Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01477814

Interventions to Improve Colon Cancer Screening in Poor Rural Iowa Counties

The goal of the study is to conduct a randomized clinical trial to test several office-based strategies for improving colon cancer screening among individuals who are regular patients at 16 family practice physician offices in the state of Iowa. These offices are members of the Iowa Research Network (IRENE), a rural practice-based research network. The interventions to be tested are increasing in intensity from the usual care provided in the office, to physician chart reminders, mailed educational materials to patients, a fecal immunochemical test with postage-paid return envelope, and a telephone call designed to determine attitudes and barriers to screening, and to motivate subjects to get screened. Our main research questions are: 1)do attitudes toward CRC screening change after providing educational materials about CRC screening? 2)do mailed educational materials and a FIT, with or without a telephone reminder, result in increased rates of CRC testing with the FIT?

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

52 year–79 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Iowa Research Network, University of Iowa

Iowa City, Iowa, 52242-1097, United States

About this study

Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in the U.S. yet approximately half of eligible adults are not up-to-date with colon cancer screening and the rates of screening are lower among those with lower incomes and who lack insurance. A physician's recommendation for screening has consistently been show to be one of the most powerful predictors of CRC screening. Relatively few studies of CRC screening have been conducted in primary care. Disparities in CRC screening rates are seen in low socioeconomic and rural individuals who often lack resources and access to screening. Most intervention studies have been conducted in managed care settings, community health centers, Veteran's Administration or academic practices. Few studies have looked at interventions in rural medical practices. This research will address screening issues for rural patients and those residing in communities designated as medically underserved. The interventions tested in the study will focus on two key areas: educating the patient about the importance of screening, and reminding the physician about the need to discuss screening during the patient's visit.

The original goal of the study was to enroll 1500 unscreened patients aged 52 to 79 years from 16 family physician practices located in poor, rural Iowa counties. This study will test a combination of patient and physician reminder strategies designed to ensure that the patient is educated about CRC screening and receives a recommendation for CRC screening from their physician. The main outcome is colorectal cancer screening by any of the accepted methods. Rates of screening will be compared across intervention groups. We will also determine how much the interventions cost per person screened.

Patients due for screening within each practice (based on their self-report) (never screened or not up to date with screening) will be randomized to one of four groups that will receive office reminder system strategies of increasing intensity: 1) Usual care, 2) Physician chart reminder alone, 3) Physician chart reminder plus multifaceted mailed patient education, including a postage paid fecal immunochemical test, a reminder magnet, and returnable CRC screening test preference sheet, or 4) Physician chart reminder + multifaceted mailed patient education/FIT/magnet/preference sheet + telephone reminder to encourage screening and address barriers.

Our central hypothesis is that providing offices with one or more CRC screening support systems based on the Chronic Care Model will significantly increase CRC screening rates in comparison with usual care, and that such interventions will be cost-effective and accepted in practice.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • patients not up-to-date with CRC screening guidelines based on their responses to baseline survey
  • patients with a positive personal history of CRC

Exclusion criteria

  • patients with personal history of CRC or inflammatory bowel disease
  • patients with a family history of hereditary conditions that put them at high risk for CRC (familial adenomatous polyposis or hereditary, nonpolyposis CRC)
  • inability to read and comprehend the Informed Consent or written survey
  • patients who are up-to-date with CRC screening guidelines based on their response to the baseline survey

Treatment and study plan

Physician chart reminder

Behavioral

Subjects randomized to this intervention will have paper or electronic chart reminders placed on their medical records alerting their physicians to the need for colorectal cancer screening

Other names: chart reminder

chart reminder, educational mat'ls, FIT

Behavioral

Subjects randomized to this group will have a physician chart reminder, mailed educational packet which includes the CDC Screen for Life materials, a FIT with return envelope, a magnet to remind the subject about CRC screening and a CRC screening preference sheet

Other names: chart reminder, mailed education, FIT

CR,ed mat'ls, FIT, phone call

Behavioral

Subjects randomized to this group will have a physician chart reminder, mailed educational packet which includes the CDC Screen for Life materials, a FIT with return envelope, a magnet to remind the subject about CRC screening and a CRC screening preference sheet. Subjects will also receive a telephone call from project staff to assess barriers to screening and to encourage CRC screening

Primary outcomes

  1. colorectal cancer screening

    Time frame: 15 months

    The main outcome measure is the percentage of subjects who complete colorectal cancer screening by any of the accepted methods

Secondary outcomes

  1. cost-effectiveness of various strategies for screening

    Time frame: 15 months

    cost-effectiveness of the various interventions for colorectal cancer screening

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Barcey T. Levy

Other

Collaborators

  • American Cancer Society, Inc.

Registry information

Official study title

Randomized Clinical Trial to Improve Colon Cancer Screening in Poor Rural Iowa Counties

Important dates

Study start
2008
Primary completion
2010
Study completion
2015
First posted
Nov 23, 2011
Registry last updated
Apr 24, 2017

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.