Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Active, Not Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT05676320

Investigating Bone Cement With or Without Inossia® Cement Softener for Vertebral Compression Fractures

The overall purpose of conducting this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of V-Flex and V-Steady for augmentation of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures and to verify that adding a cement softener into a PMMA bone cement is comparable to a PMMA bone cement alone (V-Steady).

Active, Not Recruiting

This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Beam Radiology, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Loading trial locations.

About this study

The clinical investigation is a prospective, single-blind, controlled multi-center study of vertebral compression fractures treated by vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty with PMMA alone (V-Steady) or PMMA mixed with Inossia® Cement Softener (V-Flex).

The overall purpose of conducting this study is to confirm the safety and efficacy of Inossia® Cement Softener mixed with PMMA for augmentation of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures and to verify that the V-Flex is, at least, comparable (non-inferior) to the PMMA products used today.

All eligible patients will be invited to participate in the study. A total of 203 patients were enrolled in the study.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Informed consent obtained before any study-related activities (study-related activities are any procedures that would not have been performed during normal management of the patient, i.e. standard of care);
  • Symptomatic osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture without prior or not responding to medical treatment within 6 months;
  • Maximum of 1 level of vertebral compression fractures eligible for treatment localized at level Th5 to L5 and verified by MRI or bone scan;
  • Height reduction of the affected vertebra(e) with an anterior wall compression of not exceeding 60% compared to the nearest normal vertebral body determined by X-ray;
  • Have pain correlating to the fractured levels requiring regular analgesic intake and/or causing substantial disability of daily life;
  • Pain score ≥ 40 mm measured by VAS correlating to at least one of the fracture levels (scale 0 - 100 mm) at the screening visit;
  • Oswestry Disability Index > 20 (0 - 100 scale);
  • SF-12PCS Index < 80 (0 - 100 scale);
  • Patient with a communicative ability to understand the procedure and participate in the study and comply with the follow up program.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients below 18 years;
  • Any burst fracture;
  • Unstable fractures defined by neurological deficit or interspinous process widening as evaluated by the Investigator, as well as kyphosis > 30°, translation > 4 mm;
  • Established or suspected malignancy of the fractured vertebra. Hemangioma of the fractured vertebra;
  • High energy trauma or clinical diagnosis of herniated nucleus pulposus or severe spinal stenosis as suggested by progressive weakness;
  • Have neurologic symptoms or deficits, or radiculopathy related to the fractured vertebrae;
  • Patients with extremely high BMI, i.e. BMI ≥ 40;
  • Previously treated with vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty;
  • Patients with concomitant diseases which may be worsened by invasive treatment of the fracture such as e.g. severe cardiopulmonary dysfunction (including aortic aneurysm), as judged by the Investigator
  • Irreversible coagulopathy or bleeding disorder. Note regarding reversible coagulopathies: Patients on Coumadin or other anticoagulants may participate. Investigators should follow routine practices for perioperative discontinuation and re- initiation of anticoagulants;
  • Active systemic infection or local skin infection at the puncture site;
  • Pregnancy or breast-feeding;
  • Patients with known chemical dependency or drugs or with a medical history of drug abuse;
  • Patients who are serving prison sentence;
  • Have participated in another investigational study within 30 days prior to inclusion
  • Pacemaker
  • Previous or active radiotherapy affecting the spine

Treatment and study plan

V-Flex

Device

Bone cement including Inossia® Cement Softener. Treatment for vertebral compression fracture

V-Steady

Device

Bone Cement alone

Primary outcomes

  1. New fractures

    Time frame: 1 year

    To assess the effectiveness after administration of V-Flex compared to V-Steady as measured by reduction of new radiologically confirmed fractures.

  2. Location of fractures

    Time frame: 1 year

    Assess the location of new fractures: adjacent or non-adjacent to the treated vertebral or re-fractures of the treated vertebra after administration of the investigational device compared to PMMA.

  3. Timing of fractures

    Time frame: 1 year

    Assess the timing of adjacent, non-adjacent and re-fractures of the treated vertebra after administration of the investigational device compared to PMMA.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Function by ODI

    Time frame: 24 months

    Assess the change in function at time points 5 days, 3 months, 12 months, and 24 months after administration of the investigational device compared to PMMA as measured by Oswestry Disability Index (ODI): scale 0-100% where a higher score means a worse outcome

  2. Pain measured by VAS

    Time frame: 24 months

    Assess the change in back pain at time points 5 days, 3 months, 12 months, and 24 months after administration of the investigational device compared to PMMA as measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS): scale 0-100, where 0 is no pain and 100 is the worst pain imaginable

  3. Health related quality of life by SF-12

    Time frame: 24 months

    Assess the change in health related quality of life at time points 5 days, 3 months, 12 months, and 24 months after administration of the investigational device compared to PMMA as measured by SF-12: scale 0-100 where a higher score means a better outcome

  4. Safety measured by adverse events

    Time frame: 24 months

    Asses the safety of Inossia™ Cement Softener as measured by adverse events

  5. Hospital Beds

    Time frame: 1 week

    Record the number of hospital bed days (within hospital, nursing home, etc.) during the first week

  6. The vertebral height

    Time frame: 24 month

    The vertebral height at 12 months and 24 months compared to baseline by X-ray (Average Mid Vertebral Body Height)

  7. Analgesic use

    Time frame: 24 months

    Record the analgesic use at time points 5 days, 3 months, 12 months, and 24 months after administration of the investigational device compared to PMMA and compare to the WHO analgestic ladder

  8. Osteoporotic treatment regimen checklist

    Time frame: 24 months

    Record the osteoporotic treatment regimen at time points 5 days, 3 months, 12 months, and 24 months after administration of the investigational device compared to PMMA

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Inossia AB

Industry

Collaborators

  • EIT Health
  • Uppsala University

Registry information

Official study title

A Multicentre, Single-blind, RCT to Document the Safety and Efficacy of the Use of a Bone Cement With or Without Inossia® Cement Softener for Patients With Vertebral Compression Fractures

Acronym: SOFTBONE

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2026
First posted
Jan 9, 2023
Registry last updated
Apr 8, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.