Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03250156

Investigating Train the Trainer Delivery of Mindfulness-based Training

This project aims to evaluate the effectiveness of mindfulness training (MT) on cognitive and psychological factors when incorporated to the duty-day schedule of servicemembers (via proctored mindfulness practice). Based on prior literature, it can be hypothesized that the benefits of MT on measures of attention, working memory, and psychological well-being will be greater for servicemembers who engage in proctored mindfulness practice and receive duty-day support compared to servicemembers who practice independently, on their own time, with no structured duty day support.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Resilience Behavior Personal Satisfaction Psychological Well-Being Stress

Age range

18 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Background: Prior research on mindfulness training (MT) in military servicemembers showed that MT can effectively protect against degradation in attention and working memory over high-demand intervals. The benefits of MT in servicemembers were also linked to greater engagement in mindfulness practice. These prior MT programs delivered their training via a direct delivery approach, which involved a mindfulness training expert (TE) providing training to an end-user (e.g., military servicemembers). While successful, these programs are poorly suited for rapid, large-scale dissemination because these programs require direct training from a mindfulness training expert to an end-user and a considerable amount of time dedicated to training. To overcome these issues, the principal investigator together with a mindfulness expert developed a mindfulness training program contextualized for the U.S. Army, known as MBAT (Mindfulness-Based Attention Training), that is amenable to the train-the-train delivery approach and can provide rapid, large-scale dissemination to thousands of individuals. Specifically, Master Resilience Trainer - Performance Expert specialists (PEs), who have extensive experience working with soldiers but no mindfulness experience, were trained to deliver the MBAT course.

Problem: While training PEs to deliver MBAT complies with the U.S. Army time constraints, it remains unclear what is the best way to incorporate daily mindfulness practice into the duty schedule of servicemembers, which has a pivotal contribution to the protection against decline over high-demand intervals.

Project Goal: The aim of the present study is to investigate the impact of proctored vs. non-proctored practice of MBAT delivered by a PE to servicemembers. To investigate this issue, a trained PE will deliver MBAT to two groups of soldiers who will differ in the amount of duty-day support received to complete out-of-class mindfulness exercises. One group will be assigned proctored practice incorporated in the daily physical training (PT) and another group will be assigned non-proctored practice during which participants will perform the exercise independently, on their own.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • English-speaking
  • Active duty military
  • Able to understand and provide signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Non-controlled severe medical disease that might interfere with the performance of the study.
  • Any other condition the investigator might deem problematic for the inclusion of the volunteer in a trial of this nature will also be considered.

Treatment and study plan

MBAT with proctored practice

Behavioral

The training program is known as Mindfulness-Based Attention Training, or MBAT. The MBAT program is based on the principles of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction, but contextualized for military personnel using themes relevant to military life. The training content is comprised four central themes: concentration, body awareness, open monitoring, and compassion. Participants will have proctored practice and complete the assigned, out-of-class mindfulness exercises during the duty day as party of their physical training.

MBAT with non-proctored practice

Behavioral

The training program is known as Mindfulness-Based Attention Training, or MBAT. The MBAT program is based on the principles of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction, but contextualized for military personnel using themes relevant to military life. The training content is comprised four central themes: concentration, body awareness, open monitoring, and compassion.Participants will not have proctored practice and will complete the assigned, out-of-class mindfulness exercises on their own.

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Sustained Attention to Response Task (SART)

    Time frame: Participants will complete the SART at three time points: Pre-intervention baseline (T1), post-intervention up to 2 weeks after the end of the 4-week training (T2), and follow-up up to two months after the end of the training (T3).

    The SART is used to assess attentional performance and self-reported mind wandering (i.e., off-task thinking which is typically self-generated and compromises the performance of the task at hand). The task uses a continuous performance paradigm involving button presses to frequently presented non-targets (numbers 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9) but requires the participants to withhold their response to the infrequent target (number 3). Withholding responses only to infrequent targets encourages a pre-potent response and mind wandering. Real-time subjective experience of mind wandering during SART is assessed through experience-sampling probes randomly presented throughout the task.

  2. Change in Working Memory Task with Affective Distraction (WMDA)

    Time frame: Participants will complete the WMDA at three time points: Pre-intervention baseline (T1), post-intervention up to 2 weeks after the end of the 4-week training (T2), and follow-up up to two months after the end of the training (T3).

    The WMDA is used to assess the ability to hold information in working memory while overcoming emotional reactivity and distraction. Specifically, participants are presented with a memory item that they need to memorize and hold in memory during a delay interval. During the delay, emotionally negative or neutral scene images are presented. The negative images are combat scenes from Iraq or Afghanistan (Morey et al., 2009) and the neutral images are non-combat scenes.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS)

    Time frame: Pre-intervention baseline (T1), post-intervention up to 2 weeks after the end of the 4-week training (T2), and follow-up up to two months after the end of the training (T3).

    PANAS assesses positive and negative affect. It consists of a list of descriptors of positive (e.g., 'interested', 'enthusiastic') and negative (e.g., 'irritable', 'upset') affects. Items are rated on a 5-point scale (1 = very slightly or not at all, 5 = extremely), according to how participants feel. The Positive Affect scale reflects the extent to which a person feels enthusiastic, active, and alert; the Negative Affect scale reflects unpleasant mood states, such as anger, disgust, and fear.

  2. Change in Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)

    Time frame: Pre-intervention baseline (T1), post-intervention up to 2 weeks after the end of the 4-week training (T2), and follow-up up to two months after the end of the training (T3).

    PSS assesses the degree to which situations in one's life are viewed as stressful within the past month. Individual items assess feelings of stress, nervousness, irritation at life's hassles, and perceptions of one's own coping and control over a situation.

Other outcomes

  1. Change in Connor-Davidson Resilience Score (CD-RISC)

    Time frame: Pre-intervention baseline (T1), post-intervention up to 2 weeks after the end of the 4-week training (T2), and follow-up up to two months after the end of the training (T3).

    CD-RISC assesses an individual's tendency to cope with change and pressure in a productive way.

  2. Change in Five-Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (5FMQ)

    Time frame: Pre-intervention baseline (T1), post-intervention up to 2 weeks after the end of the 4-week training (T2), and follow-up up to two months after the end of the training (T3).

    5FMQ assesses five major measures of mindfulness, including non-judgment of experience, non-reactivity to inner experience, observing emotions, acting with awareness, and describing feelings in words.

  3. Change in Combat Experiences Scale (CES)

    Time frame: Pre-intervention baseline (T1), post-intervention up to 2 weeks after the end of the 4-week training (T2), and follow-up up to two months after the end of the training (T3).

    CES assesses combat experiences in the military context.

  4. Change in PTSD Checklist_Military (PCLM)

    Time frame: Pre-intervention baseline (T1), post-intervention up to 2 weeks after the end of the 4-week training (T2), and follow-up up to two months after the end of the training (T3).

    PCLM assesses the symptoms of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in military personnel

  5. Change in The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)

    Time frame: Pre-intervention baseline (T1), post-intervention up to 2 weeks after the end of the 4-week training (T2), and follow-up up to two months after the end of the training (T3).

    A self-rated questionnaire which assesses sleep quality and disturbances in seven "component" scores: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual PSQI assesses sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleeping medication, and daytime dysfunction.

  6. Change in Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI)

    Time frame: Pre-intervention baseline (T1), post-intervention up to 2 weeks after the end of the 4-week training (T2), and follow-up up to two months after the end of the training (T3).

    The empathic concern subscale of the IRI is a 7-item measure used to gauge feelings of empathy towards others.

  7. Change in Self-Compassion Scale (SCQ)

    Time frame: Pre-intervention baseline (T1), post-intervention up to 2 weeks after the end of the 4-week training (T2), and follow-up up to two months after the end of the training (T3).

    A 26-item measure used to measure aspects of self-compassion.

  8. Change in Obsessive Compulsion Index (OCI-R)

    Time frame: Pre-intervention baseline (T1), post-intervention up to 2 weeks after the end of the 4-week training (T2), and follow-up up to two months after the end of the training (T3).

    An 18-item scale used to assess symptoms of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.

  9. Change in Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)

    Time frame: Pre-intervention baseline (T1), post-intervention up to 2 weeks after the end of the 4-week training (T2), and follow-up up to two months after the end of the training (T3).

    This 20-item scale measures the major components of depressive symptomatology in the general population (i.e., nonpsychiatric persons older than 18).

  10. Change in Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Consumption (AUDIT-C)

    Time frame: Pre-intervention baseline (T1), post-intervention up to 2 weeks after the end of the 4-week training (T2), and follow-up up to two months after the end of the training (T3).

    An alcohol screen that identifies people who are hazardous drinkers or have active alcohol use disorders.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Miami

Other

Collaborators

  • Fort Drum
  • United States Department of Defense

Registry information

Official study title

Investigating Train the Trainer Delivery of Mindfulness-based Training- Ft. Drum Soldiers

Acronym: TTT

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2017
Study completion
2017
First posted
Aug 15, 2017
Registry last updated
Sep 18, 2018

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.