Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02804451

Intubation During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

The aim of the study was to compare the intubation time and effectiveness, the grade of larynx visibility, and the ease of intubation in adults performed by nurses using 4 devices: a Macintosh blade laryngoscope (MAC), and a TruView EVO2 (EVO2), TruView EVO2 PCD (PCD), and ETView SL (ETView) laryngoscope, in simulated CPR settings with and without CC.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Medical University of Warsaw, Department of Emergency Medicine

Warsaw, Masovia, 02-005, Poland

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • had not received any training in endotracheal intubation with videolaryngoscopy before the study,
  • had nursing specialization in anaesthesiology or emergency medicine,
  • presented with no wrist or low back diseases or pregnancy.

Exclusion criteria

  • not meet the above criteria.

Treatment and study plan

Macintosh laryngoscope

Device

intubation with standard macintosh larygoscope; gold standard

Other names: MAC

Truview EVO2 laryngoscope

Device

A TruView EVO2 laryngoscope with blade size 3 (EVO2; Truphatek Holdings, Ltd., Netanya, Israel),

Other names: EVO2

TruView EVO2 PCD laryngoscope

Device

A TruView EVO2 PCD laryngoscope with blade size 3 (PCD; Truphatek Interbational Ltd., Netanya, Israel),

Other names: PCD

ETView SL

Device

An ETView SL (ETView; ETViewLtd, Misgav, Israel) ednotracheal tube

Other names: ETView

Primary outcomes

  1. time to the first ventilation attempt

    Time frame: 1 day

Secondary outcomes

  1. time to visualize the larynx

    Time frame: 1 day

  2. time to introduce the endotracheal tube through the vocal cords

    Time frame: 1 day

  3. success rate

    Time frame: 1 day

    first intubation attempt success rate

  4. degree of larynx visibility

    Time frame: 1 day

    analysed based on a Cormack-Lehane scale

  5. ease of intubation technique

    Time frame: 1 day

    10-point visual analogue scale (VAS) was used, where 1 indicated an extremely simple procedure, while 10 - an extremely difficult one

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Medical University of Warsaw

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2015
Primary completion
2016
Study completion
2016
First posted
Jun 17, 2016
Registry last updated
Jun 17, 2016

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.