University Clinical Hospital №2 (I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University))
Moscow, 119435, Russia
NCT Number: NCT05108714
The purpose of this study is to determine efficiency and safety of injecting a micro-amount of 2% lidocaine with the commercially available microneedle device MinronJet600 (NanoPass Technologies Ltd, Israel) (registration number RZN2017/5544 by Federal Service for Surveillance in Healthcare of Russian Federation) to achieve rapid local anesthesia for peripheral venous cannulation.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Moscow, 119435, Russia
The trial is prospective, randomised, open-label, placebo-controlled. The start date of patient enrolment was January 29 of 2019. Simple randomization was performed to allocate subjects into two groups using the Microsoft Excel random number generator. As a result of randomisation, subjects were allocated into two groups - Group1 and Group2.
In this study, each subject from Group1 received injection of local anaesthetic into the left arm and sterile saline as a placebo into the right arm, the injections were performed with MicronJet600 and followed by the intravenous cannulation; each subject from Group2 will receive injection of local anaesthetic into the left arm, which was performed with MicronJet600 and followed by the intravenous cannulation, with no pre-treatment prior to the intravenous cannulation in case of the right arm. Pain caused by the cannulations was rated by the subjects in accordance with 100-point visual analogue scale. Safety parameters was assessed throughout the study.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Intradermal administration of 100 µL of lidocaine (registrational number LS001516 by Federal Service for Surveillance in Healthcare of Russian Federation) via MicronJet600 microneedle device at the site of antecubital fossa of the left arm, followed by the insertion of 18G catheter in a cubital vein immediately after the lidocaine administration.
Intradermal administration of 100 µL saline (registration number РN002134/01 by Federal Service for Surveillance in Healthcare of Russian Federation) via MicronJet600 microneedle device at the site of antecubital fossa of the right arm, followed by the insertion of 18G catheter in a cubital vein immediately after the saline administration.
Intradermal administration of 100 µL of lidocaine (registrational number LS001516 by Federal Service for Surveillance in Healthcare of Russian Federation) via MicronJet600 microneedle device at the site of antecubital fossa of the left arm, followed by the insertion of 18G catheter in a cubital vein immediately after the lidocaine administration.
insertion of 18G catheter in a cubital vein without prior interventions.
Time frame: Immediately after intravenous catheterisation with 18G cannula.
Pain scores experienced by the subjects due to intravenous catheterisation with 18G cannula. were recorded by using a 100-point visual analogue scale.
Time frame: At 15 minutes after the intradermal lidocaine injection.
Pain scores experienced by the subjects due to a pin-prick with a 27G needle at 1, 2 and 3 centimetres from the site of intradermal lidocaine injection were recorded by using a 100-point visual analogue scale.
Time frame: At 30 minutes minutes after the intradermal lidocaine injection.
Pain scores experienced by the subjects due to a pin-prick with a 27G needle at 1, 2 and 3 centimetres from the site of intradermal lidocaine injection were recorded by using a 100-point visual analogue scale.
Time frame: At 45 minutes after the intradermal lidocaine injection.
Pain scores experienced by the subjects due to a pin-prick with a 27G needle at 1, 2 and 3 centimetres from the site of intradermal lidocaine injection were recorded by using a 100-point visual analogue scale.
Time frame: 24 hours after the lidocaine injection with MicronJet600.
Any kind of local and systemic adverse events were recorded after the lidocaine injection with MicronJet600 followed by the intravenous cannulation.
Time frame: Immediately after the intravenous catheterisation with 18G cannula.
Preference to receive injection of lidocaine with MicronJet600 before intravenous cannulation over the cannulation without any pre-treatment in subjects of Group2. The preference was recorded with the 5-point Likert scale.
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
Other
The Use of MicronJet600 Microneedle for Intradermal Lidocaine Injection to Ensure Local Anaesthesia During Insertion of Peripheral Venous Catheters
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05528497
Local Anaesthesia, Oocyte Retrieval
Rennes, Brittany Region, France
View Trial DetailsNCT06763510
Local Anaesthesia
Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT05083975
Local Anaesthesia
Cairo, Manial, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT03445182
Agnosia, Local Anaesthesia
Plovdiv, Bulgaria
View Trial Details