Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02296515

Intrathecal Pump Refill Undergoing Regular Intrathecal Pump Refill

Reservoir fill port identification by palpation versus ultrasound,a mono-centre prospective comparison study in patients undergoing regular intrathecal pump refill

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Centro del Dolore, Neurocentro, Opedale Regionale di Lugano

Lugano, Canton Ticino, 6900, Switzerland

About this study

Intrathecal drug therapy with implantable intrathecal pumps is being utilized increasingly for the treatment of chronic refractory pain and spasticity. However, performing the regular refill procedures of the pumps with the commonly performed "blind" technique caries the potential risk of medication injection into the subcutaneous tissue, which can lead to an overdose.

Objective: The primary purpose of this study is to assess the accuracy of the ultrasound-guided technique for the refill procedure compared to the blind technique in subjects undergoing regular refills of their intrathecal pumps for the treatment of chronic non-malignant pain or spasticity.

Study design: Mono-center prospective efficacy and reliability study comparing two approaches to enter the fill port. Study population: The investigators will include patients with an intrathecal pump for the treatment of chronic non-malignant pain or spasticity, undergoing regular refills of their intrathecal pumps at our Centro Terapia del Dolore at the Ospedale Italiano a Viganello(EOC, Switzerland). Intervention: Two different experienced clinicians will perform one time the blind technique and two times the ultrasound-guided technique on all patients.sample size calculations can be performed. The sample size i.e. n=25 patients in NSI-TD-001 Protocol v. 1.0 Final: August 4th, 2014 Confidential Page 31 of 40 total assessed 6 six times is therefore based on practical grounds related feasibility to duration of inclusion (i.e. one year). This would imply 50 paired assessments for both fill port accuracy assessment and intra-rater reliability. The investigators believe based on clinical experience that this number would suffice to detect a difference between methods. Likewise, although no formal power calculation are available for ICC based reliability assessment, as a rule of thumb 50 paired assessments are usually considered adequate to evaluate intra-rater liability.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • 18 years or older at the time of enrollment;
  • The patients are treated for chronic non-malignant pain or spasticity with an intrathecal
  • programmable infusion pump and undergo regular refills of their pumps in our clinic.
  • Able to provide adequate given written, informed consent to participate in this study.

Exclusion criteria

  • patient refusal to participate or provide informed consent standard exclusions; pregnancy, lactation, treatment with other investigational products.
  • other clinically significant concomitant disease states (e.g., renal failure, hepatic dysfunction,
  • cardiovascular disease).
  • infection at the puncture site -participation in another study.-

Treatment and study plan

Intrathecal pump refill:

Procedure

Two different experienced clinicians will perform one time the blind technique andTwo different experienced clinicians will perform one time the blind technique andtwo times the ultrasound-guided technique on all patients.

Primary outcomes

  1. The primary endpoint will be the number of attempts to enter the reservoir fill port.

    Time frame: 1 YearThe sample size i.e. n=25 patients in total

    The time to perform refill, and patient comfort associated with both procedures will be registered in order to assess user friendliness of both procedures.

Secondary outcomes

  1. the number of skin puncturs

    Time frame: 1 YearYearThe sample size i.e. n=25 patients in total

  2. reliability of the US guided procedure

    Time frame: 1 YearYearThe sample size i.e. n=25 patients

  3. - time to perform refill (usability)

    Time frame: 1 YearYearThe sample size i.e. n=25 patients

  4. patient discomfort

    Time frame: 1 YearYearThe sample size i.e. n=25 patients

  5. - determine if BMI has an impact on the accuracy (the number of attempts) of the two techniques

    Time frame: 1 YearYearThe sample size i.e. n=25 patients

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Dr med. Paolo Maino Viceprimario Anestesiologia

Other

Collaborators

  • VU University of Amsterdam

Registry information

Official study title

Intrathecal Pump Refill: Reservoir Fill Port Identification by Palpation Versus Ultrasound,a Mono-centre Prospective Comparison Study in Patients Undergoing Regular Intrathecal Pump Refill

Important dates

Study start
2014
Primary completion
2017
Study completion
2017
First posted
Nov 20, 2014
Registry last updated
Jan 3, 2018

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.