Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01376089

Iodixanol Versus Iopamidol in Patients Undergoing Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomographic Imaging of Abdomen/Pelvis

The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare overall patient comfort profile between the Iso-osmolar contrast media (IOCM), iodixanol 320 mg I/mL, and a Low-osmolar contrast media (LOCM), iopamidol 370 mg I/mL in patients undergoing Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomographic (CECT) imaging of the abdomen/pelvis.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

GE Healthcare

Princeton, New Jersey, 08540, United States

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • The subject is over 18 years old.
  • Subjects are referred to undergo a CECT imaging of the abdomen/pelvis as part of their routine clinical care.

Exclusion criteria

  • The subject has known allergies to iodine or any prior history of adverse reaction to iodinated CM.
  • The subject received another administration of CM within 24 hours prior to baseline or is scheduled to receive one within the 24 hour follow-up period.
  • The subject is pregnant.
  • The subject is taking metformin (e.g., Glucophage®) but is not willing or unable to discontinue at the time of the study procedure.
  • The subject manifests thyrotoxicosis or is on dialysis.

Treatment and study plan

Iodixanol

Drug

Iodixanol 320 mg I/mL as a single iv. administration.

Other names: Visipaque

Iopamidol

Drug

Comparator agent iopamidol (Isovue) 370 mg I/mL as a single iv. administration.

Other names: Isovue

Primary outcomes

  1. Frequency of Subjects With Moderate/Severe Discomfort When Undergoing Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomographic (CECT) Imaging of the Abdomen/Pelvis.

    Time frame: Within 10 minutes post contrast administration

    Number of subjects experiencing any moderate (score of 4 - 7) to severe (score 8 - 10) discomfort for cold or heat or pain between Iodixanol and Iopamidol.

  2. Frequency of Subjects With Moderate / Severe Discomfort When Undergoing Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomographic (CECT) Imaging of the Abdomen/Pelvis.

    Time frame: Within 10 minutes post contrast administration.

    Number of subjects experiencing moderate (score of 4 -7) to severe (score of 8 - 10) discomfort for cold, heat or pain between Iodixanol and Iopamidol.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Comparison of Overall Image Quality Between Iodixanol and Iopamidol in Patients Undergoing Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomographic (CECT) Imaging of the Abdomen/Pelvis.

    Time frame: Ten minutes post contrast administration.

    Overall Image Quality rated as 'Excellent, Adequate or Poor' by radiologists blinded to the contrast administration.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

GE Healthcare

Industry

Collaborators

  • i3 Statprobe

Registry information

Official study title

A Phase 4 Randomized, Double-blind Study Comparing Patient Comfort and Safety Between Iodixanol 320 mg I/mL and Iopamidol 370 mg I/mL in Patients Undergoing Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomographic (CECT) Imaging of the Abdomen/Pelvis

Important dates

Study start
2011
Primary completion
2011
Study completion
2012
First posted
Jun 20, 2011
Registry last updated
Dec 19, 2013

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.