. Therefore we will anticipate enrolling 220.

Subjects will be those children who are found to have severe inflammatory changes on imaging or a high clinical suspicion of perforation. Permission will be obtained from parents prior to the operation. All of these children will be under duress prior to randomization, therefore we request waiving assent as we have done with the previous perforated appendicitis studies.

The final decision to include a child in the study will made after perforation has been visually confirmed during surgery. Perforation will be defined as an identifiable hole in the appendix or stool in the abdomen. The randomization assignment will be made known at the initiation of the operation, and confirmation of perforation will confirm the patient will utilize the next randomization slot.

The irrigation group will have suction irrigator set up with a 1 liter bag of normal saline. The surgeon must use at least 500 ml of this bag but may use as much as they choose.

The no irrigation group will have the suction irrigator set up without the saline attachment. This will leave them with the capacity for suction only. Since several suction devices exist, this will assure the same type of suction for both groups.

After the operation, both groups will be managed in the same manner. When the patient is tolerating a regular diet, on oral pain medication and has been afebrile for over 12 hours, they will be discharged on oral antibiotics to complete a course of 7 days. If they stay until the 5th post-operative day, a white blood cell count will be checked, which if it is normal, they will be discharged to home without antibiotics. This is standard post-operative care as delineated by our previous prospective, randomized.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Under 18 yrs old
  • Perforation identified as hole in the appendix or fecalith in the abdomen

Exclusion criteria

  • No perforation
  • A significant comorbidity that would limit their ability to recover from appendectomy in a normal fashion

Treatment and study plan

Irrigation

Procedure

Irrigation of the area with at least 500ml NS using the power suction/irrigator

Other names: washout

No irrigation

Procedure

Suction only using suction/irrigator

Other names: suction

Primary outcomes

  1. Post-operative abscess

    Time frame: 1 month

Secondary outcomes

  1. operating time

    Time frame: 1 day

  2. length of stay

    Time frame: 2 weeks

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas City

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2008
Primary completion
2012
Study completion
2012
First posted
Mar 3, 2009
Registry last updated
Aug 1, 2012

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.