Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02338089

Investigating the Effect of Pulsatile Administration of Oxytocin on the Desensitization of Human Myometrium In-vitro

Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is a leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality worldwide and is caused most commonly by poor uterine muscle (myometrium) tone after delivery. The first line agent used in the prevention and treatment of PPH is oxytocin.

Women who require augmentation of labor with intravenous oxytocin because of inadequate labor progression have been shown to be at increased risk of PPH. Typically, for augmentation of labor, oxytocin is used as a continuous infusion, with no consensus on the initial dose, its increments or maximal limit. High concentration continuous oxytocin infusions are not without theirs risks, which include hyperstimulation, fetal distress, as well as uterine rupture.

Studies have shown the clinical benefits of pulsatile oxytocin delivery for labor induction and augmentation with regards to requirement of less total oxytocin, similar uterine contractility and similar rates of caesarean delivery when used for labor induction and augmentation. However, the rate of PPH as a primary outcome measure has not been investigated. Therefore we currently do not know the effect of pulsatile oxytocin delivery on the rate of PPH.

The investigators hypothesize that the effect of myometrial desensitization following pulsatile oxytocin exposure would be lower when compared to continuous oxytocin exposure. These results will help in establishing whether myometrial contractility and sensitivity to oxytocin can be better preserved by delivery of pulsatile oxytocin, rather than continuous oxytocin for labor induction and augmentation, and thereby result in less PPH.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

16 year–40 year

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Mount Sinai Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, M5G1X5, Canada

About this study

Typically labor can be augmented by exposure to high levels of continuous oxytocin, for prolonged periods. The increased incidence of uterine atony and PPH following exogenous oxytocin administration during labor augmentation is related to myometrial oxytocin receptor desensitization to oxytocin.

Human clinical trials have shown the benefits of pulsatile oxytocin administration for labor induction and augmentation, which include requirement of less total oxytocin, similar uterine contractility and similar rates of cesarean delivery. However, the outcome of the effect on PPH is not currently known.

Characterization of the effect of pulsatile oxytocin on the desensitization of myometrium when compared to the effect of continuous oxytocin, may provide guidance for the delivery of pulsatile oxytocin for labor induction and augmentation to protect against the otherwise higher risk of PPH. Furthermore, the delivery of pulsatile oxytocin may be considered in subgroups who are already at higher risk of PPH, and require labor augmentation.

The investigators' previously validated in-vitro model provides a solid foundation for the study of myometrial contractility under controlled conditions, without any confounders that could be encountered in clinical settings.

The results of this study will provide insight into the level of desensitization of human myometrium following exposure to pulsatile oxytocin. Based on oxytocin dose-response curves after pretreatment to continuous oxytocin and pretreatment to pulsatile oxytocin, we will be able to determine the extent of desensitized myometrium following each delivery method.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients who give written consent to participate in this study
  • Patients with gestational age 37-41 weeks
  • Non-laboring patients, not exposed to exogenous oxytocin
  • Patients requiring primary Cesarean delivery or first repeat Cesarean delivery

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients who refuse to give written informed consent
  • Patients who require general anesthesia
  • Patients who had previous uterine surgery or more than one previous Cesarean delivery
  • Patients with any condition predisposing to uterine atony and postpartum hemorrhage, such as abnormal placentation, multiple gestation, preeclampsia, macrosomia, polyhydramnios, uterine fibroids, bleeding diathesis, chorioamnionitis, or a previous history of postpartum bleeding
  • Emergency Cesarean section in labor
  • Patients on medications that could affect myometrial contractility, such as nifedipine, labetolol or magnesium sulphate.

Treatment and study plan

Oxytocin

Drug

Oxytocin, 100 micromolar solution

Other names: pitocin

Primary outcomes

  1. Motility Index

    Time frame: 8 hours

    Motility index (MI) takes into account both the amplitude and frequency of the myometrial contraction. It is a calculated outcome, based on the formula: frequency/(10 x amplitude).

    The analysis is undertaken by attaching myometrial strips between an isometric force transducer and the base of an organ bath chamber.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Amplitude of contraction

    Time frame: 8 hours

    The maximum extent of uterine muscle contraction, measured in grams (g). The analysis is undertaken by attaching myometrial strips between an isometric force transducer and the base of an organ bath chamber.

  2. Frequency of contraction

    Time frame: 8 hours

    The number of contractions in uterine muscle (myometrium) over 10 minutes, spontaneously and in response to an agonist.

    The analysis is undertaken by attaching myometrial strips between an isometric force transducer and the base of an organ bath chamber.

  3. Integrated area under response curve (AUC)

    Time frame: 8 hours

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2015
Primary completion
2015
Study completion
2015
First posted
Jan 14, 2015
Registry last updated
Sep 4, 2015

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.