HFR Fribourg
Fribourg, 1700, Switzerland
NCT Number: NCT05207631
The drug treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is mainly based on inhaled therapy. This route of administration is limited by inhaler handling errors, insufficient inspiratory flow or inappropriate inhalers. According to the scientific literature, these limitations are extremely common in both outpatients and inpatients.
Our hypothesis is that the implementation of a standardised and systematic assessment of inhalers combined with a prescribing guide to help select a suitable inhaler will decrease the proportion of suboptimally used inhalers at discharge in patients hospitalised with a diagnosis of COPD.
To assess the effectiveness of our intervention, the investigators will compare the proportion of inhalers used suboptimally at hospital discharge between a control cohort before the implementation of our intervention and a cohort after the implementation of our intervention. Secondary outcomes include reasons for sub-optimal use of inhalers, i.e. inhaler handling errors, insufficient peak inspiratory flow or inappropriate inhaler. Secondary outcomes will also include length of hospital stay and 30-day readmission rate.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Fribourg, 1700, Switzerland
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Participants included in the intervention cohort receive a systematic and standardised assessment of their inhalers on admission to our department. The assessment is carried out by a physiotherapist and aims to assess inhalation technique, peak inspiratory flow and ability to use the inhaler after targeted teaching. Based on this information and a prescription guide provided, the patient's doctor can select the most appropriate inhaler.
Time frame: This outcome is assessed within 48 hours prior to hospital discharge
An inhaler used sub-optimally is defined as an inhaler used with at least one critical error and/or with insufficient inspiratory flow.
Time frame: This outcome is assessed within 48 hours prior to hospital discharge
In accordance with the literature, the investigators define critical error as an action or an inaction that in itself would have a detrimental impact of the delivery of the drug to the distal airways.
Time frame: This outcome is assessed within 48 hours prior to hospital discharge
The peak inspiratory flow values considered sub-optimal for inhaler use are defined in the literature and are specific to each inhaler type.
Time frame: This outcome is assessed within 48 hours prior to hospital discharge
If critical errors are identified in the handling of the inhaler, the physiotherapist provides targeted instruction to correct these errors. After each instruction, a new assessment of the inhaler technique is performed and the instruction is repeated if a critical error persists. If handling critical errors persist despite appropriate instruction, it's considered that the inhaler cannot be handled by the patient.
Time frame: This outcome is assessed within 48 hours prior to hospital discharge
An inhaler is considered unsuitable if the patient is unable to handle it properly after appropriate instruction and/or if the patient does not have sufficient inspiratory flow for optimal use of the inhaler.
Time frame: This outcome is assessed within 48 hours prior to hospital discharge
The proportion of inhalers used sub-optimally at hospital discharge is described by type of inhaler.
Time frame: This outcome is assessed within 48 hours prior to hospital discharge
A participant is considered to have suboptimal device use if making a critical error when using an inhaler or if their peak inspiratory flow rate is insufficient for optimal device use.
Time frame: This outcome is assessed up to three months
The length of stay in acute care on the internal medicine department will be documented.
Hôpital Fribourgeois
Other
Misused Inhaler and Insufficient Peak Inspiratory Flow in Hospitalized COPD Patients Before and After Implementation of a Systematic Assessment and a Prescription Guide - a Quasi Experimental Study - MIPIF
Acronym: MIPIF
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03927820
Asthma, Bronchial Diseases
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06614959
Bronchial Diseases, Bronchitis
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT04754490
COPD, Chronic Disease
Abercynon, Wales, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT06336252
Arthritis, Basal Ganglia Diseases
Copenhagen, Denmark
View Trial Details