Helwan University
Helwan, Cairo Governorate, Egypt
NCT Number: NCT06050044
The aim of this study is to compare the effects of intrathecal injection of hyperbaric bupivacaine versus injection of hyperbaric and isobaric bupivacaine in patients undergoing lower abdominal surgery.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Helwan, Cairo Governorate, Egypt
Spinal anesthesia is one of the most commonly used nerve block procedures for surgical operations involving the lower abdomen, the perineum, and the lower limbs, owing to its quick effect and cost-effectiveness. Spinal anesthesia is advantageous in that it uses a small dose of anesthesia, is simple to perform, and offers a rapid onset of action, reliable surgical analgesia, and good muscle relaxation.
The Baricity of a solution is defined as the ratio of the density of the solution to that of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). The most common anesthetic used for SA in obstetric and non-obstetric surgery is bupivacaine, which can be formulated as an isobaric or hyperbaric solution. Baricity differences between spinal anesthetic solutions are thought to affect hemodynamic parameters and distribution within the subarachnoid space, which may, in turn, affect the onset, extent, and duration of sensory block as well as side effects.
Spinal anesthesia has been linked to different adverse effects, out of which hypotension is most common complication. The incidence of hypotension is 25-75% in general population. Factors that increase the risk of hypotension include patient factors (advanced age, pregnancy, obesity, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and anemia) and technical factors such as a block level at or above T5, use of opioids during premedication, and high local anesthetic dosages.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Patients were injected intrathecally with 20 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% solution
Patients received 10 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine and 10 mg isobaric bupivacaine 0,5 % solution
Time frame: 3 hours post-injection
Blood pressure was recorded using standard non-invasive monitors at 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 45, and 60 min, then hourly until 3 h post-injection.
Hypotension was defined as a decrease in mean arterial pressure of more than 30% from baseline.
Time frame: 3 hours post-injection
Heart rate was recorded using standard non-invasive monitors at 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 45, and 60 min, then hourly until 3 h post-injection.
Time frame: 3 hours post-injection
Mean arterial pressure was recorded using standard non-invasive monitors at 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 45, and 60 min, then hourly until 3 h post-injection.
Helwan University
Other
Intrathecal Injection of Hyperbaric Bupivacaine Versus a Mixture of Hyperbaric and Isobaric Bupivacaine in Patients Undergoing Lower Abdominal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07718360
Cesarean Section Pain, Neurologic Manifestations
Islamabad, Federal Capital Territory, Pakistan
View Trial DetailsNCT06711601
Intercristal Line, Posterior Superior Iliac Spine
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
View Trial DetailsNCT07676955
Cesarean Birth, Sedation
Istanbul, Sultangazi, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06745986
Fascia Iliaca Compartmental Block, Femoral Thrombectomy
Port Said, Port Said Governorate, Egypt
View Trial Details