Ariel University
Ariel, Israel
NCT Number: NCT05988775
To determine whether there is an ipsilateral transfer of motor skill from the lower to the upper limb in healthy adults.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me20 year–35 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Ariel, Israel
In a single-blind randomized controlled study,45 healthy subjects were randomly allocated to one of three single intervention groups: (1) "Leg Training" group (LT) (15 participants) practiced reaching movement (RM) sequences with the non-dominant left lower limb towards the numbered illuminating switch; (2) "Sequence observation" group (SO) (15 participants) observed the identical sequences of the illuminating switches (Switches Observation (SO) group); and (3) "Nature Movie Watching" (MW) group. (15 participants) watched a neutral nature video. Each subject was asked to attend two consecutive sessions, day after day. The first session included familiarization practice of the motor task, a pretest, a single session intervention (according to group randomization), and a posttest. Subjects participated in two sessions. The second session included a retest, 24 hours after the training. The predefined sequence consisted of six reaching movements in the following order of switches: 1, 4, 3, 5, 4, 2.
Recording apparatus used in tests (pretest, posttest, and retest) and training: A custom-made testing device was set up on a rectangular table with a smooth laminated tabletop of 105 cm × 80 cm and adjustable height. Five switch-led units of 5 cm × 8 cm × 5 cm, each composed of a large push-button switch and a red light-emitting diode (LED), attached to the tabletop in a 38-cm radius half circle, successively numbered from 1 to 5. The system was operated by a desktop computer, interfaced with a data acquisition card of LABVIEW software. The algorithm allowed parameters selection of LED activation (illumination) sequence, duration of RM, the delay between RMs, and the number of RM repetitions. Activation of a specific unit LED was a cue for the subject to reach toward that unit and press the push-button switch. Reaching the switch of an activated unit deactivated it, and the response time, between the activated and deactivated LED, was recorded.
Tests (motor tasks): The non-dominant left arm was tested. Motor task: The subjects performed a sequential movement task on a table with push button switches with lights sequentially turning on to indicate the order. Each switch lit up for 1 second, or until hit. Initially, the participants were required to perform 3 sequences to familiarize themselves with the setup, the task, and the sequence. Then, they performed the pre-test which consisted of two blocks of 5 sequences, i.e. 10 sequences, with a 30s break between blocks. After this, the participants underwent one of the following predetermined interventions groups:
Two outcome measures were used: 1. response time (s), 2. failure (%) of the reaching movements, defined as failure to reach the switch in the allotted time (1 sec), or pressing the wrong buzzer.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Participants sat on a chair with their left heel resting on the table with the push button switches. participants performed 10 blocks of the aforementioned sequence with their leg, with a 30s break between each block.
Participants observed 10 blocks of the sequence with the lights alternating automatically, with a 30s break between each block.
Participants observed 10 blocks of the sequence with the lights alternating automatically, with a 30s break between each block.
Time frame: baseline - before the training session, post-test - immediately after the training session
Average time of movements, measured from the time the switch lights up until it is pressed
Time frame: post-test - immediately after the training session, follow up - 24 hours after the training session
Average time of movements, measured from the time the switch lights up until it is pressed
Time frame: baseline - before the training session, follow up - 24 hours after the training session
Average time of movements, measured from the time the switch lights up until it is pressed
Time frame: baseline - before the training session, post-test - immediately after the training session
Percentage of the reaching movements in which the participant failed to reach the switch in the allotted time (1 sec) or pressed the wrong buzzer.
Time frame: post-test - immediately after the training session, follow up - 24 hours after the training session
Percentage of the reaching movements in which the participant failed to reach the switch in the allotted time (1 sec) or pressed the wrong buzzer.
Time frame: baseline - before the training session, follow up - 24 hours after the training session
Percentage of the reaching movements in which the participant failed to reach the switch in the allotted time (1 sec) or pressed the wrong buzzer.
Ariel University
Other
Ipsilateral Transfer of Motor Skill From Lower to Upper Limb in Healthy Adults: a Randomized Controlled Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06068257
Breast Cancer, Breast Diseases
Orlando, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06702423
Healthy
London, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT07223164
Healthy
Irvine, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05595902
Healthy
Kadıköy, Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details