Paclitaxel Eluting Balloon + Scoring Balloon
DeviceScoring/cutting balloon lesion predilation; paclitaxel eluting balloon therapy
NCT Number: NCT01632371
The purpose of the study is to determine whether scoring balloon (SCB) plus paclitaxel-coated balloon (PCB) is superior to PCB alone for the treatment of restenosis within "limus"-eluting stents (LES)
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
1. Med. Klinik am Klinikum rechts der Isar der TU Muenchen, Munich, Bavaria, Germany
The optimal treatment of in-BMS-restenosis seems to be implantation of a DES which is supported by a large body of evidence. Nevertheless, several recent published studies have shown a substantial reduction in late lumen loss and angiographic restenosis using paclitaxel-coated balloons (PCB) for restenotic lesions. Given the increased world-wide use of DES and the use of DES in increasingly complex coronary disease patterns, the number of patients presenting with restenosis after DES implantation will further increase in the coming decade.
Data regarding the optimal treatment of in-DES-restenosis are very limited: Implanting a new DES for in-DES-restenosis has been reported to associate with repeat restenosis rates as high as 20%. In addition, an increased risk of stent thrombosis has been associated with complex stenting and with additional DES implantation. Thus, for lesions which develop restenosis after LES implantation, the optimal treatment strategy remains unknown.
Few results on small sample-size populations have been reported in patients treated with scoring or cutting balloon (SCB) technology for treatment of BMS restenosis as compared to plain balloon angioplasty. Moreover, the efficacy of SCB angioplasty in DES restenosis has not been adequately addressed. Furthermore, the potential additive benefit of SCB angioplasty in patients undergoing PCB therapy remains to be elucidated. The hypothesis behind this concept is that the application of SCB prior to deployment of PCB may increase the bioavailability of paclitaxel within the restenotic tissue, and therefore may increase the efficacy of PCB. There are numerous preclinical studies to support this hypothesis, which show that lesion preparation is an important pre-requisite for the effectiveness of PCB.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Scoring/cutting balloon lesion predilation; paclitaxel eluting balloon therapy
Standard balloon lesion predilation; paclitaxel-eluting balloon therapy
Time frame: 6-8 months
In-segment percent diameter stenosis (%DS) at 6-8 month follow-up angiography
Time frame: 6-8 months
The difference between minimal lumen diameter post-procedure and minimal lumen diameter at follow-up angiography
Time frame: 6-8 month
diameter stenosis ≥50% in the in-segment area (including the interventional area as well as 5 mm margins proximal and distal) at follow-up angiography
Time frame: 1 and 2 years
Combined incidence of death or myocardial infarction at one and two year
Time frame: 1 and 2 years
Need for target lesion revascularization (TLR), defined as any revascularization procedure involving the target lesion due to luminal re-narrowing in the presence of symptoms or objective signs of ischemia at one and two year follow-up
Time frame: 1 and 2 years
Incidence of target lesion thrombosis at one and two years
Time frame: 6-8 months
Tissue characterization following application of SCB and PCB using OCT at 6 -8 months follow up
Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen
Other
ISAR-DESIRE 4: Randomized Trial Of Scoring Balloon in Patients With Restenosis in "Limus"-Eluting Coronary Stents Undergoing Angioplasty With Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon
Acronym: ISAR-DESIRE 4
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03332264
Bites and Stings, Chemically-Induced Disorders
Graz, Austria
View Trial DetailsNCT02621489
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
Stockholm, Other, Sweden
View Trial DetailsNCT01065532
Restenosis
Leuven, Belgium
View Trial DetailsNCT01735825
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
Ostrava, Czechia
View Trial Details