Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06894810

Investigating the Efficacy of a Paediatric Fertility Preservation Decision Aid in Parents and Adolescents and Young Adults (CAYA) Cancer Survivors

The current standard of care for paediatric patients with cancer regarding preservation of their fertility (FP) is to provide high-quality information during the clinical consultation process. However, this approach depends on health provider knowledge and communication and has been shown to be sub-optimal in some situations. This impairs the critical decision-making of patients regarding fertility testing, utilization of gametes, and continuing payment of storage fees. The fertility preservation decision aid (FP DA) may lead to a greater understanding of their fertility status for participants. This knowledge may allow participants the opportunity to assess potential fertility issues prior to the end of their reproductive window, helping to minimize missed opportunities for parenthood.

This research study aims to assess the effectiveness of the use of the FP DA on unmet fertility information needs when it is provided in addition to high-quality information in parents of cancer survivors and CAYA cancer survivors compared to high-quality information alone.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

16 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Murdoch Children's Research Institute

Melbourne, Victoria, 3052, Australia

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Yasmin Jayasinghe

CONTACT

[email protected]

Yasmin Jayasinghe

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Zobaida Edib, MBBS, MPH, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+61 470 630 182

About this study

Medical advances over recent decades have increased the overall survival rates of children, adolescents and young adults diagnosed with cancer, with survival rates now exceeding 80%. The pressure points are not only at diagnosis - research has shown that cancer treatment can potentially affect fertility later in life. Survivorship is an important time for addressing the following issues: fertility status, reproductive monitoring, decisions about interval fertility preservation, ongoing tissue storage and utilization. Options to preserve fertility are possible. Decision Aids (DA) have been developed to provide patients and their families with the required information to make informed reproductive health decisions that align with their values. The prevalence of fertility information needs that are unmet remains high at around 40% amongst cancer survivors. Research evaluating the effectiveness of DAs in survivorship is lacking.

This is a parallel group double-blind randomised controlled trial for parents and Child Adolescent and Young Adults (CAYA) cancer survivors assessing the Fertility Preservation Decision Aid (FP DA) when provided in conjunction with high-quality information.

Eligible participants will be randomly allocated to either a control group receiving high-quality information or a treatment group that will receive the FP DA in addition to high-quality information. Participants will be blinded to their group allocation as they will be instructed to review information regarding fertility preservation without informing them of the type of information they are reviewing.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria

for both parents and survivors:

  • Be able to communicate in English.
  • Signed written informed consent form.

Inclusion criteria

for parents only:

  • Parents/guardians of CAYA survivors who were ≤25 years (2) when diagnosed with cancer and have completed curative gonadotoxic treatment

Inclusion criteria

for survivors only

  • CAYA cancer survivors aged 16 years or over who have completed curative gonadotoxic treatment.
  • Participants can be on long-term adjuvant or endocrine therapy.
  • Participants may have achieved a pregnancy or livebirth.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria

for both parents and survivors:

  • CAYA patients currently undergoing cancer treatment and their parents/guardians.
  • CAYA patients who are palliative and their parents/guardians
  • A family member already in the study.

Exclusion criteria

for survivors only:

  • Minors who are not deemed to be mature minors as per protocol

Treatment and study plan

Decision-aid

Other

Decision Aids (DA) are evidence-based clinical tools developed for patients to supplement clinicians' discussions and facilitate difficult preference-sensitive decisions. They are the gold standard approach (recommended by the Australian Commission of Safety and Quality in Healthcare) to facilitate complex healthcare decisions where there is more than one reasonable choice and where patients may value benefits and risks differently.

Primary outcomes

  1. Unmet information needs as measured by the Unmet Information Needs Scale within 8 weeks of randomisation

    Time frame: within 8 weeks from randomisation

    Unmet information needs will be measured within 8 weeks post-randomisation using the Unmet Information Needs Scale. Items included in the questionnaire are: knowledge regarding fertility status, future parenthood goals, and information regarding fertility preservation procedures carried out at either the treatment or survivorship period. Needs are assessed on a 6-point scale, ranging from 0 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater unmet information needs.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in unmet fertility information needs as measured by questionnaire at 6 months post-randomisation

    Time frame: 6 months post-randomisation

    Unmet fertility information needs will be measured at 6 months post-randomisation using the Unmet Information Needs Scale. Items included in the questionnaire are: knowledge regarding fertility status, future parenthood goals, and information regarding fertility preservation procedures carried out at either the treatment or survivorship period. Needs are assessed on a 6-point scale, ranging from 0 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater unmet information needs.

  2. Change in fertility knowledge as measured using a purposively designed knowledge scale within 8 weeks of randomisation and at 6 months post-randomisation

    Time frame: within 8 weeks of randomisation, 6 months after randomisation

    Changes in fertility knowledge will be measured using a purposively designed knowledge scale within 8 weeks of randomisation and at 6 months after randomisation. The knowledge scale that ranges from 0 to 6, with higher values indicated better knowledge.

  3. Change in decision making preparedness regarding fertility preservation measured by the Preparation for Decision Making Scale within 8 weeks of randomisation and at 6 months post-randomisation

    Time frame: within 8 weeks of randomisation, 6 months after randomisation

    Preparation for decision making will be measured by the utility of the information provided by participants using the Preparation for Decision Making Scale. The preparation for decision making scaling regarding fertility preservation comprises a 10 item scale with each answer scored 1 (not at all) to 5 (a great deal). The 10 items are summed and divided by 10. A higher score reflects greater preparation for decision making.

  4. Change in decisional conflict as measured by the a validated decisional conflict scale within 8 weeks of randomisation and at 6 months post-randomisation

    Time frame: within 8 weeks and 6 months after randomisation

    Decisional conflict is defined as uncertainty around the decision to see a health professional for further advice about sexual and reproductive health and uncertainty around choices available to achieve parenthood. This will be measured using a validated decisional conflict scale. Scores range from 0 [feels extremely supported in decision making] to 100 [feels extremely unsupported in decision making].

  5. Change in feasibility and acceptability of the information resources measured using a validated feasibility and acceptability scale within 8 weeks of randomisation and at 6 months post-randomisation

    Time frame: within 8 weeks of randomisation, 6 months after randomisation

    Feasibility and acceptability of using the information resources will be measured using a validated feasibility and acceptability scale. They are assessed on a 5-point scale, ranging from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater feasibility and acceptability.

  6. Change in Fertility Preservation Decision Aid (FP DA) usage analytic- bounce rate

    Time frame: within 8 weeks of randomisation, 6 months after randomisation

    FP DA usage analytic- bounce rate will be collected using a first-party analytics provider (Mixpanel).

  7. Change in Fertility Preservation Decision Aid (FP DA) usage analytic- average session duration

    Time frame: within 8 weeks of randomisation, 6 months after randomisation

    FP DA usage analytic- average session duration will be collected using a first-party analytics provider (Mixpanel).

  8. Change in Fertility Preservation Decision Aid (FP DA) usage analytic- average time on pages

    Time frame: within 8 weeks of randomisation, 6 months after randomisation

    FP DA usage analytic- average time on pages will be collected using a first-party analytics provider (Mixpanel).

  9. Change in Fertility Preservation Decision Aid (FP DA) usage analytic- pages view per visit

    Time frame: within 8 weeks of randomisation, 6 months after randomisation

    FP DA usage analytic- total number of pages view across the website per visit will be collected using a first-party analytics provider (Mixpanel).

  10. Change in Fertility Preservation Decision Aid (FP DA) usage analytic- user behavior flow

    Time frame: within 8 weeks of randomisation, 6 months after randomisation

    FP DA usage analytic- user behavior flow will be collected using a first-party analytics provider (Mixpanel).

  11. Change in Fertility Preservation Decision Aid (FP DA) usage analytic- exit rate

    Time frame: within 8 weeks of randomisation, 6 months after randomisation

    FP DA usage analytic- exit rate will be collected using a first-party analytics provider (Mixpanel).

  12. Change in Fertility Preservation Decision Aid (FP DA) usage analytic- returning users

    Time frame: within 8 weeks of randomisation, 6 months after randomisation

    FP DA usage analytic- returning users will be collected using a first-party analytics provider (Mixpanel).

  13. Change in Fertility Preservation Decision Aid (FP DA) usage analytic- heatmap

    Time frame: within 8 weeks of randomisation, 6 months after randomisation

    FP DA usage analytic- heatmap will be collected using a first-party analytics provider (Mixpanel).

  14. Change in Fertility Preservation Decision Aid (FP DA) usage analytic- individual page rating

    Time frame: within 8 weeks of randomisation, 6 months after randomisation

    FP DA usage analytic- individual page rating will be collected using a first-party analytics provider (Mixpanel).

  15. Change in Fertility Preservation Decision Aid (FP DA) usage analytic- the proportion of values clarification exercises completed

    Time frame: within 8 weeks of randomisation, 6 months after randomisation

    FP DA usage analytic- the proportion of values clarification exercises completed will be collected using a first-party analytics provider (Mixpanel).

  16. Change in Fertility Preservation Decision Aid (FP DA) usage analytic- the responses to the exercises

    Time frame: within 8 weeks of randomisation, 6 months after randomisation

    FP DA usage analytic- the responses to the exercises completed will be collected using a first-party analytics provider (Mixpanel).

Other outcomes

  1. Changes in perceived usefulness of the information resources measured by a 5-item Decision Aid development scale at the time of diagnosis

    Time frame: within 8 weeks of randomisation, 6 months after randomisation

    A five-point scale, ranging from 0 to 4, adapted from a Decision Aid (DA) development study will be used to assess the perceived usefulness of the information resources as a decision-making tool and whether it would have been helpful at the time of diagnosis. The higher scores will indicate greater perceived usefulness.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Diana Navarro-Perez, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+61 430 734 262

Yasmin Jayasinghe, FRANZCOG, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Murdoch Childrens Research Institute

Other

Collaborators

  • University of Melbourne

Registry information

Official study title

A Double Blind Randomised Controlled Trial of a Paediatric Fertility Preservation Decision Aid in Parents and Adolescents and Young Adults (CAYA) Cancer Survivors

Acronym: FOCUS

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Mar 25, 2025
Registry last updated
Dec 16, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.