NCT Number: NCT00259064
Iressa v BSC (Best Supportive Care) in First Line NSCLC
The purpose of the study is to determine if the addition of Iressa to Best Supportive Care treatment will increase the progression free survival of chemo-naïve, poor performance status patients, with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeKey information
Conditions
Age range
18 year–130 year
Sex eligibility
All sexes
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Primary location
Research Site, Bedford Park, Australia
Who can participate
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
- Histologically or cytologically confirmed NSCLC
- NSCLC - locally advanced (Stage IIIB) or metastatic (stage IV) disease, not amenable to curative surgery or radiotherapy
- Not suitable for chemotherapy
- WHO Performance status 2 or 3
Exclusion criteria
- Newly diagnosed CNS mets
- Less than 4 weeks since completion of radiotherapy or persistence of any radiotherapy related toxicity
- Other co-existing malignancies
- ALT/AST greater than 5 x upper limit of normal
- ANC less than 1.0 x 109/L or platelets less than 100 x 109/L
Treatment and study plan
Placebo
OtherPrimary outcomes
-
To compare Iressa v best supportive care in terms of progression free survival
Time frame: Progression-free survival
Secondary outcomes
-
To compare Iressa v best supportive care in terms of objective tumour response rate
Time frame: Overall objective tumour response rate (CR and PR) according to the RECIST criteria
-
To compare Iressa v best supportive care in terms of overall survival
Time frame: Time to death
-
To compare Iressa v best supportive care in terms of quality of life
Time frame: Improvement in patient-reported functionality as measured by trial outcome index, comprised of the physical and functional well being sections and LCS of FACT-L and quality of life measured by the FACT-L total score
-
To compare Iressa v best supportive care in terms of tolerability
Time frame: Adverse event profile (type, frequency and severity of adverse events); laboratory parameters and vital signs
Other outcomes
-
To investigate the correlation of the expression of biomarkers in tumour tissue obtained prior to gefitinib therapy with gefitinib clinical efficacy and to determine a set of biomarkers to enable patient selection for therapy.
Time frame: Efficacy (objective response rate and progression free survival), toxicity, EGFR signalling pathways markers, RNA expression profile, gene polymorphisms of pre specified germline and tumour genes, DNA methylation, plasma and urine proteomics
-
To compare gefitinib + BSC versus Placebo + BSC in terms of Health Resource Utilisation
Time frame: The use of selected items of resource and concomitant medications including: number of in patient days, number of out patient visits, number of invasive procedures, pallative radiotherapy, concomitant medications.
-
To compare gefitinib + BSC versus Placebo + BSC in terms of changes in pain and fatigue
Time frame: Changes in pain and fatigue as measured by the single items from the FACT-L physical well being domain.
Sponsors and collaborators
Lead sponsor
AstraZeneca
Industry
Registry information
Official study title
A Phase II Multicentre Randomised, Parallel Group, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of ZD1839 (IRESSATM) (250MG Tablet) Plus Best Supportive Care (BSC) Versus Placebo Plus BSC in Chemotherapy-Naive Patients With Advanced (Stage IIIB or IV) Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) and Poor Performance Status
Acronym: INSTEP
Important dates
- Study start
- 2004
- Primary completion
- 2007
- Study completion
- 2016
- First posted
- Nov 29, 2005
- Registry last updated
- Jun 2, 2016
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Related clinical trials
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
A Study Evaluating the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Efficacy of TT125-802 in Subjects With Advanced Solid Tumors
NCT06403436
Adult Disease, Adult Solid Tumor
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
View Trial DetailsAdvancing Brigatinib Properties in ALK+ NSCLC Patients by Deep Phenotyping
NCT04318938
NSCLC
Berlin, Germany
View Trial DetailsResidual Disease Evaluation of Resected NSCLC by cirDNA Analysis
NCT05165160
Bronchial Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
Montpellier, France
View Trial DetailsOsimertinib Treatment on EGFR T790M Plasma Positive NSCLC Patients (APPLE)
NCT02856893
NSCLC
Brussels, Bruxelles Région, Belgium
View Trial Details