Seoul St. Mary's hospital
Seoul, 137-070, South Korea
NCT Number: NCT01175902
To prove the non-inferiority of the fixed timolol-dorzolamide combination (Cosopt) compared to 0.005% latanoprost (Xalatan) in the aspects of intraocular pressure (IOP) and ocular perfusion pressure (OPP) in subjects with normal tension glaucoma (NTG)
Clinical hypotheses. Primary hypothesis
* Cosopt group is non-inferior to Xalatan group in diurnal IOP reduction.
Secondary hypothesis
* Cosopt group is non-inferior to Xalatan group in diurnal diastolic and systolic OPP.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me45 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Seoul, 137-070, South Korea
Cosopt (dorzolamide/timolol fixed combination) has well known effect for IOP reduction in POAG and OHT.3-5 However, there is no study about the effect and safety of Cosopt in NTG, Cosopt is not used the first line drug in the management of NTG.
In Korea, the prevalence of NTG is higher than western countries, the majority (about 80-90%) of open angle glaucoma patients have an IOP of 21 mmHg or less, so the study of NTG is important and searching of effective drug for the treatment of NTG is necessary.
In this study, we would prove the non-inferiority of Cosopt compared to Xalatan,6 which is used as a first line drug in the management of NTG, in the aspects of IOP and OPP including diastolic OPP (DOPP).
A prospective, interventional, randomized, crossover, single masked, single center study. Forty-four NTG patients were randomly allocated to one of two groups. Patients in group A were treated with Cosopt, lubricant, and Xalatan for 4 weeks each, whereas patients in group B were treated with Xalatan, lubricant, and Cosopt for 4 weeks each.
Recruit NTG patients, who are not treated with the glaucoma medication recent 2 months. If treated, after washout period of 4 weeks, the patients can be included in the study. Baseline IOP, systolic and diastolic BP will be measured. (Day 1) After 4 weeks of treatment of Cosopt or Xalatan, all participants will be checked diurnal IOP, systolic and diastolic BP. IOP was measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry (mean of three consecutive readings) with the patient in a sitting position at the slit lamp. Every IOP will be measured by one masked glaucoma specialist who is unaware of the treatment assignments. After the IOP measurements, after a 5-minite rest, pulse rate and BP (systolic and diastolic) of radial artery were measured in the sitting position using a standard automated blood pressure cuff. During the period, all measuring instruments keep to be calibrated by the manufacturer's instruction.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
The identification of NTG was based on reproducible glaucomatous visual field defects, corresponding to typical ONH changes.
Unilateral or bilateral visual field loss (description as below) as determined by at least two consecutive automated static threshold perimetry tests.
One eye is randomly selected in the cases where both eyes are treated.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
dorzolamide/timolol fixed combination eyedrop, 2 times a day
Other names: Cosopt
compare with dorzolamide/timolol fixed combination eyedrop one time a day
Other names: Xalatan
Time frame: 4 weeks
IOP (mean IOP) after 4 weeks of treatment
Time frame: 12 weeks
IOP (mean IOP) after treaemt from week 8 to week 12
Time frame: 4 weeks
systolic and diastolic BP at 4 weeks after use of eyedrops
Time frame: 12 weeks
systolic and diastolic BP measured after treaemt from week 8 to week 12
Time frame: 4 weeks
OPP was calculated according to the following formula:
OPP=(1/3 systolic BP + 2/3 diastolic BP) x 2/3 -IOP, diastolic OPP (DOPP)=diastolic BP-IOP
Time frame: 12 weeks
OPP was calculated according to the following formula:
OPP=(1/3 systolic BP + 2/3 diastolic BP) x 2/3 -IOP, diastolic OPP (DOPP)=diastolic BP-IOP
OPP after treaemt from week 8 to week 12
The Catholic University of Korea
Other
To Prove the Non-inferiority of Cosopt Compared to Xalatan in the Aspects of Intraocular Pressure and Ocular Perfusion Pressure in Subjects With Normal Tension Glaucoma
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06449352
Eye Diseases, Glaucoma
Austin, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06266351
Eye Diseases, Glaucoma
Tucson, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01254149
Eye Diseases, Glaucoma
Omaha, Nebraska, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04014933
Eye Diseases, Glaucoma
Zurich, Canton of Zurich, Switzerland
View Trial Details