Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04832334

Investigation Of The Relationship Between Imagery Ability, Balance And Functionality After Stroke

It was aimed to determine the relationship between post-stroke imagination ability, balance, and functionality, and to compare the motor imagery skills of those who had stroke with compatible healthy individuals.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

40 year–80 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Istanbul Medipol University

Istanbul, Beykoz, Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

İn the study, 20 individuals with hemiplegic or chronic hemiparesis who agreed to participate by signing the voluntary consent form, who meet the inclusion criteria, and 20 healthy individuals who are similar in terms of age, gender and education level will be included.

The individuals included in the study will be divided into two groups:

Group 1: Stroke Patients Group 2: Control Group

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Post-stroke hemiplegia or chronic hemiparesis
  • Not having any neurological disorder other than stroke
  • Not having vision problems that will affect the materials to be used during the treatment.
  • To be able to communicate enough to understand the orders given
  • Standardized Mini Mental Test (SMMT) score of 24 and above
  • Not having seen a visualization application before

Inclusion criteria

for Healthy Participants:

  • Being between the ages of 40-80
  • To be similar in terms of age, gender, education level of individuals with stroke

Exclusion criteria

  • Having an advanced degree of aphasia
  • Unilateral neglect
  • Standardized Mini Mental Test (SMMT) score below 24 points
  • Multiple stroke history
  • Having pain and limitation of joint motion that will interfere with functional activity
  • Walking restriction
  • Serious communication or understanding problems
  • Presence of serious cardiovascular, respiratory, metabolic or orthopedic problems
  • Presence of a secondary neurological disease

Treatment and study plan

Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire, Box and Block Test, Hand Lateralization Test.

Other

Imagery ability was determined.

Berg Balance Scale, Functional Reach Test

Other

Balance level was determined.

Timed Up and Go Test, Functional Independence Scale

Other

Functionality was evaluated.

Primary outcomes

  1. Fugl - Meyer Motor Recovery Assessment Form

    Time frame: Day 0

    It will only be evaluated in the stroke group. It is a scale that evaluates sensorimotor recovery after stroke. Each parameter was scored as 0 points: unsuccessful, 1 point: partially successful, 2 points: completely successful performance on the scale, which includes 50 items specific to stroke and based on performance. The maximum score that can be taken for the upper extremity in the scale where voluntary movement, reflex activity, grip, coordination and speed are evaluated is 66 and 34 for the lower extremity.

  2. Mini-Mental State Test

    Time frame: Day 0

    It was used to determine the cognitive state. The Mini-Mental State Test was first published by Folstein et al. It consists of eleven items under 5 main headings: orientation, record memory, attention and calculation, recall and language, and the total score is evaluated over 30 points. The ideal threshold value of the Mini-Mental State Test was found to be 24.

  3. Clock Drawing Test

    Time frame: Day 0

    It will be used to assess the phenomenon of neglect of the stroke individual. The individual is asked to draw a clock circle and insert the numbers of the clock into it. After finishing the numbers, the hands of the clock are placed to show 11 to 10 past.

  4. Digit Span Test

    Time frame: Day 0

    This test to evaluate the ability to sustain attention is a subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale--Revised battery. The test consists of two parts as forward and reverse range. In both parts, random numbers are read to the person at one second intervals, the numbers increase with each attempt and the person is asked to repeat in the same way. In both episodes, the number of digits of the previous sequence in which the person failed twice in a row constitutes the range. The maximum score that can be obtained for each section is 7, and a total of 14 points for the whole test.

  5. Kinesthetic and Visual Imaging Questionnaire

    Time frame: Day 0

    The Kinesthetic and Visual Imaging Questionnaire has been developed to evaluate the imagination ability in individuals with physical disabilities. The purpose of the questionnaire is to determine to what extent individuals visualize and feel the movements they imagine.

  6. Box and Block Test

    Time frame: Day 0

    It is a highly sensitive test for changes in upper extremity functional performance. However, this study will be used for evaluating mental chronometry ability rather than functional performance.

  7. Functional Independence Scale

    Time frame: Day 0

    It is a scale used to evaluate the motor and cognitive competence of patients in daily life activities. Scale; It consists of 18 items that evaluate six functions: self-care, sphincter control, transfer, displacement, communication, and social perception. Each item is scored between 1 (activity fully dependent) and 7 (activity fully independent) in proportion to the amount of assistance received. A minimum of 18 and a maximum of 126 points can be obtained. A low score means that the level of addiction has increased.

  8. Berg Balance Scale

    Time frame: Day 0

    It is a 14-item scale that evaluates the tasks used in daily life activities.Standing up without support, standing without support, sitting without support, standing up, transfers, standing with feet, standing with legs while standing, reaching out while standing, picking up from the ground, looking back, 360 degree rotation, firm side standing on the stool, one foot standstill and standstill functions are evaluated.Each item is planned between 0-4; 0 is unable to fulfill the task, 4 is to fulfill the task successfully. The total score of the test is between 0-56.0-20 points: wheelchair dependent, 21-40: assisted walking, 41-56: means independent ambulation.

  9. Time Up and Go Test

    Time frame: Day 0

    The test measures the speed during many functional maneuvers such as standing up, walking, turning, and sitting. In the test, the person is asked to stand up from the chair, walk 3 meters (10 feet) at a safe and normal pace, turn, walk back and sit on the chair, and the time is recorded in seconds. A short performance period indicates a good balance performance.

  10. Functional Reach Test

    Time frame: Day 0

    Subjects will asked to stand comfortably, to make a fist, and to raise their arm until it was parallel to the yardstick (position 1). The placement of the end of the third metacarpal along the yardstick will recorded. Subjects will then asked to reach as far forward as they could without losing their balance (position 2), and the position of the end of the third metacarpal along the yardstick will again recorded. No attempt will make to control the subject's method of reach, but if he will touch the wall or took a step during the maneuver, that trial will consider invalid and repeated.

  11. Hand Lateralization Test

    Time frame: Day 0

    It requires participants to question the laterality of the hand images presented and is commonly used to measure motor imagination ability in humans. It is used to evaluate implicit motor imagination ability. It is also a test that evaluates mental rotation, another dimension of imagination.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Medipol University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Is There a Relationship Between Imagination Ability, Balance and Functionality After Stroke?

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2021
First posted
Apr 5, 2021
Registry last updated
Dec 10, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.