HealthPartners Neuroscience Center
Saint Paul, Minnesota, 55130, United States
NCT Number: NCT04251585
This project will investigate exploratory outcomes related to the effect of intranasal insulin on cognition, mood, apathy and motor performance of subjects with Parkinson's disease over a 3 week period.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me41 year–89 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Saint Paul, Minnesota, 55130, United States
Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disease after Alzheimer's dementia and was originally described as a motor disease. The diagnosis of PD is still based on the core motor features of bradykinesia, resting tremor, and rigidity, primarily as a result of degeneration of nigrostriatal dopaminergic neurons. In addition to the classic motor symptoms, however, PD is increasingly recognized as a multisystem disorder. A variety of non-motor symptoms, including cognitive deficits and dementia, are commonly observed in patients with PD.
In this study, we aim to investigate which intranasal insulin dose out of three doses and placebo, administered at three different doses or placebo over a 21-day period, is the optimum dosage based on safety and tolerability in Parkinson's disease. A similar design was used in a trial investigating intranasal oxytocin in frontotemporal dementia. Dosing for the first two groups of this study is based on previously conducted intranasal insulin studies in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI), using daily doses on 20 and 40 IU of intranasal insulin. Higher dose have been found to be safe in healthy adults. Prior studies performed have demonstrated favorable effects of this regimen in the MCI/AD population without peripheral hypoglycemia.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Intranasal insulin
Intranasal placebo (0.9% saline)
Time frame: 3 weeks
Composite safety event - this is a count of either a reduction of fasting glucose to <70 mg/dL or an unintended reduction of weight >5%. A larger composite event count indicates a less safe treatment.
Time frame: baseline and 3 weeks
Pre-post change in fasting glucose (mg/dL). A larger decrease in fasting glucose indicates a less safe treatment.
Time frame: baseline and 3 weeks
Pre-post change in body weight (lbs). An unintended decrease in body weight indicates a less safe treatment.
Time frame: 3 weeks
Total number of AEs/SAEs during the course of treatment. More AEs/SAEs indicates a less safe treatment.
Time frame: 5 weeks
Pre-post difference. Total sum of scores. Range: 0-30. Higher score indicates less memory loss
Time frame: 3 weeks
Pre-post difference. Scaled score. Range: 1-19. Forward and backward. Lower score indicates more impairment.
Time frame: baseline and 3 weeks
Pre-post difference. T-score. Mean: 50, Standard deviation: 10. A higher T-score indicates a better outcome/performance. Clinically, 1-1.5 standard deviations would be significant, 2 standard deviations would be considered abnormal/impaired.
Time frame: baseline and 3 weeks
Pre-post difference. T-score. Mean: 50, Standard deviation: 10. A higher T-score indicates a better outcome/performance. Clinically, 1-1.5 standard deviations would be significant, 2 standard deviations would be considered abnormal/impaired.
Time frame: 3 weeks
Pre-post difference. Total number of errors. No range. More errors indicate more impairment.
Time frame: baseline and 3 weeks
Judgement of Line Orientation is an assessment of visuospatial ability. A Z-score of 0 represents the population mean. Pre-post difference. A positive difference indicates an improvement.
Time frame: baseline and 3 weeks
Pre-post difference. Scaled score. Range: 1-19. Logical memory immediate and delayed. Lower score indicates more impairment.
Time frame: baseline and 3 weeks
Pre-post difference in median category from baseline to 3 weeks on the Logical memory, recognition subscale. Scoring of this and all outcomes were based on best practices conveyed by study neuropsychologist during study design, and scoring approaches were chosen completely a priori. The recognition outcome of the LM test is derived from a series of conversions, as follows. First, the raw "process" score is converted to cumulative percentage (0-100). Because the cumulative percentage distribution is known to be skewed, best practice is to report scores as the following ordinal categorizations of cumulative percentages: <1, 3-9, 10-16, 17-25, 26-50, 51-75, and >75. To analyze them using simple statistics, these ordinal categories are converted to integer values (1-7), and the change in median ordinal category is presented along with 95% confidence intervals, generated by the Wilcoxon signed rank test with continuity correction.
Time frame: baseline and 3 weeks
Pre-post difference. T-score. Mean: 50, Standard deviation: 10. A higher T-score indicates a better outcome/performance. Clinically, 1-1.5 standard deviations would be significant, 2 standard deviations would be considered abnormal/impaired.
Time frame: 3 weeks
Pre-post difference. T-score. Mean: 50, Standard deviation: 10. A higher T-score indicates a better outcome/performance. Clinically, 1-1.5 standard deviations would be significant, 2 standard deviations would be considered abnormal/impaired.
Time frame: baseline and 3 weeks
Pre-post difference. T-score. Mean: 50, Standard deviation: 10. A higher T-score indicates a better outcome/performance. Clinically, 1-1.5 standard deviations would be significant, 2 standard deviations would be considered abnormal/impaired.
Time frame: baseline and 3 weeks
Pre-post difference. T-score. Mean: 50, Standard deviation: 10. A higher T-score indicates a better outcome/performance. Clinically, 1-1.5 standard deviations would be significant, 2 standard deviations would be considered abnormal/impaired.
Time frame: baseline and 3 weeks
Pre-post difference. Raw score. Range: 0-63. Higher score indicates more symptomatic.
Time frame: baseline and 3 weeks
Pre-post difference. Raw score. Range: 0-42. Higher score indicates more symptomatic.
Time frame: baseline and 3 weeks
Pre-post difference. Raw score. Range:1 or 0. 1 score - more symptomatic, 0 score - no symptoms.
Time frame: baseline and 3 weeks
Pre-post difference. Raw score. Range: 0-72. Higher score indicates more symptomatic.
Time frame: baseline and 3 weeks
Pre-post difference in median category from baseline to 3 weeks on the Brief Visual Spatial Memory Test - Revised recognition. Scoring of this and all outcomes were based on best practices conveyed by study neuropsychologist during study design, and scoring approaches were chosen completely a priori. The recognition outcome of the BVMT test is derived from a series of conversions, as follows. First, the raw score is converted to cumulative percentage (0-100). Because the cumulative percentage distribution is known to be skewed, best practice is to report scores as the following ordinal categorizations of cumulative percentages: <2, 2-5, 6-10, 11-16, >16. To analyze them using simple statistics, these ordinal categories are converted to integer values (1-5), and the change in median ordinal category is presented along with 95% confidence intervals, generated by the Wilcoxon signed rank test with continuity correction.
HealthPartners Institute
Other
Single Center Safety and Tolerability Trial of Intranasal Insulin in Parkinson's Disease
Acronym: INI-PD
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04687878
Basal Ganglia Diseases, Brain Diseases
Tehran, Iran
View Trial DetailsNCT02953665
Basal Ganglia Diseases, Brain Diseases
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02064166
Autonomic Nervous System Diseases, Basal Ganglia Diseases
Worcester, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05266417
Basal Ganglia Diseases, Brain Diseases
Davie, Florida, United States
View Trial Details