University of Arizona
Tucson, Arizona, 85721, United States
NCT Number: NCT05725824
Normal hearing participants will be fit with a hearing aid and different types of customized earmolds. Hearing aids will be programmed to a simulated mild, flat, sensorineural hearing loss of 30 dB HL from 250-8000Hz. Objective acoustic real ear measures and subjective ratings of sound quality and physical comfort will be evaluated and compared between earmolds. Findings will help researchers to better understand the impacts of different earmolds and how each might affect overall point-of-care.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–89 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Tucson, Arizona, 85721, United States
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Hearing aids will be fit with three different types of customized earmolds. They will only wear each earmold group for the duration of the test (total = ~2.5 hours). Hearing aids will be programmed to a simulated mild, flat, sensorineural hearing loss of 30 dB HL from 250-8000Hz. A short washout period will follow completion of testing with ear earmold group.
Time frame: 15 minutes
Evaluation of ear canal acoustics with participant wearing a hearing aid and earmold type (3d party control, in-house_Resin, in-house_PLA). Then, a thin microphone tube is placed in the ear canal to measure the average amount gain (dB SPL) across various frequencies (250-8000Hz) while the participant sits in front of a speaker playing sound samples. Results are recorded in gain (dB SPL) across frequencies. Once complete, the earmold type is changed and recording is repeated until all ear mold material types have been tested for each individual. Arms/Groups were collapsed for RM-ANOVA to compare between various earmold types. A post-hoc paired t-test w/ Bonferroni correction was utilized to compare ear mold material types.
Time frame: 2nd listening session appointment (15 minutes)
A questionnaire eliciting patient perception of physical comfort, quality of voice, and overall self-perceived satisfaction. Includes 12 items (5 point) that are scored on a 0 to 100, with 100 representing best possible function/rating
Time frame: Prior to 2nd listening session appointment (15 minutes)
Physical dimensions of each ear mold type (3rd party Control, in-house_Resin, in-house_PLA) were taken using digital calipers in millimeters prior to being worn by participants.
Time frame: Prior to 2nd listening session appointment (15 minutes)
The total raw cost ($) for each ear mold type (3rd party_control, in-house_RES, and in-house_PLA).
University of Arizona
Other
Novel Technology Adoption in the Audiology Clinic: Investigations of Ear Tip Performance, Perceptions, and Experiences
Acronym: IETPPE
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04618315
Ear Diseases, Hearing Aids
Chicago, Illinois, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04843124
Hearing Aids
Borås, Vastra Gotalandsregion, Sweden
View Trial DetailsNCT03904264
Ear Diseases, Hearing Aids
Portland, Oregon, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04840277
Hearing Aids
Borås, Vastra Gotalandsregion, Sweden
View Trial Details