Pamukkale University
Denizli, Pamukkale, 20070, Turkey (Türkiye)
NCT Number: NCT07415278
This prospective comparative study was conducted to evaluate the clinical efficacy, onset of action, and side-effect profiles of intranasal fluticasone propionate (FP) monotherapy and a fluticasone propionate-azelastine (MP-AzeFlu) combination in adult patients with moderate-to-severe allergic rhinitis. Patients with positive skin prick test results were randomly assigned to receive either FP monotherapy or MP-AzeFlu combination therapy. Symptom severity and quality of life were assessed at baseline, day 7, month 1, and month 2 using the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) and a visual analog scale (VAS). The primary objective was to compare changes in quality-of-life scores between treatment groups. Secondary outcomes included onset of symptom relief and treatment-related sensory side effects.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
Denizli, Pamukkale, 20070, Turkey (Türkiye)
Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a chronic inflammatory condition of the nasal mucosa that significantly affects patients' quality of life, sleep, and daily functioning. Intranasal corticosteroids are recommended as first-line therapy for moderate-to-severe AR; however, some patients experience delayed symptom relief or insufficient control. Combination therapy with an intranasal antihistamine and corticosteroid may provide faster and more effective symptom control, but comparative data on onset of action, quality-of-life outcomes, and side-effect profiles are limited.
This prospective, randomized, comparative clinical study was conducted at a tertiary care otorhinolaryngology clinic. Adult patients presenting with symptoms of allergic rhinitis and positive skin prick test results were screened. Patients with moderate-to-severe symptoms, defined by a Score for Allergic Rhinitis (SFAR) of 7 or higher, were included. Eligible participants were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups: intranasal fluticasone propionate (FP) monotherapy or a fixed-dose combination of fluticasone propionate and azelastine hydrochloride (MP-AzeFlu). Treatments were administered according to the recommended dosing schedules.
Patients were evaluated at baseline and at day 7, month 1, and month 2 after treatment initiation. Clinical efficacy and quality of life were assessed using the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) and a visual analog scale (VAS). The onset of action was defined as the first day on which patients reported noticeable symptom improvement. Adverse effects, particularly taste and smell disturbances, were also evaluated using VAS scores. The primary objective was to compare changes in quality-of-life scores between the two treatment groups, while secondary objectives included onset of symptom relief and the assessment of treatment-related side effects.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Antihistamines (within the last week) Nasal or oral decongestants (within the last week) Topical corticosteroids (within the last 2 weeks) Membrane stabilizers (within the last 2 weeks) Leukotriene antagonists (within the last 2 weeks) Systemic corticosteroids (past 4 weeks) Immunotherapy (within the past 5 years)
Intranasal fluticasone propionate is administered according to standard dosing recommendations for the treatment of moderate-to-severe allergic rhinitis.
Fixed-dose intranasal combination of fluticasone propionate and azelastine hydrochloride administered according to recommended dosing schedules.
Time frame: Baseline to Month 2
Change in the total score of the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) from baseline to 2 months after treatment initiation.
Pamukkale University
Other
INTRANASAL FLUTICASONE VERSUS FLUTICASONE-AZELASTINE COMBINATION AS FIRST-LINE THERAPY IN ALLERGIC RHINITIS: A PROSPECTIVE COMPARATIVE STUDY
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07060885
Allergic Rhinitis, Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
View Trial DetailsNCT07532837
Allergic Rhinitis, Hypersensitivity
Taichung, Taiwan
View Trial DetailsNCT07455968
Allergic Rhinitis, Hypersensitivity
Bangkok, Thailand
View Trial DetailsNCT06828484
Allergic Rhinitis, Hypersensitivity
Kingston, Ontario, Canada
View Trial Details