Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04883307

Investigating the Impact of Professional Development Coaching Programs in Residents & Fellows

The goal of the Professional Development Coaching Program is to allow trainees to understand their development over time, find meaning and purpose in their work, and identify their strengths and how to use these to overcome challenges and stressors. Additionally, the program connects trainees with a faculty member who will work with them, grow to know them in-depth over time, and provide meaningful guidance throughout the relationship. There is an additional benefit to the coaches themselves, who are able to connect with other faculty coaches in a rewarding way, that provides faculty development in leadership development and positive psychology, and space to interact with a group of like-minded physicians.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Massachusetts General Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States

About this study

A randomized controlled trial was performed to evaluate the effects of coaching on wellness, fulfillment and burnout through AWS from 2018-2020. The research protocol and all research materials and methods were reviewed and approved by the Mass General Brigham Institutional Review Board (Protocol #: 2017P00056) and funded through a grant provided by the Physicians Foundation.

AWS is a global, professional surgical society whose mission is to "to inspire, encourage, and enable women surgeons to realize their professional and personal goals."9 Concordant with its mission, the organization launched a formal coaching program in which practicing surgeons would volunteer to be trained in positive psychology coaching and paired with women surgical trainees for a remote coaching relationship.

Participants, randomization and outcome measures Members of AWS were recruited to participate in the study as coaches (attendings) or coachees (residents) via direct emails and social media. Attending surgeons were required to be women members of AWS, be in active surgical or surgical subspecialty practice and were required to reside in the United States (US) or Canada to be eligible to be a coach. Coachees were also women members of AWS, residents of the US and Canada, and were actively in residency training for the duration of the program.

All participants (coaches and coachees) were required to complete a baseline questionnaire including an informed consent item, demographic characteristics, Professional Fulfillment Index (PFI), Positive Emotion, Engagement, Relationship, Meaning, and Accomplishment scale (PERMA), Intolerance of Uncertainty scale (IUS), and Hardiness Resilience Score (HRS).10-13 Region was determined using self-reported cities and states as laid out in the US Census Divisions.14 Field of specialty or prospective specialty was also noted. The participating surgical residents were then randomized to the intervention group or the control group based on PFI's burnout sub-scale's quartile scores at pre-survey. After the 9-month study period, all participants received a follow up questionnaire similar to the baseline questionnaire. Those who completed the follow up questionnaire received a digital $10 gift card to an online shopping vendor as remuneration for study completion.

Intervention - The AWS Coaching Project Coaches who participated in the study completed a 3-hour in-person coaching training program at the 2018 and 2019 Association of Women Surgeons national meetings. Coaching materials were created by an author who is an expert in professional development coaching (K.P). in conjunction with the McLean Hospital Institute of Coaching. Training was interactive and led by Dr. Palamara and emphasized the basics principles of positive psychology and coaching. The coaches were supplied with a training manual with step by step guides for three coaching sessions with their coachees developed for this program (link to website). Each meeting was expected to be 45-60 minutes in length. In addition, coaches were also invited to participate in up to two additional optional 90-minute refresher training sessions which were offered virtually over a web-based video platform. Unique aspects of the curriculum tailored to the study population included discussion of imposter syndrome, the glass ceiling in surgery, and microaggressions. Additional details regarding the coaching training and program are published separately. 6,7 Upon completion of training, coaches were paired with 1-2 residents who were randomized to the coaching intervention group. Coach-coachee pairings were constructed based on divergent surgical specialty and geographic location to create a safe space and minimize the possibility of a more traditional mentoring relationship. All coaching sessions occurred remotely over voice or video calls. Participants were encouraged to meet for at least 3 coaching sessions over the 9-month intervention period but could meet more frequently if amenable to both parties.

Residents in the control group received three emails across the 9 month study period that contained materials related to physician well-being such as personal development and resilience, mindfulness, and work life-integration. Materials included recommended readings, videos, and exercises and were curated by members of the Association of Women Surgeons who were not involved in the coaching program.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Surgical resident in the US or Canada

Exclusion criteria

  • Surgical resident from other countries; non-surgical residents

Treatment and study plan

coaching

Behavioral

Professional development coaching based on a curriculum of positive psychology principles and coaching principles.

Wellness resources

Behavioral

Residents in the control group received three emails across the 9 month study period that contained materials related to physician well-being such as personal development and resilience, mindfulness, and work life-integration. Materials included recommended readings, videos, and exercises and were curated by members of the Association of Women Surgeons who were not involved in the coaching program.

Primary outcomes

  1. Professional Fulfillment Index

    Time frame: Change from Baseline PFI to End of Study PFI at 9 months

    Stanford PFI

  2. PERMA 15-item Self-scoring Instrument

    Time frame: Change from Baseline PERMA to End of Study PERMA at 9 months

    Positive Emotion, Engagement, Relationship, Meaning, and Accomplishment 15 item self-scoring scale (15-75); higher scores mean a better outcome

Secondary outcomes

  1. Intolerance of Uncertainty

    Time frame: Change from Baseline IUS to End of Study IUS at 9 months

    IUS 10; higher scores mean a worse outcome

  2. Hardiness Resilience Score

    Time frame: Change from Baseline HRS to End of Study HRS at 9 months

    Dispositional-resilience Scale-15; range from 0-80; higher scores mean a better outcome

  3. Gratitude Questionnaire Six Item Form (GQ-6)

    Time frame: Change from Baseline gratitude to End of Study gratitude at 9 months

    GQ6; Range 6-42; higher scores mean a better outcome

  4. Measurement of Current Status Part A

    Time frame: Change from Baseline coping to End of Study coping at 9 months

    MOCS Part A Questions 5-7; Range 0-12; higher scores mean a better outcome

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Massachusetts General Hospital

Other

Registry information

Official study title

A Randomized Trial to Investigate the Impact of Professional Development Coaching Programs in MGH Residency & Fellowship Programs, and in Women Residents in a Professional Surgical Society

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2020
Study completion
2020
First posted
May 12, 2021
Registry last updated
May 12, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.