Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Active, Not Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07415278

INTRANASAL FLUTICASONE VERSUS FLUTICASONE-AZELASTINE COMBINATION

This prospective comparative study was conducted to evaluate the clinical efficacy, onset of action, and side-effect profiles of intranasal fluticasone propionate (FP) monotherapy and a fluticasone propionate-azelastine (MP-AzeFlu) combination in adult patients with moderate-to-severe allergic rhinitis. Patients with positive skin prick test results were randomly assigned to receive either FP monotherapy or MP-AzeFlu combination therapy. Symptom severity and quality of life were assessed at baseline, day 7, month 1, and month 2 using the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) and a visual analog scale (VAS). The primary objective was to compare changes in quality-of-life scores between treatment groups. Secondary outcomes included onset of symptom relief and treatment-related sensory side effects.

Active, Not Recruiting

This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

Pamukkale University

Denizli, Pamukkale, 20070, Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a chronic inflammatory condition of the nasal mucosa that significantly affects patients' quality of life, sleep, and daily functioning. Intranasal corticosteroids are recommended as first-line therapy for moderate-to-severe AR; however, some patients experience delayed symptom relief or insufficient control. Combination therapy with an intranasal antihistamine and corticosteroid may provide faster and more effective symptom control, but comparative data on onset of action, quality-of-life outcomes, and side-effect profiles are limited.

This prospective, randomized, comparative clinical study was conducted at a tertiary care otorhinolaryngology clinic. Adult patients presenting with symptoms of allergic rhinitis and positive skin prick test results were screened. Patients with moderate-to-severe symptoms, defined by a Score for Allergic Rhinitis (SFAR) of 7 or higher, were included. Eligible participants were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups: intranasal fluticasone propionate (FP) monotherapy or a fixed-dose combination of fluticasone propionate and azelastine hydrochloride (MP-AzeFlu). Treatments were administered according to the recommended dosing schedules.

Patients were evaluated at baseline and at day 7, month 1, and month 2 after treatment initiation. Clinical efficacy and quality of life were assessed using the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) and a visual analog scale (VAS). The onset of action was defined as the first day on which patients reported noticeable symptom improvement. Adverse effects, particularly taste and smell disturbances, were also evaluated using VAS scores. The primary objective was to compare changes in quality-of-life scores between the two treatment groups, while secondary objectives included onset of symptom relief and the assessment of treatment-related side effects.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 18 years and older
  • Clinical symptoms consistent with allergic rhinitis
  • Positive skin prick test results
  • Moderate-to-severe allergic rhinitis defined as a Score for Allergic Rhinitis (SFAR) of 7 or higher
  • Willingness to participate and provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients under 18 years of age
  • Patients with atopic diseases (e.g., atopic dermatitis) or asthma, other than allergic rhinitis
  • Those with a recent respiratory tract infection, nasal polyps, or septal deviation
  • Patients who had previously undergone sinonasal surgical treatment
  • Individuals who use tobacco, alcohol, or illicit drugs
  • Those who have used the following medications:

Antihistamines (within the last week) Nasal or oral decongestants (within the last week) Topical corticosteroids (within the last 2 weeks) Membrane stabilizers (within the last 2 weeks) Leukotriene antagonists (within the last 2 weeks) Systemic corticosteroids (past 4 weeks) Immunotherapy (within the past 5 years)

  • Patients with allergic rhinitis symptom score <7

Treatment and study plan

Fluticasone propionate nasal spray

Drug

Intranasal fluticasone propionate is administered according to standard dosing recommendations for the treatment of moderate-to-severe allergic rhinitis.

Fluticasone propionate-azelastine nasal spray

Drug

Fixed-dose intranasal combination of fluticasone propionate and azelastine hydrochloride administered according to recommended dosing schedules.

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) total score

    Time frame: Baseline to Month 2

    Change in the total score of the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) from baseline to 2 months after treatment initiation.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Pamukkale University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

INTRANASAL FLUTICASONE VERSUS FLUTICASONE-AZELASTINE COMBINATION AS FIRST-LINE THERAPY IN ALLERGIC RHINITIS: A PROSPECTIVE COMPARATIVE STUDY

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2026
First posted
Feb 17, 2026
Registry last updated
Feb 17, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.