Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06542315

Intraoperative Parathyroid Hormone Monitoring to Guide Surgery in Renal hyperparathyroIdism

The goal of this pilot clinical is to determine the feasibility of a fully powered clinical trial to determine the effectiveness of intraoperative parathyroid hormone (IOPTH) criteria in guiding surgery for secondary and tertiary hyperparathyroidism. The main question it aims to answer is:

Is a fully powered trial investigating the role for IOPTH criteria in secondary and tertiary hyperparathyroidism feasible?

The comparison group is surgery not guided by IOPTH.

Participants will be randomized to undergo parathyroid surgery with one of four IOPTH criteria or a control arm that does not use IOPTH. All recruited patients are asked to complete quality of life and cognitive questionnaires, in addition to bloodwork during the study period.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

About this study

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is increasing in prevalence globally alongside rising rates of obesity and metabolic syndromes. The rates of secondary and tertiary hyperparathyroidism are expected to rise alongside the increasing prevalence of CKD. Secondary hyperparathyroidism is diagnosed in up to 80% of patients with long-standing CKD on hemodialysis and is associated worse renal and cardiovascular outcomes and quality of life. Up to 55% of patients are non-compliant with, or refractory to, medical treatment and therefore require definitive surgery. Up to 22% of patients who undergo renal transplantation also develop tertiary hyperparathyroidism, which is associated with worse patient morbidity and renal graft outcomes. Surgery to extirpate abnormal parathyroid tissue in both diagnoses is technically challenging with surgical failure rates as high as 30%. Intraoperative parathyroid hormone (IOPTH) monitoring, which is a surgical adjunct that uses the short half-life of PTH to guide parathyroid surgery, is standard-of-care in primary hyperparathyroidism. There is no consensus nor standardization in the use of IOPTH monitoring in secondary and tertiary hyperparathyroidism. The investigators propose a multi-centre, multi-arm randomized trial to identify the most effective IOPTH monitoring criteria in improving surgical outcomes in secondary and tertiary hyperparathyroidism.

To evaluate the feasibility of a fully powered trial, the investigators will conduct a randomized and blinded multi-centre, multi-arm pilot trial. The investigators plan on evaluating five allocation arms that use four IOPTH monitoring criteria (i.e., 10 minutes, 15 minutes, 20 minutes, and 25 minutes) against a control arm of not using IOPTH monitoring. The primary feasibility outcome is randomization rate. The investigators will aim for a targeted randomization rate of 70% (95% CI: 55%-82%). Secondary feasibility outcomes include group cross-over rate, blinding effectiveness, patient compliance, and pilot trial costs. The primary efficacy outcome is recurrent hyperparathyroidism, which is evaluated at six months. Secondary efficacy outcomes will include operating room time, renal graft outcomes, renal function, cardiovascular outcomes, hospital admission and rate of re-admission, quality of life, cognitive performance. Inclusion criteria will include any adult patients (>= 18 years old) diagnosed with secondary or tertiary hyperparathyroidism who are candidates for parathyroid surgery.

The investigators plan to recruit 60 patients (12 per arm) to evaluate a randomization goal of 70% (95% CI: 55%-82%) while accounting for a 20% attrition rate. The investigators will perform descriptive analyses with ITT principles to evaluate feasibility and use these findings to evaluate the practicality of a fully powered trial. The investigators will perform descriptive analyses for all outcomes with 95% confidence intervals. The investigators will use the stop light model for determining whether a final trial is feasible, whereby a randomization rate equal to or greater than 70% will suggest that such a trial is feasible.

The results of a fully powered trial will standardize and identify the role for IOPTH monitoring in optimizing surgical outcomes for secondary and tertiary hyperparathyroidism.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • 18 years of age or older
  • Candidate for subtotal parathyroidectomy or total thyroidectomy with or without autotransplantation
  • Tertiary hyperparathyroidism and/or recurrent hyperparathyroidism OR secondary hyperparathyroidism diagnosed with any stage of chronic kidney disease

Exclusion criteria

  • Undergoing parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women
  • Undergoing revision parathyroidectomy
  • Undergoing minimally invasive or video-assisted parathyroidectomy
  • Unable to provide written consent to be participant in study
  • Unable to complete study follow-up visits

Treatment and study plan

Intraoperative parathyroid hormone (IOPTH) monitoring

Procedure

Intraoperative parathyroid hormone (IOPTH) monitoring, which is a surgical adjunct that permits PTH bloodwork to be drawn during parathyroid surgery to monitor and guide surgical outcomes.

Primary outcomes

  1. Randomization rate

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end the trial at 6 months

    Defined as the number of patients agreeing to participate in the trial and being randomized to any of the allocation groups, divided by the number of eligible patients. We will review this data every two weeks during the pilot trial. A randomization percentage of 70% or greater will support the feasibility of a fully powered RCT. We will utilize the traffic light system introduced by Avery and colleagues, whereby if randomization of 70% or greater is achieved, we will proceed with fully powered trial. If a randomization rate of 50-69% is achieved, we will consider proceeding with modifications to the fully powered trial. If randomization rate is <50%, we will not proceed with fully powered trial. We selected this as a primary feasibility outcome because we are sampling from a relatively rare population, and so gathering an accurate estimate of randomization rate will allow us to determine the ideal number of participating sites for the final trial.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Blinding effectiveness

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end the trial at 6 months

    The Bang Blindness Inventory (BBI) will be administered to patients, outcome assessors, and statisticians at the end of study follow-up and the time of trial completion (for statisticians). The BBI will then be calculated for each of these blinded parties and reported on a scale of -1 (unblinding) to 0 (perfect blinding) to +1 (lack of blinding).

  2. Surgeon compliance and crossover

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end the trial at 6 months

    Surgeon compliance and crossover: The number of patients who undergo surgery with a different IOPTH monitoring criteria from which they were randomized. All surgeons will complete a postoperative de-brief form that will capture their rationale for changing groups. We will consider any percentage of group crossover to hinder consideration of a fully powered trial and based on the direction and number of groups crossovers. If any crossovers are detected, then we will consider to the number and organization of allocation arms for the fully powered trial.

  3. Follow-up completion

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end the trial at 6 months

    Defined as completion of all questionnaires and study bloodwork from randomization to final study follow-up.

  4. Trial costs

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end the trial at 6 months

    We will estimate the study and hospital costs required for this multi-centre initiative for each recruited patient during the study period. This will provide an estimate of the costs for performing the fully powered trial.

Other outcomes

  1. Surgeon-dictated changes to intraoperative plan

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end the trial at 6 months

    Any changes to the surgical plan will be documented by surgeons in a postoperative de-brief form.

  2. Operating time

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end the trial at 6 months

    The length of the surgery from skin incision to skin closure, as measured in minutes

  3. Revision surgery rate and indication for revision surgery

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end the trial at 6 months

    Number of patients who either undergo or are consented and scheduled to undergo revision parathyroidectomy within 6 months of randomization. This will be measured as a dichotomous outcome. We will also evaluate the surgical indication for revision surgery. This will be measured as a categorical outcome.

  4. Chronic kidney disease progression, cardiovascular death, or renal death (composite outcome)

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end the trial at 6 months

    Number of patients who meet the criteria of this composite outcome (sustained decline in eGFR of at least 50%, end-stage kidney disease, or kidney-related or cardiovascular death).

  5. Recurrent and/or persistent hyperparathyroidism rates

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end the trial at 6 months

    Number of people who continue to have pathologically elevated PTH levels within 3 months of randomization. This will be measured with reference to the defined PTH reference threshold at each participating institution. This will be measured immediately after surgery and at one month and six months from randomization. We will also measure the number of patients who have laboratory hypercalcemia as defined by bloodwork immediately after surgery and at one month and six months from randomization.

  6. IOPTH kinetics in secondary and tertiary hyperparathyroidism

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end the trial at 6 months

    The IOPTH change (as a percent) between time points will be described.

  7. Emergency room visits and hospital readmission rates

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end the trial at 6 months

    Number of emergency room visits and hospital readmissions due to surgical complications.

  8. Length of hospital stay

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end the trial at 6 months

    Number of days admitted to hospital from the date of surgery to the day of hospital discharge. We will also measure the length of hospital stay for any readmissions from hospital admission to discharge.

  9. Health-related quality of life

    Time frame: From enrollment to 3 months

    These will be measured using the SF-36 tool and kidney disease quality of life (KDQOL)-36 tool prior to randomization (baseline), and at one month and three months from surgery. The SF-36 is a validated self-reported patient-centred outcome measure (PROM) measured via eight domains on a 0-100 scale with lower scores indicating worse disability. The KDQOL-36 is a validated self-reported PROM scored from 0-100 with higher scores indicating better quality of life.

  10. Renal graft failure and renal graft complication rates

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end the trial at 6 months

    Number of patients who have renal transplantation who experienced renal graft failure and/or complication during the study period.

  11. Rates of hypoparathyroidism and hypocalcemia

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end the trial at 6 months

    These will be measured by calculating the number of patients who develop hypoparathyroidism and/or hypocalcemia following surgery.

  12. Surgery-specific complication rates

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end the trial at 6 months

    The types of surgical complications will be documented.

  13. Fully powered trial costs

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end the trial at 6 months

    This will be collected during the study period. It will include operative and inpatient/outpatient costs for each randomized patient.

  14. Cognitive function

    Time frame: From enrollment to 3 months

    These will be measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and MoCA prior to randomization (baseline), and at one month and three months postoperatively. In the HADS, higher scores indicate worse anxiety and depression scores with scores ranging from 0-21. In the MoCA, lower scores indicate worse cognitive function with scores ranging from 0-30.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Phillip Staibano, MD, MSc

CONTACT

[email protected]

905-929-1992

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

McMaster University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Intraoperative Parathyroid Hormone Monitoring to Guide Surgery in Renal hyperparathyroIdism: A Pilot Trial

Acronym: PEREGRINE

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Aug 7, 2024
Registry last updated
Aug 7, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.