Ipatasertib
DrugOral tablets, 400 mg, given once daily (QD) beginning on Day 1 of Cycle 1 until disease progression or intolerable toxicity.
NCT Number: NCT03072238
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of ipatasertib plus abiraterone and prednisone/prednisolone compared with placebo plus abiraterone and prednisone/prednisolone in participants with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
Male
Interventional
Phase 3
Macquarie University Hospital, Macquarie University, New South Wales, Australia
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Disease-specific Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion criteria
Disease-Specific Exclusion Criteria:
Abiraterone-Specific Exclusion Criteria:
Ipatasertib-Specific Exclusion Criteria:
Oral tablets, 400 mg, given once daily (QD) beginning on Day 1 of Cycle 1 until disease progression or intolerable toxicity.
Oral tablets of abiraterone, 1000 mg QD, taken on an empty stomach and swallowed whole with water.
Oral tablets (matched to ipatasertib appearance), given QD beginning on Day 1 of Cycle 1 until disease progression or intolerable toxicity.
Oral tablets of 5 mg, taken twice daily (BID) until disease progression or intolerable toxicity.
Time frame: Up to approximately 32 months
rPFS was defined as time from date of randomization to the first occurrence of documented disease progression (PD), as assessed by the investigator with use of the PCWG3 criteria or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. PD for soft tissue was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters (SOD) of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, including baseline, and an absolute increase of at least 5 millimeters (mm) in the SOD of target lesions; progression of non-target lesions; the appearance of one or more new lesions according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1) criteria. PD for bone lesions was defined as 2 or more new lesions compared to baseline followed by a confirmatory bone scan at least 6 weeks later according to the PCWG3 criteria. The Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimate was used to determine the median rPFS.
Time frame: Up to approximately 32 months
rPFS was defined as time from date of randomization to the first occurrence of documented PD, as assessed by the investigator with use of the PCWG3 criteria or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. PD for soft tissue was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, including baseline, and an absolute increase of at least 5 mm in the SOD of target lesions; progression of non-target lesions; the appearance of one or more new lesions according to RECIST v1.1 criteria. PD for bone lesions was defined as 2 or more new lesions compared to baseline followed by a confirmatory bone scan at least 6 weeks later according to the PCWG3 criteria. The KM estimate was used to determine the median rPFS.
Time frame: Up to approximately 6.5 years
OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. KM estimates were used to determine the median OS.
Time frame: Up to approximately 6.5 years
OS was defined as the time from randomization to death due to any cause. KM estimates were used to determine the median OS.
Time frame: Up to approximately 5.5 years
Time to pain progression was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of confirmed clinically meaningful cancer-related pain progression event. Cancer-related pain progression refers to pain onset for participants who were asymptomatic at baseline or pain worsening for those who were mildly symptomatic at baseline. Pain severity was graded on a 10-point numeric rating scale [NRS], with 0=no pain and 10=severe pain. Pain severity progression was defined as a ≥ 2-point absolute increase from baseline. KM estimates were used to determine the median time to pain progression.
Time frame: Up to approximately 5.5 years
Time to pain progression was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of confirmed clinically meaningful cancer-related pain progression event. Cancer-related pain progression refers to pain onset for participants who were asymptomatic at baseline or pain worsening for those who were mildly symptomatic at baseline. Pain severity was graded on a 10-point NRS, with 0=no pain and 10=severe pain. Pain severity progression was defined as a ≥ 2-point absolute increase from baseline. KM estimates were used to determine the median time to pain progression.
Time frame: Up to approximately 5.5 years
Time to initiation of cytotoxic chemotherapy was defined as the time interval from the date of randomization to the date of initiation of cytotoxic chemotherapy (use of antineoplastic agents: docetaxel, cabazitaxel, mitoxantrone, estramustine, cisplatin, carboplatin, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, mitomycin, irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, gemcitabine, or etoposide) for PC. KM estimates were used to determine the median time to initiation of cytotoxic chemotherapy.
Time frame: Up to approximately 5.5 years
Time to initiation of cytotoxic chemotherapy was defined as the time interval from the date of randomization to the date of initiation of cytotoxic chemotherapy (use of antineoplastic agents: docetaxel, cabazitaxel, mitoxantrone, estramustine, cisplatin, carboplatin, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, mitomycin, irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, gemcitabine, or etoposide) for PC. KM estimates were used to determine the median time to initiation of cytotoxic chemotherapy.
Time frame: Up to approximately 5.5 years
Time to function deterioration=time from date of randomization to date of 10-point or more score decrease on either EORTC QLQ-C30 5-item PF/2-item RF scale scores, held for two consecutive assessments or death within 28 days, whichever occurs first. EORTC QLQ-C30 consists of 30 questions that assess 5 aspects of participant functioning (physical,emotional,role,cognitive&social), 3 symptom scales (fatigue,nausea&vomiting,pain), global health/quality of life (GHS/QoL)&6 single items (dyspnea,insomnia,appetite loss,constipation,diarrhea&financial difficulties). PF scale has 5 questions about participants physical functioning&daily activities. RF scale has 2 questions about work/daily activities&hobbies/leisurely activities. PF&RF are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Obtained scores are linearly transformed to score range of 0-100, where higher scores indicate a higher response level (better PF)&better functioning/support.
Time frame: Up to approximately 5.5 years
Time to function deterioration=time from date of randomization to date of 10-point or more score decrease on either EORTC QLQ-C30 5-item PF/2-item RF scale scores, held for two consecutive assessments or death within 28 days, whichever occurs first. EORTC QLQ-C30 consists of 30 questions that assess 5 aspects of participant functioning (physical,emotional,role,cognitive & social), 3 symptom scales (fatigue,nausea&vomiting,pain), GHS/QoL & 6 single items (dyspnea,insomnia,appetite loss,constipation,diarrhea & financial difficulties). PF scale has 5 questions about participants physical functioning & daily activities. RF scale has 2 questions about work/daily activities & hobbies/leisurely activities. PF&RF are scored on a 4-point scale (1=Not at All to 4=Very Much). Obtained scores are linearly transformed to score range of 0-100, where higher scores indicate a higher response level (better PF) & better functioning/support.
Time frame: Up to approximately 5.5 years
Time to PSA progression was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the first occurrence of PSA progression, per the PCWG3 criteria. PSA progression was defined as a PSA increase that was ≥ 25% and ≥ 2 nanograms per milliliters (ng/mL) above the baseline or the nadir, which was confirmed by a second value ≥ 3 weeks later. KM estimate was used to determine the median time to PSA.
Time frame: Up to approximately 5.5 years
Time to PSA progression was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the first occurrence of PSA progression, per the PCWG3 criteria. PSA progression was defined as a PSA increase that was ≥ 25% and ≥ 2 ng/mL above the baseline or the nadir, which was confirmed by a second value ≥ 3 weeks later. KM estimate was used to determine the median time to PSA.
Time frame: Up to approximately 5.5 years
Time to first opioid use was defined as the time interval from the date of randomization to the date of an initiation of opioid analgesic use for cancer-related pain, and consumption reported on at least 7 consecutive days. KM estimate was used to determine the median time to first opioid use.
Time frame: Up to approximately 5.5 years
Time to first opioid use was defined as the time interval from the date of randomization to the date of an initiation of opioid analgesic use for cancer-related pain, and consumption reported on at least 7 consecutive days. KM estimate was used to determine the median time to first opioid use.
Time frame: Up to approximately 5.5 years
Time to SSE was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of an SSE. A SSE was defined using one of the following: use of external-beam radiotherapy to relieve skeletal symptoms (including initiation of radium-223 to treat symptoms of bone metastases); occurrence of a new symptomatic pathological bone fracture (vertebral or non-vertebral); clinically apparent occurrence of spinal cord compression, or a tumor-related orthopedic surgical intervention. KM estimates were used to determine the median time to SSE.
Time frame: Up to approximately 5.5 years
Time to SSE was defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of an SSE. A SSE was defined using one of the following: use of external-beam radiotherapy to relieve skeletal symptoms (including initiation of radium-223 to treat symptoms of bone metastases); occurrence of a new symptomatic pathological bone fracture (vertebral or non-vertebral); clinically apparent occurrence of spinal cord compression, or a tumor-related orthopedic surgical intervention. KM estimates were used to determine the median time to SSE.
Time frame: Up to approximately 5.5 years
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who had an objective response (OR) with measurable disease at baseline. An OR was defined as a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) on two consecutive occasions ≥ 4 weeks apart, as determined by the investigator using RECIST v1.1 and PCWG3 criteria in participants with measurable disease at baseline. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions and any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD. An estimate of ORR was calculated for each treatment arm, and its 95% CI was calculated using the Clopper-Pearson method. Percentages have been rounded off.
Time frame: Up to approximately 5.5 years
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who had an OR with measurable disease at baseline. An OR was defined as a CR or PR on two consecutive occasions ≥ 4 weeks apart, as determined by the investigator using RECIST v1.1 and PCWG3 criteria in participants with measurable disease at baseline. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions and any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD. An estimate of ORR was calculated for each treatment arm, and its 95% CI was calculated using the Clopper-Pearson method. Percentage have been rounded off.
Time frame: Up to approximately 5.5 years
DOCR was defined as the time from the first documented OR (CR or PR) to documented PD as determined by the investigator using RECIST v1.1 and PCWG3 criteria, or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions and any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to < 10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, including baseline, and an absolute increase of at least 5 mm in the SOD of target lesions; progression of non-target lesions; the appearance of one or more new lesions. DOR was estimated using the KM methodology.
Time frame: Up to approximately 5.5 years
DOCR was defined as the time from the first documented OR (CR or PR) to documented PD as determined by the investigator using RECIST v1.1 and PCWG3 criteria, or death from any cause, whichever occured first. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions and any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to < 10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline SOD. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, including baseline, and an absolute increase of at least 5 mm in the SOD of target lesions; progression of non-target lesions; the appearance of one or more new lesions. DOR was estimated using the KM methodology.
Time frame: Up to approximately 5.5 years
PSA response rate was defined as the percentage of participants achieving a PSA decline ≥ 50% from baseline. Participants without a post-baseline PSA assessment were considered to be non-responders. Percentages have been rounded off.
Time frame: Up to approximately 5.5 years
PSA response rate was defined as the percentage of participants achieving a PSA decline ≥ 50% from baseline. Participants without a post-baseline PSA assessment were considered to be non-responders. Percentages have been rounded off.
Time frame: Up to approximately 32 months
rPFS was defined as time from date of randomization to the first occurrence of documented PD, as assessed by the investigator using the PCWG3 criteria or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. PD for soft tissue was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, including baseline, and an absolute increase of at least 5 mm in the SOD of target lesions; progression of non-target lesions; the appearance of one or more new lesions. PD for bone lesions was defined as 2 or more new lesions compared to baseline followed by a confirmatory bone scan at least 6 weeks later.
Time frame: Up to 28 days after last study drug administration (approximately 6.5 years)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including abnormal laboratory values or abnormal clinical test results), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. Preexisting conditions which worsen during a study were also considered as AEs. Percentages have been rounded off.
Time frame: 1-3 hours post-dose (Cycle 1, Day 1; Cycle 1 Day 15 and Cycle 3 Day 1) and pre-dose at steady state (Cycle 1 Day 15, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1) (each cycle length= 28 days)
Plasma samples for pharmacokinetic characterization was collected at various timepoints in all participants.
Time frame: Pre-dose at steady state in Cycle 1, Day 15 and Cycle 3 Day 1 (each cycle length= 28 days)
Plasma samples for pharmacokinetic characterization was collected at various timepoints in all participants.
Hoffmann-La Roche
Industry
A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Trial Testing Ipatasertib Plus Abiraterone Plus Prednisone/Prednisolone, Relative to Placebo Plus Abiraterone Plus Prednisone/Prednisolone in Adult Male Patients With Asymptomatic or Mildly Symptomatic, Previously Untreated, Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer
Acronym: IPATential150
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04335682
Castrate Resistant Prostate Cancer, Genital Diseases
San Francisco, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05617885
Genital Diseases, Genital Diseases, Male
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04925648
Genital Diseases, Genital Diseases, Male
Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
View Trial DetailsNCT04533958
Anxiety Disorders, Genital Diseases
Brest, France
View Trial Details