The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States
NCT Number: NCT05219487
This is an observational study to investigate the improvement of NMJ defects in adult patients with SMA following treatment with Risdiplam. Eligible patients will have received treatment with daily oral Risdiplam after receiving approval through their commercial insurance or drug assistance program. All subjects will be evaluated at one visit. Eligible subjects must have been receiving risdiplam for at least 12 months.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–70 year
All sexes
Observational
Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States
This is a proof of concept trial to investigate the impact of FDA approved therapy for adults with SMA on NMJ transmission. The study will enroll genetically confirmed adults with 5 q SMA treated with risdiplam for at least 12 months. Dosing will be weight- based as approved by the FDA (US Prescribing Information).
Assessments will include medical history, general physical and neurological examinations, vital signs, and the recording of adverse events. Diagnostic tests will include repetitive nerve stimulation (RNS), motor unit number estimation (MUNE), and decomposition EMG (dEMG). Further evaluations will utilize the Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale Expanded (HFMSE), the Revised Upper Limb Module (RULM), the modified SMA Functional Rating Scale (SMAFRS), and the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS). For ambulatory subjects, the assessment will include a six-minute walk test, while for non-ambulatory subjects, the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Adult/Adolescent Test of Neuromuscular Disorders (CHOP INTEND) will be performed. Handheld dynamometry will be used to measure strength in bilateral shoulder abduction, elbow flexion, elbow extension, hip flexion, hip abduction, hip adduction, knee flexion, and knee extension.
The study aims to investigate the impact of Risdiplam on neuromuscular junction (NMJ) function by assessing changes in the percent decrement of the compound muscle action potential amplitude, as measured through 3 Hz repetitive nerve stimulation (RNS) of the spinal accessory nerve. These results will be compared to historical controls. Additionally, the study will evaluate the differences in strength, motor function, and electrophysiological test scores between groups, which will be stratified based on a 10% decrement cutoff. Further analysis will explore the association between these measures and percent decrement among ambulatory and non-ambulatory patients.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Risdiplam is administered orally once daily and the recommended dosage is determined by age and body weight (see Table 1) [as outlined in the US Prescribing Information for EVRYSDI™(risdiplam)].
Table 1 Adult and Pediatric Dosing Regimen by Age and Body Weight: US Prescribing Information
Age and Body Weight (Recommended Daily Dosage): 2 months to less than 2 years of age (0.2 mg/kg); 2 years of age and older weighing less than 20 kg (0.25 mg/kg); 2 years of age and older weighing 20 kg or more (5 mg)
Other names: Evrysdi®
Time frame: Baseline
Change in the percent decrement of the compound muscle action potential amplitude assessed using 3 Hz repetitive nerve stimulation (RNS) of the spinal accessory nerve compared to historical controls.
If CMAP amplitude is absent at spinal accessory nerve, SMA, ulnar CMAP will be used to assess NMJ transmission.
Time frame: Baseline
The score difference between groups stratified using a 10% decrement cutoff
Time frame: Baseline
The score difference between groups stratified using a 10% decrement cutoff
Time frame: Baseline
The score difference between groups stratified using a 10% decrement cutoff (scale 0-40, higher score is better).
Time frame: Baseline
The score difference between groups stratified using a 10% decrement cutoff (scale 0-37, a higher score is better)
Time frame: Baseline
The score difference between groups stratified using a 10% decrement cutoff (0-66, a higher score is better
Time frame: Baseline
The score difference between groups stratified using a 10% decrement cutoff (9-63, the higher the score the higher the fatigue)
Time frame: Baseline
The score difference between groups stratified using a 10% decrement cutoff analyses (0-52, a higher score is better)
Time frame: Baseline
Strength measurements of of bilateral shoulder abduction, elbow flexion, elbow extension, hip flexion, hip abduction, hip adduction, knee flexion and knee extension. The score difference between groups stratified using a 10% decrement cutoff analyses.
Time frame: Baseline
The difference in amplitudes between groups stratified using a 10% decrement cutoff
Time frame: Baseline
Ulnar MUNE using modified multipoint technique. The difference in MUNE score between groups stratified using a 10% decrement cutoff
Bakri Elsheikh
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05341453
Central Nervous System Diseases, Motor Neuron Disease
Prague, Czechia
View Trial DetailsNCT07547189
Central Nervous System Diseases, Communication Disorders
Istanbul, Beykoz, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT05794139
Central Nervous System Diseases, Motor Neuron Disease
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03689660
Biofeedback, Central Nervous System Diseases
Izmir, Balcova, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details