NCT Number: NCT03254303
Intravenous Cannulation In Children During Sevoflurane Induction
This interventional simple-blind,randomized trial has included 90 children of American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) physical status I or II aged between 1 to 12 years of either sex, scheduled for for outpatient minor surgery under general anesthesia. This study examined whether one should make iv attempts during the early induction period (at 60 seconds) or lately (90 or 120 s) and waiting until the child receives additional sevoflurane inhalation anesthesia.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeKey information
Conditions
Age range
1 year–12 year
Sex eligibility
All sexes
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Not applicable
About this study
We conducted a prospective randomized study, after obtaining Institutional review board approval, which didn't require written parental consent. Children age 1-12 years, undergoing elective general anesthesia via an inhalation induction were randomized to one of three groups of 30 patients each one, for iv placement, either 60s (group E), 90 or 120 s (group L) following loss of lid reflex. Movement on iv placement and incidence of laryngospasm were determined. Difficulty with iv placement was also recorded. Statistical analysis included contingency testing, ANOVA, and non parametric testing. A P-value <0.05 was considered significant.
Who can participate
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
- children with American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) physical status I or II
- age between 1 and 12 years of either sex,
- were scheduled for outpatient minor surgery under general anesthesia
Exclusion criteria
- age <1 and >12 years
- patients with full stomach
- a history of gastric reflux
- history of convulsions, cardiovascular or neuromuscular disease
- suspected difficult airway and hyper-reactive airway disease
Treatment and study plan
Difficulty of catheterization in group 90 s
OtherDifficulty of catheterization in group 120 s
OtherPrimary outcomes
-
Success of intravenous insertion
Time frame: from the end of study period of time after the loss of eyelash reflex to successful cannulation less than 30 seconds
success insertion of intravenous cannula was achieved at the first attempt less than 30 seconds
Secondary outcomes
-
limb movement
Time frame: from the end of study period of time after the loss of eyelash reflex to successful cannulation less than 30 seconds
The movement was classified using the scale:
(0 No movement, 1 movement) The incidence of laryngospasm was defined as the sudden complete or partial loss of air exchange with concurrent loss of a capnographic wave.
The movement was classified using the scale:
(0 No movement, 1 movement) The incidence of laryngospasm was defined as the sudden complete or partial loss of air exchange with concurrent loss of a capnographic wave.
- The movement was classified using the scale: (0 No movement, 1 movement)
- The movement was classified using the scale: (0 No movement, 1 movement) The limb movement was classified using the scale:0 No movement, 1 movement)
Other outcomes
-
laryngospasm
Time frame: from the end of study period of time after the loss of eyelash reflex to successful cannulation less than 30 seconds
laryngospasm was defined as the sudden complete or partial loss of air exchange with concurrent loss of a capnographic wave.
Sponsors and collaborators
Lead sponsor
Leila mansali stambouli
Other
Registry information
Official study title
Intravenous Cannulation In Children During Sevoflurane Induction: Which Time is Adequate
Important dates
- Study start
- 2016
- Primary completion
- 2016
- Study completion
- 2016
- First posted
- Aug 18, 2017
- Registry last updated
- Aug 18, 2017
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Related clinical trials
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
Failure of First-attempt Insertion and Analysis of Practices Related to Peripheral Intravenous Catheters in the Emergency Department:
NCT06851585
Catheterization, Catheterization, Peripheral
Poitiers, France
View Trial DetailsClinical Performance of a Chlorhexidine Antimicrobial Dressing
NCT00516906
Catheterization
View Trial DetailsCryospray to Reduce Pain During Venous Cannulation
NCT04865783
Anesthetics, Intravenous, Catheterization
Aabenraa, Denmark
View Trial DetailsThe Effect of Using Smart Glasses Integrated Ultrasonography on Radial Artery Catheterization
NCT06271499
Cannulation, Catheterization
Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details